_1. Sent by A.M. , thank you By Joseph Farah, Publisher, – monthly publication of worldnetdaily.com What you hold in your hands (or could hold - the April 2009 issue of Whistleblower, jsk) is the result of an astonishing undertaking. It is not only the most complete and thorough exposé of the eligibility questions surrounding Barack Obama's presidency. It is an indictment of the process that put him in the White House, January 20 of this year. Perhaps the most astonishing part of this story is that virtually no other media outlet is even prepared to examine these questions seriously.
To me, this is a historic issue of whistleblower magazine. I do not pretend to know where the information you are about to read will lead. But, I do know that it is explosive, profoundly important and represents much more than the future of the Barack Obama administration. No less than our Constitution — the foundation of our national liberties and the rule of law in America — is at stake.
The story is at once complicated and quite simple. It begins with something everyone can understand - a birth certificate. You have to produce one to get a driver's license. You need to produce one to enroll your children in school or sports programs. You need to produce one to get a passport. But, despite a clear constitutional requirement that presidents of the United States must be "natural born citizens," apparently you do — not need to produce one to assume that office.
That begs the question. How do we establish that a presidential candidate is actually a natural born citizen"? And, the sad answer that question is that we don't. We don't know whether Barack Obama is a "natural born citizen." And, we don't know because he has steadily refused to produce proof for the American people.
Even worse, in my opinion, is the fact no one in authority seemed or seems willing to demand it. For instance, I had assumed prior to 2008, that the Federal Elections Commission would have responsibility for ensuring that our constitution is observed in the conduct of our presidential elections. I was wrong.
I had assumed, prior to 2008, that the Electoral College was bound to ensure that our Constitution is observed in the conduct presidential elections. I was wrong.
1 had assumed, prior to 2008, that the Congress of the United States was bound to ensure that our Constitution is observed in the conduct of our presidential elections. I was wrong.
I had assumed, prior to 2008, that the Supreme Court was bound to ensure that our Constitution is observed in the conduct presidential elections. I was wrong
I had assumed, prior to 2008, that state attorneys general and secretaries of state were bound to ensure that our Constitution is observed in the conduct of our presidential elections. I was wrong again.
Amazingly, what we earned prior to Barack Obama's inauguration as president January 20, 2009, is that no controlling legal authority bothered to establish that he was constitutionally eligible as a "natural born citizen."
The first test would have been the inspection of his birth certificate. It may not have resolved all the questions regarding his foreign parentage and his foreign residency, but it would be a necessary starting point in establishing his eligibility.
Everybody dropped the ball. The system failed. And, the result of that breakdown is an unprecedented lack of confidence in our governing institutions.
Nevertheless, this is the controversy that must go unmentioned - according to the Big Media gatekeepers. There is a price for discussing it in anything more than hushed tones. You will be called a 'conspiracy theorist" or worse — a "birther."
I'll accept the title, if a "birther" is anyone who believes the Constitution really means what it plainly says about the president needing to be a 'natural born citizen."
The insults won't stop WND, Whistleblower, or me from covering this issue as we have throughout the campaign and since the election. It's not going away — not until we see the complete birth certificate instead of the certification of live birth, and get some answers to questions of obviously growing concern to millions of Americans.
I don't know what Barack Obama is hiding by not releasing his complete birth certificate. But, it should be obvious to one and all that he is hiding something. Why continue to respond to a battery of lawsuits with legal maneuvering - fighting them by claiming that bona fide U.S. citizens — who aren't afraid to show their birth certificates — don't have legal standing. Why not just release the documents we all need to show to get a driver's license, to travel abroad, to play Little League baseball or to enroll in public school?
Ask this question before a group of reporters in this country and you will be hissed, booed and ridiculed. We know, because we've been asking it for a long time — some say too long. Just wait until they see this issue of Whistleblower! .sent by WAKE UP AMERICANS. Thank you, DSPlease read the following and share with all you can gather the Issues provided hereStrange how our national media has not mentioned a thing about this in the last few weeks since this story hitWonder why Pray for justice to be done! Pray everyone, that the Lord opens the door to the deceit pressed upon us by our media and so many who voted for CHANGE! Pray for all the members of the Committee on Foreign Relations (The Iluminatii) and that the banks in their control are ruined and never to arise again. For the Lord as our Shield we can not fail. So ACT now send this everywhere in the World! Pray our Supreme Court will open up to hearing the facts and rule that Barack Hussien Obama is a treacherous infiltratorObama Faces More Questions on Citizenship
April 02, 2009AP- WASHINGTON D.C. - In a move certain to fuel the debate over Obama's
qualifications for the presidency, the group "Americans for Freedom of
Information" has released copies of President Obama's college transcripts
from Occidental College. Released today, the transcript indicates that
Obama, under the name Barry Soetoro received financial aid as a foreign
student from Indonesia as an undergraduate at the school. The transcript was
released by Occidental College in compliance with a court order in a suit
brought by the group in the Superior Court of California. The transcript
shows that Obama applied for financial aid and was awarded a
fellowship for foreign students from the Fulbright Foundation Scholarship
program. To qualify, for the scholarship, a student must claim foreign
citizenship. This document would seem to provide the smoking gun that many
of Obama's detractors have been seeking.
The news has created a firestorm at the White House as the release casts
increasing doubt about Obama's legitimacy and qualification to serve as
president. When reached for comment in London, where he has been in meetings
with British Prime Minister Gordon Brown, Obama smiled but refused comment
on the issue. Meanwhile, White House press secretary Robert Gibbs scoffed at
the report stating that this was obviously another attempt by a right-wing
conservative group to discredit the president and undermine the
administration's efforts to move the country in a new direction.
Britain's Daily Mail has also carried the story in a front-page article
titled, "Obama Eligibility Questioned", leading some to speculate that the
story may overshadow economic issues on Obama's first official visit to the
U.K.
In a related matter, under growing pressure from several groups, Justice
Antonin Scalia announced that the Supreme Court agreed on Tuesday to hear
arguments concerning Obama's legal eligibility to serve as President in a
case brought by Leo Donofrio of New Jersey. This lawsuit claims Obama's dual
citizenship disqualified him from serving as president. Donofrio's case is
just one of 18 suits brought by citizens demanding proof of Obama's
citizenship or qualification to serve as president.
Gary Kreep of the United States Justice Foundation has released the results
of their investigation of Obama's campaign spending. This study estimates
that Obama has spent upwards of $950,000 in campaign funds in the past year
with eleven law firms in 12 states for legal resources to block disclosure
of any of his personal records. Mr. Kreep indicated that the investigation
is still ongoing but that the final report will be provided to the U.S.
attorney general, Eric Holder. Mr. Holder has refused to comment on the
matter.
2 comments:
Re: The alleged AP article that Occidental Collge released Obama's transcript
This was an April Fool's story. The Associated Press (a member of the mainstream media) did not publish such a story, and Occidental did not release the transcript. Moreover, the lawsuit in which the Occidental records were demanded has now been thrown out as moot, and even more suprisingly, in that case (Keyes v Bowen), the plaintiffs attempted to subpoena Obama's academic and housing records--but not records of scholarships.
In short, all of this was made up.
Not only is Strauss full of crap, but before we are done it will be proven that BHO is a Moslem and a foreign born citizen. He is a usurper, a charlaton, and the reason he bowed to the Saudi King is the man helped put him in the Whitehouse.
Post a Comment