The Secret Machinations of the Vatican and its Allies in Israel, and our Survival, 2006
By Daisy J. Stern, MD
August 2006
First of all, a few words regarding the historical context of this essay:
As mentioned in a scholarly article by the Jerusalem-based Catholic Franciscan writer, Sabrino de Sandoli, dated 1990, the Franciscans, "Custodians of the Holy Land" for the Pope since the year 1217 C.E., have acquired many pieces of real estate for the Catholic Church in Eretz Yisrael. Their description of this as "the PEACEFUL liberation of the Holy Places" is an insult to Jewish memory.
In fact, their approach doesn't really differ much from the Muslims' "Dar-El- Charb" and "Dar-EI-Salaam": once a property was ever in Catholic hands, they consider it forever theirs, no matter the fact that G-D HIMSELF DEEDED IT to the Jewish People. Accordingly, they will use any means at their disposal, including murder and massacres, in order to reclaim it.
As an example, in the year 1429, (exactly 500 years before the Hebron massacre!), de Sandoli describes a situation in which "through the intrigues of certain rabbis, the authorities of Jerusalem took from the Franciscans the ground floor containing the "FALSE TOMB OF DAVID" ( i.e. Har Zion). AS A RESULT, there were REPRISALS AGAINST THE JEWS OF EUROPE .... In 1430 it was returned .... "
As you can see, to this day -1990 -, the Catholic Church considers reprisals against Jews worldwide a perfectly legitimate reaction to the failure by Jews in Eretz Yisrael to hand over territory they have decided belongs to them.
In that particular incident, the Pope forbade anyone to transport Jews to the Holy Land, in the midst of heavy persecution of Jews in Europe. Don't forget, the Inquisition was raging all over Europe in those days!
So let's see what Shimon Peres and Yossi Beilin concocted in 1993, the year of the Oslo Accords, with the help of the Meshumad (apostate) Israeli, Franciscan "Father" David Yaeger, representative of the Vatican and specialist of Canon Law (apparently, the process started in 1992, pretty much at the time of Rabin and Peres's election, and PRECEDED the OSLO agreement).
In what is described as a much more important accord than the Oslo Accords themselves, called the FUNDAMENTAL AGREEMENT of 1993, these negotiators, who were not even empowered by the Israeli Government under Rabin to do so - the Knesset never ratified the agreement -, signed a document, which was also signed by the Vatican representatives. This document contained three major points:
I. Normalization of relations between the Vatican and Israel- i.e., full diplomatic relations -
2. To be seen in the WIDER CONTEXT OF IMPROVED CATHOLIC -JEWISH RELATIONS (i.e. pogroms, Inquisition, Holocaust, etc. relinquished, replaced instead by a newly found "friendship" worldwide), and
2. Relationship between the Vatican and Israel as regards legal status of Church properties, taxation, return of properties the Church considers HERS.
We see from the outset that there is a direct link between "PEACE" between Catholics and Jews, and "LAND" return to the Church.
THIS, TO MY OPINION, IS THE AUTHENTIC LAND FOR PEACE AGREEMENT THAT WAS SIGNED BY THE CHURCH AND THE MENUVALIM TRAITORS: WE, AM YISRAEL, GIVE YOU THE LAND, YOU THE CHURCH, LEAVE US IN PEACE.
The "other", Oslo Peace agreement, was only a smokescreen for this, much more FUNDAMENTAL AGREEMENT - hence the name.
WHAT YOU WOULD CALL CODED LANGUAGE ..
The only problem is, nobody besides the signatories had agreed to this deal!
The Church, however, took this agreement very seriously. In fact, it expected full implementation within two years.
It was signed December 30th, 1003. By the end of 1995, besides the assassination of Yitshak Rabin a month earlier, nothing had happened (any link there?).
In 1997, the agreement was further refined. Still, no movement, Israel doesn't budge, is not handing over the "CHURCH PROPERTIES" - and believe me, the list is a few pages long!
What the Church really wanted is this:
1. NO TAXATION OF THE PROPERTIES: after all, if you are the "MASTER", how can you be expected to pay taxes to a "VASSAL", right??
2. THE RETURN OF THE MANY PROPERTIES, actually Jewish land and Jewish memorabilia, taken over by Israel since 1948. The Church claims that the 1948 UN decision contained such a clause. It could be, but so what??
3. LEGAL REPRESENTATION IN ISRAELI COURTS REGARDING SUCH DISPUTES. The Israeli Government, correctly so, always refused to give lower courts jurisdiction to decide whether to allocate that land to the Church or to other owners. It itself reserves that right. So in fact, the Church can't even argue its case in court!
Not only that, but, as mentioned earlier, the Israeli Government itself NEVER RECOGNIZED THIS AGREEMENT!
So what happened?
Bibi got elected, was in no hurry to hand over Eretz Yisrael to the Church.
Barak, "intifada ", no movement.
Sharon.
The Church is getting impatient.
Gets the U.S. involved: in fact, this topic is the ONLY ONE GEORGE W.BUSH, in his first term, actually got involved with in pressuring the Israeli Government: RETURN CHURCH PROPERTIES!
August 2003 marked the low point, with total breakdown in negotiations.
August 28, 2003, under heavy pressure by the Church and the US Government, Jewish and Israeli negotiators reluctantly return to the table.
So now, pay attention to the developments:
IN SEPTEMBER OF 2003, YESHIVA UNIVERSITY GETS A NEW PRESIDENT, RICHARD JOEL, CFR STOOGE.
IN JANUARY 2004, THE LARGEST EVER MEETING OF CARDINALS OUTSIDE OF ROME TAKES PLACE AT YESHIVA UNIVERSITY. The organizers of the meetings are another Meshumad, Cardinal Lustiger, and Israel Singer of the World Jewish Congress. What happens there? Ten Cardinals; a lot of Rabbis, Orthodox, Conservative, Reform, attend: 16 Orthodox rabbis, of which current and former chief rabbis from six different countries; among them former Chief Rabbi of Israel Israel Meir Lau. There, besides "learning Torah", a highly dubious activity in this setting, "ANTISEMITISM AROUND THE WORLD IS BEING DISCUSSED."
I would say, read: heavy pressure is put on the rabbis:" Pressure Israel, give us back our properties, or else we cannot vouch for your safety."
You will see the proof a year later.
Negotiations, negotiations - according to David Rosen, one of the chief negotiators, because of "much nagging by Diaspora Jewish leaders and egged on by their Catholic counterparts."
Are you beginning to see a pattern, or am I the only one?
Still, very little progress in negotiations,
JUNE 2004, the Church sends out a communique that diplomatic relations resumed,"just after the tenth anniversary of the signing of the agreement". The Church is counting years, see?
Who are the negotiators?
On the Catholic side:
PIETRO SAMBI, Archbishop, APOSTOLIC NUNCIO TO ISRAEL AND PALESTINE, who has been stationed here since June 1998 - important detail, - and who else?
FRANCISCAN FATHER DAVID YAEGER.
Also, in case of need, GIOVANNI LAJOLO, Vatican Secretary for Relations with States, who, incidentally, brings this issue to the attention of the UN. - another important detail, related to the soon to be "Congress of Rabbis and Imams" organized by the UN in JANUARY 2005, to soften the attitude of masses of rabbis towards "PEACE", i.e. towards territorial compromise by Israel.
On the Israeli side:
Representatives of the Ministry of Finance, Foreign Affairs, and representatives of Ariel Sharon.
Still, no progress.
IN JANUARY OF 2005, THE PRESIDENT OF THE U.S. CONFERENCE OF CATHOLIC BISHOPS, WILLIAM SKYLSTAD OF SPOKANE, WASHINGTON, WRITES A SHARPLY WORDED LETTER TO THE AMBASSADOR OF ISRAEL, DANIEL AYALON, AS WELL AS A CORRESPONDING LETTER TO CONDOLEEZZA RICE, in which he says, among other things:
" ... a just resolution IS CRITICAL TO INTERRELIGIOUS RELATIONS IN THE WIDER REGION AND IN THE W ORLD".
I don't know about you, but to me, it sounds very much like a veiled threat of violence against Jews WORLDWIDE. We all know what bad inter-religious relations between Catholics and Jews mean: pogroms, inquisition, etc, etc; you elaborate. And after all, the same thing happened in 1429, with full Church justification for it in 1990, remember?
Parallel to the STICK, the CARROT is being applied, in the form of , - HOW SWEET AND LOVING - , "Rabbis and Imams for PEACE", a conference taking place January 3 to 6, 2005 in Brussels, Catholic capital of Europe, under the patronage of the King of Belgium. On the surface the alleged brainchild of Swiss "peace lover" Alain Michel, founder of the NGO" Hommes de Parole", it is in reality a FRONT for the UN, the EU, the Vatican, our dear, loving European friends, and the Ford Foundation. I will elaborate on this concoction further in this article. Let it be summarized for the time being with the statement that the whole idea is to bring rabbis, particularly Israeli chief rabbis, but also many others, to the table, in order to brainwash them into buying the whole peace charade, so they can influence their governments ( into ceding Church properties, i.e. territory, for peace).
Let it be clear, in addition, that the Catholic Church is a strong supporter of the Oslo Peace Agreement, which, as noted earlier, goes hand in hand with the Fundamental Agreement, and is a code for the same goal, namely, return of "Church properties" to the Church, under the guise of fairness to the Arabs.
In February and March of 2005, secret negotiations take place over Church properties. NO progress. But promises of more meetings.
APRIL 24, 2005, A NEW GERMAN POPE, BENEDIKT XVI, IS INAUGURATED. HIS ORIGINAL NAME WAS CARDINAL JOSEPH RATZINGER.
***
Who is Joseph Ratzinger, besides being a German?
1. THE GRAND INQUISITOR OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH!
EVEN THOUGH THE NAME OF THE INQUISITION HAS BEEN CHANGED IN 1908 TO THE "HOLY OFFICE" AND IN 1965 TO "THE SACRED CONGREGATION FOR THE DOCTRINE OF THE FAITH", THE OFFICE REMAINS ESSENTIALLY THE SAME AS IT HAS BEEN FOR SEVEN HUNDRED YEARS.
CARDINAL RATZINGER WAS THE "PREFECT OF THE CONGREGATION", THAT IS, THE CHIEF INQUISITOR.
And he still supports this office: in January 2006, the Undersecretary of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith at the Vatican, Rev. Joseph di Noia, made a televised appearance on UK TV, supported by his superiors, in defense of the torture and the burnings perpetrated by the Inquisition! Isn't this a major cause of concern? Especially considering that the previous pope APOLOGIZED for the Inquisition??
2. HE IS ALSO THE SAME CARDINAL WHO CAME IN APRIL 1992 TO MEET TEDDY KOLLEK IN JERUSALEM, BEFORE THE START OF THE "OSLO PEACE AGREEMENT", IN ORDER TO DISCUSS THE STATUS OF JERUSALEM, AND TO GET THE BALL ROLLING TO RETAKE THE "CHURCH PROPERTIES" THROUGH THE FUNDAMENTAL AGREEMENT.
In addition, it is important to note that the FRANCISCANS, to which Fr. David Yaeger belongs, were one of the two monastic orders in charge of ENFORCING THE INQUISITION!
SO WE SEE THAT NEITHER THE POPE NOR FRANCISCAN FATHER DAVID YAEGER ARE STRANGERS TO THE METHODS OF THE INQUISITION, I.E. THE ASSUMED PREROGATIVE TO KILL, BURN AND TORTURE IN THE NAME OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH.
***
The Church is getting VERY IMPATIENT.
JUNE 6, 2005: ADIN STEINSALTZ IS ELECTED PRESIDENT OF THE SANHEDRIN IN JERUSALEM.
A little background on that is necessary.
Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz has been involved in interfaith events for quite a few years, and has strong ties to the Vatican. He was present at Yeshiva University also, in January 2004. He kibitzes (jokes) with the Vatican people, is chum chum (friendly, familiar) with them.
At that same meeting, it is decided to REBUILD THE BETH HAMIKDASH (THE HOLY TEMPLE OF SOLOMON).
Now, for your information, Napoleon, in his time, had also decided to create a Sanhedrin for the French Jews. His condition? That they GIVE UP ALL THEIR RIGHTS TO ERETZ ISRAEL, at the same time becoming full-fledged, equal, French citizens (could this be the secret motivation of the French to this day?)
The big question is, how come, all of a sudden, the Sanhedrin, which came into being October 13, 2004, only nine months earlier, decided, in one breath, to elect a "Court Jew" as its president, while at the same time deciding to start rebuilding the Temple? Could there be a Napoleon behind this whole scheme? And who would be that Napoleon? And what would be the price demanded of the Jews in order to guarantee their safety and equality?
(I have to stress that the following line of reasoning is speculative; still, these questions need a clear answer, as there seems to be widespread and recurring doubt as regards the integrity of the Sanhedrin's leadership). So here is my argument:
Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz has close financial and other ties to the powers that be:
James Wolfensohn's wife sits on the board of Steinsaltz's Aleph Society
So does Daniel Adler of the Israel Policy Forum, a major NWO think tank
Wolfensohn himself just recently chaired a $200,000 dinner for the Aleph Society
Steinsaltz is a recurring, familiar, and appreciated guest of the Vatican.
Assuming that Steinsaltz is incorruptible and does everything for the benefit of Am Yisrael, IF THERE WAS A NAPOLEON BEHIND THE SANHEDRIN REVIVAL, what would Steinsaltz, as President of the Sanhedrin, be willing to give away in exchange for safety and security for Jews worldwide, and protection from the Vatican's fury?
EXACTLY THE SAME THING AS HIS FRENCH PREDECESSORS DID! After all, he has demonstrated that he is willing to give up Eretz Yisrael , by associating closely with Wolfensohn and company, by not opposing the Gush Katif surrender in any way, shape or form, and by promoting Jewish life in the Galut as no better than Jewish life in Israel.
I PERSONALLY BELIEVE THAT THE NAPOLEON IN QUESTION, IF THERE IS ONE, CAN ONLY BE THE VATICAN. Why?
Because of the association with the initiative to rebuild the Temple. This is a very important tenet for the Catholic Church: in order for j ... s to return, and for the pope to sit as the undisputed spiritual and temporal ruler of the whole world, it is very important for the Catholic Church that the Temple be rebuilt.
***
Notice the PARALLEL - or should we say, MODUS OPERANDI?-
In August of 2003, breakdown of talks:
pressure by the US (by Bush himself) to finalize the agreement with the Church.
Shortly thereafter, the Jewish Orthodox religious institution Yeshiva University "infiltrated" by a Jewish CFR figure.
Jewish sovereignty at Yeshiva University is history.
Heavy Vatican pressure, using respected rabbis, to make it look as though the initiative to pressure the Israeli Government comes from respected leaders of the Jewish people (typical CFR-Jesuit- Vatican tactic of operating through a FRONT), and not from the Vatican.
In January of 2005, no progress in talks:
-heavy pressure by the Church on the US, urging Condoleezza Rice to get involved in forcing Israel to finalize the agreement with the Church.
- (This time, direct threats to Israel as well).
-Shortly thereafter, the Jewish Orthodox religious institution Sanhedrin "infiltrated "by a Jewish Vatican interfaith figure.
- Jewish sovereignty at the Sanhedrin: history or not? Only time will tell.
- Heavy CFR-EU-UN-Vatican pressure, using respected rabbis (Rabbis and Imams for Peace)) to make it look as though the initiative to pressure the Israeli Government comes from respected leaders of the Jewish people (typical CFR-Jesuit Vatican tactic of operating through a FRONT) and not from the Vatican.
***
Continuation of the Saga:
JUNE-JULY 2005: Sharon promises to take talks seriously. TALKS SUPPOSED TO TAKE PLACE IN JULY. However, again a snafu, this time in the form of a BREAKDOWN IN TALKS WITH THE VATICAN, FOLLOWING FAILURE BY THE VATICAN TO CONDEMN TERROR IN ISRAEL EXCLUSIVELY, AS OPPOSED TO OTHER COUNTRIES, and resulting Israeli criticism.
Catholic sources claim this is only a pretext for Sharon to stall once more.
By the way, quite likely, Sharon stands firm when it comes to Jerusalem. This is NOT to the liking of the Church, i.e. the new Pope, at all! They expect a written apology by Sharon. Sharon dutifully complies in August 2005, apologizes in writing to the pope ... AND EVACUATES GAZA ON TISHA BE' AV, COMPLIMENTS OF WOLFENSOHN, ADIN STEINSALTZ'S BUDDY.
"PIETRO SAMBI (with other words, THE GRAND INQUISITOR POPE) IS SATISFIED".
WE ARE FRIENDS AGAIN, THAT WONDERFUL, DEEP CATHOLIC-JEWISH FRIENDSHIP.
SEPTEMBER 15, 2005: BOTH CHIEF RABBIS, Amar and Metzger, visit the Vatican. Topic: Church properties. No progress.
NOVEMBER 9-11: ADIN STEINSALTZ, GUEST LECTURER AT THE VATICAN, AS PART OF AN EVENT SPONSORED BY THE TEMPLAR SIR JOHN TEMPLETON, a very nice man, but a Templar nevertheless and a big believer in interfaith meetings.
Highly unlikely that high ranking Vatican officials didn't use the opportunity to discuss many topics with Adin Steinsaltz , such as "How is the Sanhedrin coming along?", and" What about OUR properties? Can you PLEASE intervene? YOU BETTER DO SOMETHING, OR ELSE ".
NOVEMBER 17, 2005: Israeli President MOSHE KATSAV at the Vatican, being hosted by the Pope. Topic: Church Properties. Moshe Katsav promises to accelerate negotiations, but the Catholic press reports "They are still firm in their positions". Interestingly, the same article also mentions that "One senior Jewish leader, long involved in Catholic/Jewish Dialogue ... had recently pressed the Israeli Foreign Ministry to take the negotiations seriously, even resorting to cursing in Yiddish to stress the importance of the issue. The Jewish leader said that it is "absurd" that the broader Catholic/Jewish relationship should be "complicated" by such "relatively minor diplomatic differences" (such as RETAINING ERETZ ISRAEL AND JERUSALEM FOR THE Jewish People! By the way, does this fearful statement by a Diaspora Jew ring a bell of deja-vu???)
THE CHURCH IS GETTING EXTREMELY IMPATIENT, BY THEIR OWN ACCOUNT.
NOVEMBER 24, 2005, ONLY A WEEK LATER: CATHARTIC MEETING IN ISRAEL: ALL OF A SUDDEN THE CATHOLIC PRESS REPORTS PROGRESS. What happened to cause such a change of attitude??
Very simple: only three days earlier, November 21, 2005, Sharon officially declared his formation of the new KADIMA PARTY, the OSLO AGREEMENT PARTY, which Shimon Peres joined a few days later, November 28, 2005.
It means that OLMERT, as Finance Minister, is now directly involved.
Who exactly participated in that meeting? Fr. DAVID YEAGER was one of the chief negotiators on the Catholic side. Who else? Was PIETRO SAMBI present?
WAS SHIMON PERES, AS ONE OF THE SIGNATORIES OF THE ORIGINAL AGREEMENT, AND AS FUTURE SENIOR MEMBER OF THE KADIMA PARTY, INVOLVED?
WAS SHARON APPRISED OF ALL THE DETAILS OF THE MEETING? We know that Sharon himself, although willing to relinquish more settlements, ALWAYS STUBBORNLY REFUSED TO RELINQUISH JERUSALEM. Yet AsiaNews, mouthpiece of the Vatican, reports: "the Delegations ... have brought about progress ... in negotiating the comprehensive agreement… . " How could the Catholic delegation be so satisfied if Sharon still refused to relinquish Jerusalem, unless Sharon did NOT participate, and was LEFT OUT OF THE DEAL BY BOTH PARTIES???
It is important to find out EXACTLY what happened at that meeting, who was there on both sides of the negotiations, what was said on both sides, and what was decided, in order to understand what transpired three weeks later, and why.
DECEMBER 17, 2005: ANNOUNCEMENT BY THE VATICAN THAT THE POPE HAS JUST DECIDED TO REPLACE PIETRO SAMBI WITH ANOTHER, NEW NUNCIO - AFTER EIGHT AND A HALF YEARS IN JERUSALEM!
PIETRO SAMBI IS BEING TRANSFERRED TO WASHINGTON, DC., USA (Leaves Jerusalem for good late January, will arrive in the US February 24, 2006)
MISSION ACCOMPLISHED, OR REPLACEMENT WITH A TOUGHER NUNCIO?
IS HE BEING TRANSFERRED BECAUSE HIS PRESENCE HERE IS GETTING SUSPICIOUS, OR BECAUSE HE IS TOO SOFT ON JEWS? PIETRO SAMBI IS DESCRIBED AS A NICE MAN (I met him, I liked him!), HE GETS ALONG WITH EVERYBODY, HE GETS HIGH GRADES FROM RABBI LAU. HE IS NOT A FRANCISCAN, NOT AN INQUISITOR. COULD HE POSSIBLY BE AN OBSTACLE TO THE PLANS OF THE POPE? OR IS HE AN ACCOMPLICE? HIS ACTIONS IN ISRAEL SHOW A MIXED RECORD.
WHY IS HE BEING TRANSFERRED TO WASHINGTON? WHAT KIND OF NEFARIOUS PLANS WILL HE ENGINEER WITH SKYLSTAD? WE KNOW THAT THE CHURCH ALWAYS PUTS PRESSURE ON ISRAEL VIA THE US GOVERNMENT. WHAT IS THE CHURCH PLANNING IN THE US TO FORCE ISRAEL TO COMPLY WITH ITS DEMANDS?
IS THERE A LINK WITH THE LATEST LEBANON WAR?
THE VERY NEXT DAY AFTER THE ANNOUNCEMENT OF SAMBI'S TRANSFER, DECEMBER 18, 2005, ACCORDING TO BARRY CHAMISH (what are your sources, Barry?), SHARON HAS TEA WITH SHIMON PERES, COLLAPSES HALF AN HOUR LATER WITH A "STROKE".
COINCIDENCE, G-D'S WILL, OR FOUL PLAY?
***
The "Cup of Borgia" is a tried and true method used by Jesuits over and over again to get rid of important personages, among them Popes, whom they felt interfered with their aims. It was a tasteless poison that was administered, usually surreptitiously, by a person familiar with the victim.
***
JANUARY 2006, SHARON AS GOOD AS DEAD, BUT NOT QUITE YET, THANKS TO THE "TREATMENT" OF HADASSAH HOSPITAL, DEAR FRIENDS OF EHUD OLMERT ("WE OWE HIM").
(THE ACTUAL DEATH PROCESS IS BEING INTRODUCED GRADUALLY; ACT II TAKES PLACE AT THE BEGINNING OF THE CURRENT LEBANON WAR. WHEN IS ACT III PLANNED FOR: FOR WHEN THE CRUSADERS COME MARCHING VICTORIOUSLY INTO JERUSALEM, AS A FITTING FINALE FOR THE EXPECTED VATICAN VICTORY OVER THE LION OF JERUSALEM?)
MARCH 28, 2006: STOLEN ELECTIONS, WITH SHARON "TEMPORARILY INCAPACITATED", ACCORDING TO YOSSI BEILIN'S PAL MANNY MAZUZ. OLMERT WINS THE ELECTION. SHIMON PERES IS NUMBER TWO ON THE LIST.
APRIL 6, 2006: ONE WEEK AFTER THE ELECTION"VICTORY", PERES RUNS ... TO THE KOTEL? NO, SORRY, TO THE POPE, TO PAY HIS RESPECTS, AND TO BRING BY PERSONAL COURIER A LETTER FROM EHUD OLMERT -AFTER ALL, WHOM ELSE CAN YOU TRUST WITH SUCH A SECRET AND IMPORTANT MESSAGE??? - AND WHAT ELSE - TO PROMISE THAT THE CHURCH PROPERTY MATTERS WILL FINALLY BE TAKEN CARE OF PROPERLY.
WHAT IS WRITTEN IN THAT LETTER? DID OLMERT ACTUALLY RECOGNIZE THE FUNDAMENTAL AGREEMENT? WHY WERE THE CONTENTS OF THAT LETTER NEVER PUBLICIZED? DO WE NOT HAVE THE ABSOLUTE RIGHT TO KNOW ITS CONTENTS? IS OLMERT PLAYING WITH OUR LIVES AND OUR LAND IN SECRET?
DURATION OF THE MEETING: 40 MINUTES, AN EXCEPTIONALLY LONG MEETING BY "POPE-EY" STANDARDS.
BY THE WAY, THE DATE SHIMON PERES VISITS THE INQUISITOR POPE COINCIDES WITH AN IMPORTANT JESUIT JUBILEE BEING CELEBRATED IN ROME, WHICH STARTS APRIL 7 (500 TH ANNIVERSARY; HOW INTERESTING! DIDN'T THE HEBRON MASSACRE OF 1929, ALLOWED BY THE BRITISH-ANGLICANS-SEMICATHOLICS, OCCUR 500 YEARS AFTER THE HUTZPAH OF THESE JEWS TO TRY TO KEEP DAVID'S TOMB IN 1429? COULD THERE BE A NOT SO SUBTLE HINT THERE? RETRIBUTION TO THE JEWS 500 YEARS AFTER THEIR "CRIME"; SUBMISSION OF THE JEWS 500 YEARS AFTER JESUIT SUCCESSES?)
Now I am asking you: do you believe this all to be one big coincidence? The Church had nothing to do with it? Or alternatively, only G-d pulled the strings, and the Church had no part in these machinations? The nice, peaceful Catholic Church we are all so familiar with?
As an epilogue, I would like to share with you some more information on the way these sinister actors work behind the scene.
The 'Second Congress of Rabbis and Imams" took place March 24, 2006, in Seville, Spain. The date itself is highly suspicious, falling right before the Israeli elections. But what is even more sinister is the way the whole thing was engineered behind the scene by forces that had nothing to do with what was presented to the public.
The alleged organizer of the affair is a certain Alain Michel, as mentioned earlier. Supposedly the founder of" Hommes de Parole", a Swiss, neutral NGO; what was not mentioned, however, is that this same Alain Michel has been the CEO, for 15 years, of a FRENCH U.N. - UNESCO NGO called EquiLibre, which in the past had supported the P .A. and had delivered truckloads of supplies to them.
Furthermore, what was NOT mentioned, is that the "partners" - read, financial sponsors of this event - included the U.N. , UNESCO, the EU, the Ford Foundation, Spain, and a few Jewish and Arab donors.
Why these conferences? The organizers candidly acknowledge" Because the religious ministers ... enjoy true power. .. they can influence governments ... urging them in making decisions."
Decisions that the UN, the EU, the Vatican, the Ford Foundation will approve of, of course: such as electing Olmert and Peres; and returning Church properties.
So how do they operate? They brainwash these naive rabbis (and imams) into believing that they are advancing the cause of peace by "teaching them to read the "Holy Books" (read the Torah, the Koran), in ways that fits the EU Global Village philosophy; basically teaching Apikorsut to these rabbis in the name of peace.
Most suspicious, however, was the presence of 80 so-called "specialists and Christian personalities". What is a specialist? How about:" a Vatican "specialist" in Muslim Affairs?" Or a "coordinator of inter-religious affairs of Catholic Universities ", or a "coordinator of Three faiths Forum" ... You get the picture.
Who participated? Well, besides Kofi Annan, various Ford Foundation representatives, "specialists" in inter-religious relations, etc. Chief Rabbi Metzger, various other chief rabbis, including rabbis of various Israeli cities, MANY RABBIS FROM ROME (are you surprised? , the famous Sufi Sheikh of Nazereth who loves us so much he just cursed us recently, Sheikh Manasra ; Michael Melchior; Menachem Froman, the list goes on and on.
Why did it take place in Seville, under the patronage of King Juan Carlos and the King of Morocco?
Well, for one thing, King Juan Carlos is the representative of the Vatican on the political scene.
Furthermore, I believe there was another, more cynical motive: Seville is in Andalusia, the Spanish province home to one of the most flourishing Jewish communities of Spain for centuries, until the Catholic Inquisition burned, killed, robbed, converted and/or kicked out every Jew present on Spanish soil; a stark reminder of what the Catholic Church is capable of, if Jews (and Israel) don't do as the Church wishes.
Also, it is not far from Toledo, home of the beautiful, moving "Church of Santa Maria La Blanca", actually a synagogue converted by our dear Catholic friends of old into a Church. This is the building that the Church is offering to TRADE FOR THE TOMB OF KING DAVID, ON HAR ZION, IN JERUSALEM!
By taking all these rabbis there, the Vatican-UN-EU-CFR accomplished a multiple whammy:
1. They frightened the rabbis to death
2. They taught them to speak UN-VATICAN Lingo, or else
3. They got immediate emissaries to the Israeli voters, grossly attempting to interfere with Israeli (and P.A.) elections.
4. The emissaries, once more, acted as FRONTS for the EU, UN, Vatican, CFR.
5. They made the rabbis desire the beautiful synagogue.
6. They managed to get an instant, home-grown mouthpiece for their nefarious schemes.
***
As an example, just now, the site "Hommes de Parole" carries the following declaration in the names of Rabbis and Imams of 40 countries regarding the current war raging in Lebanon:
" ... We call upon all the leaders of all the parties concerned in this conflict TO STOP THE VIOLENCE IMMEDIATELY ; TO IMPLEMENT A DURABLE CEASEFIRE, IF NECESSARY GUARANTEED BY INTERNATIONAL FORCES ... "
Now do you see the Machiavellian scheme perpetrated upon these naive rabbis who participated, for instance the Chief Rabbi of Israel, Yonah Metzger? By claiming to speak in the name of rabbis who participated in both congresses, they are actually putting words in their mouths they would probably never dream to say. The rabbis are claiming support for international forces at the Israel-Lebanese border, the GOAL OF THE NWO!!
Would Rabbi Metzger say such a thing?
DID Rabbi Shear Yashuv Cohen, or Oded Wiener, or David Rosen, actually say such a thing? After all, they are part of the "Permanent Committee of the Congress of Rabbis and Imams", and as such, probably made this declaration.
If they said it, it is an absolute outrage that has to be exposed. They are priming the IDF for failure!
If, on the other hand, the UN exploited their naivete, that too, has to be exposed!
***
In Israel, the evil ones got their first wish: a few days after the first "Congress", the Israeli public elected Ehud -CFR Olmert and Shimon-Vatican Peres.
Now they are scheming for their next wish: Jerusalem, and all of Israel.
Barry Chamish is convinced this current war is connected to the whole scheme. It looks more and more like he could be right:
The fact that David Rosen, one of the major negotiators of the Fundamental Agreement, and a strong supporter of the Vatican's demands regarding Church Properties, is on the Committee, clearly points to the Vatican as the instigator of these "Congresses of Rabbis and Imams".
In addition, this demand by him for international forces at Israel's borders also implicates the Vatican. Not by accident did France and Italy, Catholic countries, volunteer troops for this task. The Pope wants "his" troops here!
***
Of the VATlCAN, the CFR, the EU, the UN, I say: YEMACH SHEMAM VEZICHRAM. May their memory be obliterated forever and ever.
To Olmert and Peres, I say: You will get your own in due time, do not have any doubt about it.
To the Rabbis I say: wake up! See what these Reshaim are doing to you, playing with your minds! See through their schemes! Don't be either cowards or fools. Do what Hashem wants, not what the Reshaim want, and we will succeed, B"H!!! Otherwise, YOUR names will be remembered for posterity, forever and ever, as collaborators to this horrible crime being perpetrated, once again, upon Eretz Yisrael and the Jewish People.
Daisy J. Stem, MD, NY, USA
Thanks to Barry Chamish, Joel Bainerman, Elisheva Barre, Elisheva Rubin, Bill, for their input.
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment