Ministers: Soldiers Won't Testify at Flotilla Panel
Sivan 26, 5770, 08 June 10 10:12
(Israelnationalnews.com)
Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu, along with government ministers and the IDF Chief of Staff, will all testify at a panel that will investigate the events in the IDF raid on the Gaza flotilla last week. The decision was made at a meeting of the inner cabinet Tuesday discussing the investigative panel. The group decided that IDF troops would not be asked to testify.
Comment:
I bet you they are afraid to look the soldiers in the eyes, after having knowingly and in cold blood sent them to be butchered and possibly even kidnapped by the flotilla terrorists.
See here:
http://israeltruthtimes.blogspot.com/2010/06/imperative-one-more-reason-barak-has-to.html
Why ask the chief actors and victims of the saga to be witnesses? It is just too damning.
See here:
http://israeltruthtimes.blogspot.com/2010/06/imperative-one-more-reason-barak-has-to.html
Why ask the chief actors and victims of the saga to be witnesses? It is just too damning.
It reminds me of other kangoroo courts, where the truth is manipulated, suppressed, covered-up, and falsified.
PROOFS OF BARAK'S INVOLVEMENT IN THE DISASTER:
(Israelnationalnews.com) Army Radio revealed on Wednesday that Israel's Defense Ministry prevented the participation of IDF representatives in discussions held in preparation for last week's commando raid on a Gaza-bound flotilla ship.
HE PLANNED THE MURDERS/KIDNAPPING OF ISRAELI SOLDIERS - WHICH THANK G-D FAILED TO MATERIALIZE - ALL BY HIMSELF, and/or WITH HIS CLOSE BUDDIES. WHO WERE THEY? DON'T WE HAVE THE RIGHT TO KNOW? WHO EXACTLY DID THE PLANNING FOR THIS DISASTROUS AND TRAITOROUS OPERATION?? WHO EXACTLY WAS PRIVY?
To understand the whole story, go back to the articles about the flotilla and Ehud Barak on this blog. - labels" flotilla", "Gaza", "Ehud Barak ", "Vatican schemes and lies" - , in case you didn't read them yet.
Following article sent by Barry:
By Ira Glunts
Is it possible that Rahm Emanuel will lead a team of high octane Democratic party pro-Israel political operatives to run the campaign for the former Prime Minister and current Defense Minister Ehud Barak in the next Israeli election? This scenario may not be as far-fetched as many may assume.
Consider that Bill Clinton, after many acrimonious encounters with the intransigent then Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu sent his own crack political operatives to assist Netanyahu’s opponent in 1999. Strategist James Carville, pollster Stanley Greenberg and TV advertising man Robert Shrum helped run Ehud Barak’s campaign for Prime Minister. Clinton thought Barak would be able to deliver a peace settlement with the Palestinians. Barak became the Israeli head of state, although he did nothing to promote peace in the region. However, Barak did provide a more congenial ally for the American president. It has been reported that he charmed Clinton who found it difficult to even refuse the Israeli’s most eccentric whim. Other than Barak’s stellar personality, the pro-Israel lobby may have been a contributing factor to Clinton’s unusual solicitousness.
President Barack Obama has a marked penchant for following the failed initiatives of previous American presidents, including appointing former Clinton officials to high profile positions. Think of the military build-up in Afghanistan and the bank bailouts. As for returning officials, you can start with Robert Rubin, Hillary Clinton, Dennis Ross and, of course, Rahm Emanuel.
When Ehud Barak, in a recent major speech to a large audience in Herzylia, Israel said that Israel must make peace with the Palestinians or it will become an apartheid state, the international media and many who are critical of the occupation praised his comments and lauded Barak as a peacemaker. Barak is not a force for peace and Israel has already imposed apartheid in the West Bank. Still, Barak is a smart, ambitious politician, who knows how to play music which will enchant a foreign audience and his song in Herzylia was apparently a hit. He also wants to be Prime Minister again.
The remarks made by Ehud Barak were surely not intended for domestic consumption since the very utterance of the term “apartheid” in relationship to Israeli policy automatically elicits charges of anti-Semitism among Israelis. But as former Prime Minister Ehud Olmert demonstrated, among the international community, warnings about apartheid can burnish the image of even a failed Prime Minister who has been forced out of office amid a serious corruption scandal.
President Obama may want to consider reprising Bill Clinton’s Israeli election gambit since Netanyahu humiliated him by ignoring his call for a settlement freeze and then forcing the novice head of state to declare that he and not Netanyahu was at fault for the failure to restart the Middle East peace process.
Barak is more of a team player than Netanyahu, and appeals to many Americans and Israelis who see Netanyahu’s belligerence as an embarrassment. And also, by the time the next Israeli election comes around, Obama may want to rid himself of Emanuel, his chief-of-staff, who has already offended many progressive Democrats by design, as well as others by the force of his personality. I am sure that Emanuel, who volunteered in the Israeli army during the first Iraq war and whose father is Israeli, would jump at the chance to contribute something worthwhile to Obama, to his second homeland and to the “peace process.”
If Barak was elected Prime Minister and the peace process was restarted, President Obama could get the credit for the resumption of the talks. However, any negotiations that Barak would lead would be characterized by unfair demands that would attempt to severely limit Palestinian sovereignty. They would be doomed to end in failure as were those at Camp David.
No matter. Restarting the talks will make Obama look like a savvy and successful diplomat. The fact that they will not lead anywhere also insures that Obama will not have to confront his pro-Israel supporters in the U.S. Obama could look like a peacemaker while preserving the status quo. Isn’t that what the current U.S. administration is all about, good appearance and no action?
The whole thing is a dirty business that is probably very well suited to an operator of Emanuel’s experience, temperament and background.
COMMENTS:Don't you think it is IMPORTANT to stop Ehud Barak NOW? Do we want this monster for another few years - see article below- ???? Will you do your part to expose him for his role in the flotilla disaster, and get him ousted from the government of Israel once and for all?
- Isn't the fact that the IDF knew ahead of time about what was greeting the soldiers, yet sent the boys unarmed, and didn't give them permission to use live fire until some of them were almost dead, sufficient proof?
- What about Eli Yishai , who also testified that Israel knew ahead of time?
- What about the fact that IHH is an intelligence agency - ( ISI) affiliate, via Pakistani chief of intelligence, what about the cooperation of all the intelligence agencies?
- What about Brennan and the CIA's involvement? The fact that Obama and the White House also participated, even though they firmly deny it, of course? See Obama's connection to Barak below.
- What about the date ( the 18th anniversary of Sultan Yakub almost to the day, Sivan 20 ? ( 'soft' proof)
- what about Livni coming out and asking for a vote of no-confidence in the gov right after the event?( soft proof)
- What about Labor asking to have the coalition widened to include Kadima right after that?( soft proof)
- Ehud Barak Kept IDF Out of Flotilla Raid Planning
Sivan 27, 5770, 09 June 10 10:47
HE PLANNED THE MURDERS/KIDNAPPING OF ISRAELI SOLDIERS - WHICH THANK G-D FAILED TO MATERIALIZE - ALL BY HIMSELF, and/or WITH HIS CLOSE BUDDIES. WHO WERE THEY? DON'T WE HAVE THE RIGHT TO KNOW? WHO EXACTLY DID THE PLANNING FOR THIS DISASTROUS AND TRAITOROUS OPERATION?? WHO EXACTLY WAS PRIVY?
To understand the whole story, go back to the articles about the flotilla and Ehud Barak on this blog. - labels" flotilla", "Gaza", "Ehud Barak ", "Vatican schemes and lies" - , in case you didn't read them yet.
This is a chance to break the hold of Ehud Barak and the enemies of the people in Israel: LET THE SOLDIERS TESTIFY! LET THEM TELL THE STORY! LET THEM REVEAL HOW THEY WERE SET-UP, ABANDONED BY THE HIGHEST COMMAND! LET THEM EXPOSE THE FILTH!!
SHAME ON YOU, BIBI! SHAME ON ALL OF YOU, WHO KNEW THE INSIDE STORY, YET SENT THE BOYS TO BE SACRIFICED TO A BLOOD-THIRSTY ENEMY! YOU SENT THE BOYS TO THE WOLVES TO BE DEVOURED!
AND HE, THE CRIMINAL BARAK, WANTS TO BE OUR PRIME MINISTER AGAIN? Heaven spare us!
Following article sent by Barry:
By Ira Glunts
Is it possible that Rahm Emanuel will lead a team of high octane Democratic party pro-Israel political operatives to run the campaign for the former Prime Minister and current Defense Minister Ehud Barak in the next Israeli election? This scenario may not be as far-fetched as many may assume.
Consider that Bill Clinton, after many acrimonious encounters with the intransigent then Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu sent his own crack political operatives to assist Netanyahu’s opponent in 1999. Strategist James Carville, pollster Stanley Greenberg and TV advertising man Robert Shrum helped run Ehud Barak’s campaign for Prime Minister. Clinton thought Barak would be able to deliver a peace settlement with the Palestinians. Barak became the Israeli head of state, although he did nothing to promote peace in the region. However, Barak did provide a more congenial ally for the American president. It has been reported that he charmed Clinton who found it difficult to even refuse the Israeli’s most eccentric whim. Other than Barak’s stellar personality, the pro-Israel lobby may have been a contributing factor to Clinton’s unusual solicitousness.
President Barack Obama has a marked penchant for following the failed initiatives of previous American presidents, including appointing former Clinton officials to high profile positions. Think of the military build-up in Afghanistan and the bank bailouts. As for returning officials, you can start with Robert Rubin, Hillary Clinton, Dennis Ross and, of course, Rahm Emanuel.
When Ehud Barak, in a recent major speech to a large audience in Herzylia, Israel said that Israel must make peace with the Palestinians or it will become an apartheid state, the international media and many who are critical of the occupation praised his comments and lauded Barak as a peacemaker. Barak is not a force for peace and Israel has already imposed apartheid in the West Bank. Still, Barak is a smart, ambitious politician, who knows how to play music which will enchant a foreign audience and his song in Herzylia was apparently a hit. He also wants to be Prime Minister again.
The remarks made by Ehud Barak were surely not intended for domestic consumption since the very utterance of the term “apartheid” in relationship to Israeli policy automatically elicits charges of anti-Semitism among Israelis. But as former Prime Minister Ehud Olmert demonstrated, among the international community, warnings about apartheid can burnish the image of even a failed Prime Minister who has been forced out of office amid a serious corruption scandal.
President Obama may want to consider reprising Bill Clinton’s Israeli election gambit since Netanyahu humiliated him by ignoring his call for a settlement freeze and then forcing the novice head of state to declare that he and not Netanyahu was at fault for the failure to restart the Middle East peace process.
Barak is more of a team player than Netanyahu, and appeals to many Americans and Israelis who see Netanyahu’s belligerence as an embarrassment. And also, by the time the next Israeli election comes around, Obama may want to rid himself of Emanuel, his chief-of-staff, who has already offended many progressive Democrats by design, as well as others by the force of his personality. I am sure that Emanuel, who volunteered in the Israeli army during the first Iraq war and whose father is Israeli, would jump at the chance to contribute something worthwhile to Obama, to his second homeland and to the “peace process.”
If Barak was elected Prime Minister and the peace process was restarted, President Obama could get the credit for the resumption of the talks. However, any negotiations that Barak would lead would be characterized by unfair demands that would attempt to severely limit Palestinian sovereignty. They would be doomed to end in failure as were those at Camp David.
No matter. Restarting the talks will make Obama look like a savvy and successful diplomat. The fact that they will not lead anywhere also insures that Obama will not have to confront his pro-Israel supporters in the U.S. Obama could look like a peacemaker while preserving the status quo. Isn’t that what the current U.S. administration is all about, good appearance and no action?
The whole thing is a dirty business that is probably very well suited to an operator of Emanuel’s experience, temperament and background.
SHmuel says:
The people must submit a rigid demand to Netanyahu to make sure that unthreatened soldiers, shielded from the poisonous son of a b... Barak, are allowed to give their report.
The people must also demand to know w/o "secretive" hideaways all the facts.
The pestilent disgrace barak that far too many times has sent or abandoned to their harm and even death many of our children must be unmasked once and for all.
He must go down and in time to confront a Judge elected by the people.
We must also demand to see sons, daughters, cousins, nephews, uncles and other family of that garbage passing as leadership in the front lines while war is being waged and mentioned as also hurt in action.
None of those family members show up for actual defense work.
- EVEN MORE EVIDENCE OF ISRAEL'S TOP BRASS DUPLICITY! Thanks to this botched operation, HAMAS WILL BE STRENGHTENED AGAINST ISRAEL! With UN cooperation of course. AND WHO IS RESPONSIBLE? BARAK.
http://www.jpost.com/Israel/Article.aspx?id=177929
See also:
http://israeltruthtimes.blogspot.com/2010/06/probe-into-israeli-flotilla-operation.html
POOR EXCUSE! Sounds logical, doesn't it? But the r...
Posts
1 comment:
Joel writes:
If Israelis en masse demand that the commandos testify, who will the commission choose. The way they work would be to pick a career officer, who will give a version of events that favors the desired findings of the investigation, which has already been determined. The officer will testify favorably and paid off with the promise of rapid advancement. Military men chosen by the commission could not be trusted unless it was comprised of the actual raiding party. Fat chance that will ever happen!
Post a Comment