A blog dedicated to investigating events as they occur in Judea and Samaria, in Israel and in the world, and as they relate to global powers and/or to the Israeli government, public figures, etc. It is dedicated to uncovering the truth behind the headlines; and in so doing, it strives to do its part in saving Judea and Samaria, and by extension, Israel and the Jewish People, from utter destruction at the hands of its many external and internal enemies.

Tuesday, January 5, 2010



Tuesday, January 5, 2010

To all,

It has been a while since I wrote a detailed paper about the H1N1 vaccine. I was still under the shock of the extremely hostile reaction I had gotten all over Israel because of my open letter to Professor Engelhard. The general content of the popular response was: you are a liar, you are crazy, what makes you say such things, why are you trying to hurt the Israeli population, .... and anyway, you are not even a real doctor, etc. etc...

Meanwhile, a few honest and serious doctors and medical people, who took what I had written seriously, asked me some very good questions: what do you think of the NEW vaccines that Israel imported recently, that are being offered to the public?  Can you please answer Professor Engelhard? Etc.

The truth is, I haven't even read Professor Engelhard's public response to my letter! I just know it was quite disparaging; I hope the day will come when I will read everything he said. Meanwhile, let this article be the first step in the right direction, in addressing ALL the issues one by one.

I have to warn you, this article is long and detailed. I did that on purpose, as the letter I wrote to Professor Engelhard was short and succinct, and that was held against me. So here I am explaining very clearly how I came to the conclusion I came to. If you find it too difficult or too long for you, go straight to" III. CONCLUSION ", which is towards the end of the article.

First of all, a piece of news I read today, which prompted me even more to write this paper:

Litzman Receives Swine Flu Vaccination

Tevet 18, 5770, 04 January 10 02:30
"( Deputy Health Minister Yaakov Litzman (United Torah Judaism) was vaccinated on Monday against the swine flu at Jerusalem's Health Bureau. Litzman was inoculated with a new version of the vaccination that does not contain an adjuvant.
The new version of the vaccine, which was originally intended for pregnant women and children but is now being offered to the general population, is said to be safer than the original which many were hesitant to receive due to health concerns."

And here is another piece of information that caught my eye:

Statistics of H1N1 vaccinations in Israel, as of 12/29/09, Haaretz article:
To sum it up: Israel ordered 7 million vaccines, and so far 225.364 people were vaccinated. Less than 1/3 of the health workers agreed to take the adjuvanted vaccine.
That comes out to roughly 3.22% of the population, more or less. PRETTY GOOD, I'd say. In comparison, France has administered 5 million doses out of a population of 65 million, which comes out to 7.69%. a lot of it Pandemrix. Which means that ISRAELIS ARE 2.4 TIMES SMARTER THAN THE FRENCH! That is very good, and encouraging. It also means that despite all the disparaging comments and attempts to deligitimize my letter, PEOPLE LISTENED  and I am glad.
Why should I be glad? Did I do something terrible to the Jewish People? Did I harm the population? I don't think so, on the contrary. 96.78% of the population did NOT get injected with squalene, and that is a big plus, as you will find out as you keep on reading.

So now let's address the issue of the NEWLY ARRIVED VACCINES, PANENZA and HUMENZA, which I was told are the vaccines that are being offered to the whole population of Israel, including pregnant women and children.

What do I think of them? Should you, or should you not take them?

If you want to understand WHY I say what I say, you should read the entire article. If on the other hand you are lazy, or it is just too hard for you, go straight to the CONCLUSION, which, of course, is towards the END of the article, -scroll down, CONCLUSION is paragraph  III - and you will see what I think of these Sanofi-Pasteur vaccines, without having to go through all the trouble.


About Panenza and Humenza

Sanofi Pasteur's influenza A (H1N1) 2009 monovalent inactivated influenza virus vaccines, Panenza and Humenza, are manufactured at Sanofi Pasteur's facility in Val de Reuil, France, using the same process as Sanofi Pasteur's seasonal trivalent influenza virus vaccine licensed in Europe.

Panenza is a non-adjuvanted vaccine formulated to contain 15 mcg hemagglutinin (HA) of influenza A/California/07/2009 (H1N1) v–like virus.

Humenza vaccine is formulated to contain 3.8 mcg hemagglutinin (HA) of influenza A/California/07/2009 (H1N1) v–like virus and includes AF03-adjuvant, Sanofi Pasteur's proprietary adjuvant, aimed at stimulating the immune system to increase its response.

Panenza and Humenza vaccines are not intended to be distributed in the U.S. where Sanofi Pasteur produces another A(H1N1) pandemic vaccine licensed by the F.D.A.


2. From the WHO:

[about the author, who works for the WHO as well as in industry]

Pre-clinical studies: Increases inflammation, reversible , increased WBC's; higher incidence of injection site reactions, no difference in systemic reactions ( 513 subjects)

The most advanced o/w emulsion
• Emulsions of oil-in-water.

– AS03 (GSK)
• squalene 10.68 mg, DL--tocopherol 11.86 mg, polysorbate 80 4.85 mg (1)

– MF59 (Novartis)
• squalene 9.75 mg, polysorbate 80 1.175 mg, sorbitan trioleate 1.175mg (2)

– AF03 (Sanofi Pasteur)
• Squalene-containing emulsion (2.5% emulsion)

– Other companies also developing squalene based


– Each emulsion is different therefore safety and
efficacy to be viewed separately ! 

3. My calculations:

How much squalene is there in each dose of Humenza?

  • A little bit more than GSK's Pandemrix, which caused a lot of morbidity - see below, December 23, 2009 report;
  • and about 1 mg more than Focetria.
AF03: 2.5% squalene containing emulsion ( NO polysorbate)/ each dose is 0.5 cc, of which 2.5% is squalene = 0.5 cc x 2.5%=0.0125 cc squalene. Specific gravity of squalene is 0.858. x 0.0125 cc=0.010725g=10.725 mg/dose, or about the same amount of squalene as AS03 of GSK ( Pandemrix)

(Is my calculation correct?It should at least be very close, for the following reason:
Unfortunately, 1ml does not equal 1cc! There is a very small difference, when you go to 5 decimal places; but don't hold it against me, please).

 4. HUMENZA  HAS NOT BEEN APPROVED ANYWHERE as of mid-December 2009. If the Israel Ministry of Health is giving it anyway, it is making its own decision and taking a chance, for better or for worse.

CBN Report

International Progress in Vaccine Development
and Distribution pdf
Kunal J. Rambhia and Jennifer Nuzzo, December 17, 2009

Countries of


Countries of approval
(date approved,
if available)


Sanofi Pasteur/

Europe: The U.S. and the EU followed, approving vaccines in mid- to late September and beginning vaccination programs in early to mid-October. In Europe, the European Medicines Agency (EMEA) is responsible for reviewing data for approval of drugs and vaccines in the EU. However, member countries have also independently approved and purchased vaccines that are not currently approved by the EMEA. To date, vaccination progress in Europe is mixed. While Sweden and Norway have vaccinated 33% and 25% of their populations, respectively, Poland has yet to start. Many other countries have not completed vaccination of priority groups, and some mass vaccination efforts are just beginning.26


Sanofi is awaiting European Union regulatory approval for two versions of its H1N1 flu vaccine, expecting clearance for the Panenza vaccine in the next couple weeks and for the Humenza adjuvanted, or booster-type, vaccine by mid-December.


As you can see , Humenza is another ADJUVANTED vaccine, which hasn't even been approved yet anywhere. Is it better than Pandemrix? Is it better than Focetria? I don't see why it would be. First of all, look at #2 above: the preclinical studies show even MORE localized side-effects for AF03 than for the others, although the truth is that at that time, none of them had barely been tested ( paper not dated, but for sure 2008 or later). After all, SQUALENE IS ONE OF THE MAIN OFFENDING AGENTS IN THESE VACCINES, AND HUMENZA CONTAINS EVEN MORE SQUALENE THAN PANDEMRIX. If you can read French, read the report at the end of this article: it is very informative. In it you will see how many serious reactions, even deaths, occurred because of Pandemrix. Why would ANYBODY take this formulation, please tell me?
As a reminder, please read what Dr. Blaylock, a very knowledgeable neurosurgeon whom I have quoted several times, has to say about SQUALENE:

Despite these two deadly events, WHO maintains an agreement with Baxter Pharmaceuticals to produce the world's pandemic vaccine. Novartis, the second contender, also has an agreement with WHO for a pandemic vaccine. Novartis appears to have won the contract, since their vaccine is near completion. What is terrifying is that these pandemic vaccines contain ingredients, called immune adjuvants that a number of studies have shown cause devastating autoimmune disorders, including rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis and lupus.

Animal studies using this adjuvant have found them to be deadly. A study using 14 guinea pigs found that when they were injected with the special adjuvant, only one animal survived. A repeat of the study found the same deadly outcome.

So, what is this deadly ingredient? It is called squalene, a type of oil. The Chiron company, maker of the deadly anthrax vaccine, makes an adjuvant called MF-59 which contains two main ingredients of concern—squalene and gp120. A number of studies have shown that squalene can trigger all of the above-mentioned autoimmune diseases when injected.

The MF-59 adjuvant has been used in several vaccines. These vaccines, including tetanus and diphtheria, are the same vaccines frequently associated with adverse reactions.

I reviewed a number of studies on this adjuvant and found something quite interesting. Several studies done on human test subjects found MF-59 to be a very safe immune adjuvant. But when I checked to see who did these studies, I found—to no surprise—that they were done by the Novartis Pharmaceutical Company and Chiron Pharmaceutical Company, which have merged. They were all published in "prestigious" medical journals. Also, to no surprise, a great number of studies done by independent laboratories and research institutions all found a strong link between MF-59 and autoimmune diseases.

Squalene in vaccines has been strongly linked to the Gulf War Syndrome. On August 1991, Anthony Principi, Secretary of Veterans Affairs admitted that soldiers vaccinated with the anthrax vaccine from 1990 to 1991 had an increased risk of 200 percent in developing the deadly disease amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), also called Lou Gehrig's disease. The soldiers also suffered from a number of debilitating and life-shortening diseases, such as polyarteritis nodosa, multiple sclerosis (MS), lupus, transverse myelitis (a neurological disorder caused by inflammation of the spinal cord), endocarditis (inflammation of the heart's inner lining), optic neuritis with blindness and glomerulonephritis (a type of kidney disease).

Because squalene, the main ingredient in MF-59, can induce hyperimmune responses and induce autoimmunity, a real danger exists for prolonged activation of the brain's immune cells, the microglia. This type of prolonged activation has been strongly associated with such diseases as multiple sclerosis, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, ALS and possibly vaccine-related encephalitis. It has been shown that activation of the systemic immune system, as occurs with vaccination, rapidly activates the brain's microglia at the same time, and this brain inflammation can persist for long periods.

So, how would the gp120 get into the brain? Studies of other immune adjuvants using careful tracer techniques have shown that they routinely enter the brain following vaccination. What most people do not know, even the doctors who recommend the vaccines, is that most such studies by pharmaceutical companies observe the patients for only one to two weeks following vaccination—these types of reactions may take months or even years to manifest.


A.Vaccine. 2001 Mar 21;19(17-19):2673-80. 
The adjuvanted influenza vaccines with novel adjuvants: experience with the MF59-adjuvanted vaccine.
Podda A.
Clinical Research and Medical Affairs, Chiron Vaccines, Chiron SpA, Via Florentina 1, 53100, Siena, Italy.
Elderly people and subjects with underlying chronic diseases are at increased risk for influenza and related complications. Conventional influenza vaccines provide only limited protection in the elderly population. In order to enhance the immune response to influenza vaccines, several adjuvants have been evaluated. Among these, an oil in water adjuvant emulsion containing squalene, MF59, has been combined with subunit influenza antigens and tested in clinical trials in comparison with non-adjuvanted conventional vaccines. Data from a clinical database of over 10000 elderly subjects immunised with this adjuvanted vaccine (Fluad, Chiron Vaccines, Siena, Italy) demonstrate that, although common postimmunisation reactions are more frequent in recipients of the adjuvanted vaccine, this vaccine is well tolerated, also after re-immunisation in subsequent influenza seasons. Immunogenicity analyses demonstrate a consistently higher immune response with statistically significant increases of postimmunisation geometric mean titres, and of seroconversion and seroprotection rates compared to non-adjuvanted subunit and split influenza vaccines, particularly for the A/H3N2 and the B strains. The higher immunogenicity profile of the MF59-adjuvanted vaccine is maintained also after subsequent immunisations. An even higher adjuvant effect was shown in subjects with low pre-immunisation titre and in those affected by chronic underlying diseases. In conclusion, the addition of MF59 to subunit influenza vaccines enhances significantly the immune response in elderly subjects without causing clinically important changes in the safety profile of the influenza vaccine.

B. Expert  review of vaccines; article written by Sanofi- Pasteur researchers:

C. And here are a couple of articles that remind us of the GHOSTWRITING that goes on in supposedly objective peer-reviewed medical journals: one is FROM ISRAEL! Make sure to read them, specially the last one, "GHOST WRITING CALLED RIFE.....", in order to understand the issues involved.

a. On transparency, responsibility, and accountability
M. Paul

Infectious Diseases Unit, Rabin Medical Centre, Beilinson Hospital, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
Randomized controlled trials assessing new antimicrobials are frequently designed, performed and analysed by the industry. The authorship
of these trials is not always transparent, even though authors are expected to be the guarantors of the data presented. Guest
authors may not be able to assume full responsibility for all trial data, and ghost authors are frequently no longer available when the
need to re-analyse trial results or complement published data arises. Academic and clinical contributions during the planning and design
stages of a trial are important. We welcome transparent and appropriate authorship of industry-initiated randomized controlled trials
with both positive and negative results.
Keywords: Authorship, randomized controlled trials, sponsorship

 Ghostwriting Is Called Rife in Medical Journals


1.First, there is the issue of the pandemic itself. PANENZA IS A MONOVALENT vaccine, which means that it is only effective against H1N1, not H5N1; and what about mutations? Papers show that these vaccines are ineffective on mutated virus.

So you have to consider where the actual H1N1 'pandemic' stands. And according to everything I am reading, it is abating right now. Although Israel mentions deaths from H1N1 almost daily, most of those patients have serious underlying disease. If you take a terminal lung cancer patient, for instance, and expose him or her to influenza, of course that immunosuppressed person will not be able to fight the infection and will most likely die, probably of a secondary infection such as pneumococcal pneumonia, not even of the H1N1 virus itself. But that patient will still be listed as having succumbed to H1N1. So these statistics are VERY misleading. And this is being done all over, mind you.

So the question is: is it really necessary at this stage to get immunized for H1N1? I will discuss this in the conclusion to this article; see paragraph III.

Do not forget, too,  that there are many ways to strengthen your immunity aside from vaccines.

2.Then there is the issue of pregnant women and vaccines in general:

YOU ABSOLUTELY HAVE TO WATCH this short video of Dr. Blaylock, if you haven't seen it yet, talking about PREGNANT WOMEN and INFLUENZA VACCINES, and their deadly effect on the brain development of fetuses and babies: the whole thing is fascinating and very scary;  it starts at about 8 min. Part I re: pregnant women, on to part II. THIS IS A MUST WATCH. Actually, many, many women aborted after H1N1 vaccination worldwide.

3. The ingredients of Panenza, besides the virus antigen itself:|en&u= ,

 pages 3 and 4 

egg-chicken protein,ovalbumin ( egg- chicken allergy)


octoxynol-9 (<0.02%)

formaldehyde ( 100 mcg)

THIMEROSAL -45 mcg/0.5 cc, p45 dose: IF A MULTIDOSE



gelatin (0.05%)

disodium phosphate dihydrate

Potassium dihydrogen phosphate


Let's look at the most important ones, one by one:

Panenza comes both as a single dose and a multi-dose vaccine. The one commonly recommended for pregnant women and babies till the age of 3 is the single dose. The single dose does not contain Thimerosal, a very toxic ingredient for pregnant women and babies. I don't know which one the Ministry of Health of Israel imported, I hope it is the single dose, in which case the danger of Thimerosal is NOT there, and the comments about Thimerosal can be ignored.

If on the other hand, the M.O.H. purchased the multidose, I would say that they tried to save money at your expense, and if the US decided to offer the Thimerosal-free vaccine, it is incumbent upon Israel to do the same; they shouldn't claim to know better than the FDA.


Despite denials to the contrary by industry and special interests, based on faulty and deliberately biased research, Thimerosal was proven to cause severe damage to the developing brain. We are talking prenatal and postnatal damage. Review the video of Dr. Blaylock above, as well as the following documentation:
There is absolutely no excuse for giving Thimerosal to pregnant women or to young children below the age of 2-3.

The dosage of thimerosal in the multidose is known, and it is very high. 

As regards the following ingredients, the dosage is not mentioned; most of these ingredients are present in trace form, but some of them can still cause damage, even in minute quantities.. I am discussing their presence, not their dosage. 


According to the Australian National Research Council, fewer than 20% but perhaps more than 10% of the general population may be susceptible to formaldehyde and may react acutely at any exposure level.

More hazardous than most chemicals in 5 out of 12 ranking systems, on at least 8 federal regulatory lists, it is ranked as one of the most hazardous compounds (worst 10%) to ecosystems and human health (Environmental Defense Fund).

In the body, formaldehyde can cause proteins to irreversibly bind to DNA. Laboratory animals exposed to doses of inhaled formaldehyde over their lifetimes have developed more cancers of the nose and throat than are usual, as have workers in particle-board sawmills…

Formaldehyde is classifed as a probable human carcinogen by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and as a known human carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer.

Formaldehyde: Formaldehyde is a class 1 carcinogen, labelled by the Environmental Protection Agency in the US as a 'hazardous waste.'


Frankly, I doubt very much that Sanofi-Pasteur can claim ignorance about the anti-fertility aspect of Octoxynol-9, considering that it is a known spermicide, that so many articles have been written about glycol ether and resulting sperm abnormalities;,+anti-fertility+research&spell=1

and considering Sanofi-Pasteur's infamous history as a producer of false label anti-fertility vaccines for Third World women.
See my article "Bird's Eye View on H1N1..." for details. 

Spermicides (Vaginal)This monograph includes information on the following:

1) Benzalkonium Chloride  *
2) Nonoxynol 9
3) Octoxynol 9

Primary: GU400

Commonly used brand name(s): Advantage 242; Because2; Conceptrol Contraceptive Inserts2; Conceptrol Gel2; Delfen2; Emko2; Emko Pre-Fil2; Encare2; Gynol II Extra Strength Contraceptive Jelly2; Gynol II Original Formula Contraceptive Jelly2; K-Y Plus2; Koromex Cream3; Koromex Crystal Clear Gel2; Koromex Foam2; Koromex Jelly2; Ortho-Creme2; Ortho-Gynol3; Pharmatex1; Ramses Contraceptive Foam2; Ramses Crystal Clear Gel2; Semicid2; Shur-Seal2; VCF2.

& Labeling


•May contain harmful impurities
•Sensitizer - can instigate immune system response that can include itching, burning, scaling, hives, and blistering of skin, or severe respiratory reaction

•Listed on labels as:

Octoxynol 9 contains glycol ether which is toxic and has been directly linked to infertility problems in men. Namely low sperm count, abnormally shaped sperm and sperm with poor motility. Painters and decorators in particular have been warned not to work with paints containing glycol.

Octoxynol-10 (or 9):Detergent

Octoxynol 9 (or 10) typically contain traces of the toxins ethylene oxide, dioxane, C9 phenols, or glycol ether.
Detergents and emulsifiers promote tumors and cause cells to leak or explode by weakening their walls, with no mechanism for regulating destructive activity.  Detergents ...more
Octoxynol 9 (or 10) typically contain traces of the toxins ethylene oxide, dioxane, C9 phenols, or glycol ether.
Detergents and emulsifiers promote tumors and cause cells to leak or explode by weakening their walls, with no mechanism for regulating destructive activity.  Detergents are used extensively in cell research precisely because of their ability to break cells open for further analysis.  This catastrophically mimics the membrane attack complex (MAC).


membrane attack complex

Injected detergents trespass on an immune process that holds life and death control over cells...

There are two major aspects to the body's
immune system:

• The '
adaptive' immune system -- this includes various lymphocytes, such as B cell and T cells, and antibodies

• The '
innate' immune system -- this includes various leukocytes, such as phagocytes and natural killer cells, and the use of inflammation and the Complement system

Complement system is a chain-reaction of biochemical events that help remove pathogens from the body.

The Membrane Attack Complex (
MAC) is part of the Compliment system -- and it is one of the immune system's ultimate weapons.

When an invading pathogen is identified, signals are sent causing MAC proteins to collect onto the pathogen's surface membrane. These proteins form ring structures which tunnel through the membrane.

In other words, the MAC puts holes in the invading cell.

These holes cause the cell to leak or explode by weakening its membrane. The cell dies quickly.

Killing cells by punching holes into them makes the MAC extremely potent -- and also extremely destructive if it runs out of control.

For this reason the MAC (and the Complement system in general) is tightly regulated by additional proteins.


Detergents are used during the manufacture of flu vaccines.

These chemicals are not completely purified out of the final product, so they enter the body at the time of injection.

Understanding the MAC helps explain the harm caused by injected detergents.

Just like the MAC, detergents cause cells to leak or explode.

But detergents are unregulated. Detergents act like the MAC
out of control.

The MAC targets foreign cells and avoids self-cells -- detergents hit cells at random.

The MAC responds to signals which call off the attack -- detergents continue destroying cells.

The MAC is integrated into the complex (and sensitive) signaling and feedback relationships between the Compliment system, the overall immune system, and other bodily functions in general -- detergents are foreign to these relationships and disrupt them.


The MAC operates as part of the Complement system. When activated, the Complement system
triggers events such as

• Increased arachidonic acid metabolism leading to acute inflammation and damage to nearby tissue

• Histamine release with its
effects on allergic response, digestion, and neurotransmitter function

• Pyrogen release and the
onset of fever

These are normal immune responses, but autoimmune disorders and other diseases arise when the responses become overactive.

Examples of illnesses directly
linked to severe MAC activity include

These maladies illustrate the consequences of MAC overactivity -- and hence illustrate consequences to be expected from injected detergents.

Detergents represent the worst kind of autoimmune dysfunction -- they randomly destroy *any* kind of host cell with no mechanism for regulating destructive activity.


As mentioned above, the MAC is regulated by certain proteins. One of these proteins is labeled CD59. It protects a host cell by binding to its surface and preventing MAC structures from assembling.

Loss of CD59 protection leaves the cell vulnerable to damage and lysis (a ruptured membrane).

Here are some examples of conditions directly
linked to loss of CD59

  • Damaged neuromuscular transmission junctions

  • Rheumatoid arthritis

  • Kidney disease

  • Stroke

  • Fatal cerebral hemorrhage

These conditions indicate the kind of damage that can be done by injected detergents -- they have no regard for cells protected by CD59 or other regulating proteins.


How fast do detergents leave the body? Do they just keep causing damage until they are somehow metabolized and eliminated?

Carrying out studies to investigate the metabolic fate of detergents injected into humans would be unethical. Clues must be gathered from other kinds of studies in order to understand the rate at which injected detergents leave the body.

studies indicate

• Detergents are not easily metabolized and may remain in the system for lengthy periods

• Elimination is dependent on P450 enzymes and the liver -- which may also be damaged in the process

• Breakdown products include octylphenols which

  • Are more persistent

  • Are endocrine disruptors

  • Depress immune function

  • Deplete glutathione

  • Induce cell death (apoptosis)

  • Pass through breast milk


According to GlaxoSmithKline a 0.5 ml dose of
Fluarix may contain up to 0.085 mg of Triton X-100.

It proved too difficult to find the specific gravity for Fluarix so calculating the level of Triton X-100 in parts per million (ppm) isn't easily possible.

this gives the molecular weight of Triton X-100 as 250.376 g/mol.

Performing unit conversion along with the
Avogadro constant gives

Fluarix detergent exposure

That's 200 thousand trillion molecules of Triton X-100 injected in a dose.

That's an opportunity for trillions of self-cells to be injured or killed by the detergent, resulting in symptoms and diseases in line with what is described above.

Exposure is likely to be similar with other vaccines containing detergents.


If someone has a SNP (single nucleotide polymorphism) of -/+, +/-, or -/- for
HGNC:1689 expression of CD59 they may be especially vulnerable to disruptions and damage caused by detergents.

SNPs in other Complement system regulators would also make a person more vulnerable to these effects.


Normally, phagocytes consume injured cells, dead cells and their fragments after MAC activity.

But phagocytosis will not necessarily take place after a self-cell is injured (not completely destroyed) by a detergent.

Just postulating for a moment: What if the detergent weakens but does not destroy a cell. And what if this injured cell (perhaps it's a stem cell) becomes cancerous? Further, what if this cell is self-protected by CD59 or other control proteins?

In that scenario the self-protected cancer cell could have favorable conditions to proliferate.

That would offer a mechanism for explaining why detergents have been observed to promote tumors (as cited

That idea is not so far-fetched when considering that cancer cells
express CD59 and other MAC inhibitors.


Sea anemones and malaria-transmitting mosquitoes also make use of MAC-like proteins to
breach their victim's cells.


It has been
demonstrated that antibiotics work by disrupting cell membranes, too.

Here is an image of 3 red blood cells after exposure to an antibiotic. Yellow represents where the cell membranes are disrupted or interacting with the antibiotic.

This image can help further visualize the effect detergents can have on cells.


Detergents are used
extensively in cell research precisely because of their ability to break cells open for further analysis.

Here are cells permeabilized by Triton 100-X.

HeLa cells permeabolized by Triton 100-X     HeLa cells permeabolized by Triton X-100     Firefly antibody permeabolized by Triton X-100

Does it really make sense to knowingly inject these chemicals into pregnant women, babies, children, the immune compromised, the elderly --- or anyone else?


Neomycin and other antibiotics: These suppress the immune system, leaving one more susceptible to colds and viruses. Some people are also allergic to them. Repeated use of antibiotics can render them ineffective against major illnesses such as meningitis. They have also been linked with the rise in allergies such as asthma and eczema.








Read the whole article, if you understand French, it is definitely worth it. Very professional, and is telling the truth. SEE what these vaccines do to people. Is it really worth it to take them for a rather benign and elusive infection that is waning as it is?


Grippe A (H1N1): les vaccins pandémiques européens au moins quatre fois plus dangereux que leurs homologues américains

L'Agence européenne des médicaments (EMEA) a publié le 16 décembre son troisième bulletin hebdomadaire de pharmacovigilance sur les trois vaccins pandémiques qu'elle a autorisés, Celvapan, Focetria et Pandemrix, et sur l'antiviral Tamiflu.

Il s'agit d'un bilan des données collectées par le système EudraVigilance dans l'Espace économique européen (EEE) jusqu'au 6 décembre, ainsi que d'informations fournies par les Etats Membres et les compagnies pharmaceutiques distribuant les produits.

Le premier bulletin, publié le 3 décembre, faisait le point jusqu'au 27 novembre, et le second, publié le 9 décembre, jusqu'au 1er décembre.

Au 27 novembre, un total de 3832 rapports d'effets indésirables avaient été transmis à EudraVigilance pour un nombre de personnes vaccinées estimé à environ dix millions, soit un taux de signalement de 38,32/100 000 ou 383,2 par million (82 aux USA à la date du 24 novembre, pour un échantillon de 46,2 millions de doses de vaccin distribuées et a priori administrées, soit un taux de quatre à cinq fois moindre).

Au 1er décembre, le nombre de rapports d'effets indésirables depuis l'autorisation des trois vaccins examinés atteignait 5301, pour un nombre de personnes vaccinées estimé à au moins 15,5 millions, soit un taux de signalement de 34,2/100 000, c'est-à-dire toujours plus de quatre fois plus qu'aux Etats-Unis.


Dès le premier bulletin, douze décès étaient rapportés, aucun nouveau cas n'est signalé par la suite. Le taux de décès passe donc de 0,27 (dix fois le taux américain) pour les deux premiers bilans à 0,14 pour le dernier( about Focetria)

Selon l'EMEA, la plupart de ces décès s'expliquent probablement par des pathologies sous-jacentes (troubles cardiovasculaires, alcoolisme, maladie pulmonaire obstructive chronique, insuffisance rénale). Un rapport fait état d'une méningo-encéphalite aiguë chez un patient de 64 ans....

Les taux de décès correspondants sont de 0,97 pour 100 000 personnes vaccinées, 0,54 et 0,33 (20 fois le taux américain au 1er décembre, 35 fois plus le 27 novembre, et encore 12 fois plus pour le dernier bilan) ( about Pandemrix) .....

L'adjuvant au squalène de GSK, l'AS03, qui n'a jamais été testé, pourrait donc être le plus grand responsable des réactions mortelles observées pour le Pandemrix.

L'apparition de troubles neurologiques après la vaccination semble donc liée au matériel viral contenu dans le vaccin bien plus qu'à n'importe quel autre de ses composants.

Pour le Panenza, 258 effets indésirables (1,8 pour 10.000) ont été notifiés depuis le début de la vaccination avec ce vaccin. 11 des 31 cas graves sont intervenus depuis la dernière semaine, notamment chez des femmes enceintes, avec 3 morts intra-utérines (8 tous vaccins confondus depuis le début de la campagne). Des investigations sont en cours.


Now that the public has been alerted to the dangers of adjuvanted vaccines, the Ministry of Health wants to convince the population to take the non-adjuvanted vaccine, PANENZA.

As I said earlier:

The question is: is it really necessary at this stage to get immunized for H1N1? Please read the discussion about this question in paragraph II 1. 

And take a good look at the following pages, taken directly from the website of the Ministry of Health of Israel:

You can see that the rate of influenza infection in Israel has already come down significantly from earlier this year, and is now within the expected range for this time of year, albeit a different strain, the H1N1 strain.

Not only that, but the peak in influenza infection we saw this year was almost identical to a similar peak seen in the summer of 2008: did you hear any hysterical cries of pandemic then? Did you hear of deaths almost every day in the media then? Of course not: there was no POLITICAL will then, while there is a very strong political will now, coming from the WHO.

Considering these circumstances, I don't see why anybody would want to endanger themselves in taking potentially toxic substances, when the flu season is almost over, and this vaccine will NOT protect against either another future strain, or even the same mutated strain, most likely, should such a strain appear in the future.

My advice would be: don't waste your time, don't waste the government's money. Let them try to return these vaccines, just like France just did, and many other countries are doing.

But that is only my advice of course; you should do what you think is best for you and your family, and CHECK WITH YOUR OWN DOCTOR. After all, I am not currently licensed in Israel, despite years and years of medical practice treating many flu patients, as you can only imagine; so my advice doesn't count, as I am not currently treating patients, and doctors in the field are better able to judge facts on the ground. 

But do not forget that there are many natural ways to strengthen your immunity besides vaccines.

With this in mind, pay attention to the following:

Panenza is definitely better than an adjuvanted vaccine, however:

  • 1. Panenza WITH Thimerosal ( MULTIDOSE) is bad for pregnant women and babies till the age of 3. 
  • 2. Panenza WITHOUT Thimerosal ( single dose) is NOT recommended below the age of 6 months according to the insert.
  • and there are NO DATA on pregnant women as to safety, according to the insert . 
  • In addition, vaccination in general is not recommended for pregnant women in the second and third trimester ( and is actually contra-indicated in pregnant women, period - see reports of miscarriages in "comments"), as it damages the developing brain of the baby ( in case of EXTREME need, the pros and cons would have to be weighed, though, I would think). 
  • On the other hand, it seems that the thimerosal-free vaccine could be given to nursing mothers  - but there is still the issue of excreted Octoxynol -9 metabolites in breast milk; I am not sure quite how bad that is: it is known, though, that they don't break down easily and are harmful.
  • it is bad for MEN of family building age - it contains a sterilizing agent for men, as it damages sperm - I am not sure in what concentration, though, to be honest, and whether the effect is permanent or temporary. Apparently Octoxynol-9 is NOT readily eliminated from the body, see # II 3.C above: 
  •  Detergents are not easily metabolized and may remain in the system for lengthy periods, therefore the question should also be asked: and what about young boys? What about nursing babies? 
  • It can also be conducive to allergic reactions and other health problems including cancer in whoever is left out of this list, which is essentially non-pregnant females , and old men - the latter already having a naturally acquired immunity to H1N1 anyway. 
  • 3. I personally would avoid Thimerosal at any age. 
    After you read this report, you can decide whether to take the vaccine Panenza or not. But at least, you should be informed of the dangers involved.
    • As far as HUMENZA, I would not touch it with a ten foot pole.
    Note also that just a couple of days ago, an article came out about France, which is canceling its contract with the pharmaceutical companies to the tune of 50 million doses. Obviously France knows something you are not being told; should they dump their refuse on YOU??? And by the way, many other countries are doing the same. Sanofi-Pasteur, GSK and Novartis are eagerly waiting for unaware, naive and/or contract-bound countries to take up the slack where France and other informed countries are leaving, and they are not ashamed to say so.Do you want it to be at YOUR expense???

     "France cancels 50 million flu shot orders

    Monday, January 4, 2009 4:42pm EST
    PARIS (Reuters) - France has canceled over half the flu vaccines it ordered to combat the H1N1 flu virus, Health Minister Roselyne Bachelot said on Monday, in an effort to head off criticism after reserving too many shots.
    France ordered the vaccinations from Sanofi-Pasteur, a unit of Sanofi-Aventis, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis and Baxter International.
    The government estimated 94 million individual shots were needed, thinking that everyone would need two jabs for immunity against the illness.
    Doctors now say a single vaccination is sufficient, meaning that France, with a population of some 65 million has a massive oversupply and is already trying to sell on some of the surplus shots it has received.
    "I have canceled 50 million doses," Bachelot said on TF1 television.
    "These orders had not been paid for or delivered so they are canceled," she added.
    The Health Ministry said it had originally bought the 94 vaccines at a cost of 869 million euros. Bachelot said the canceled order would save more than 350 million euros.
    Opposition politicians have criticized the government, saying it has wasted money and helped drugs companies. Socialist Party spokesman Benoit Hamon said large pharmaceutical firms were "the big winners in this affair."
    A Sanofi-Aventis spokesman said on Monday that the company and the government had started a review of a contract for 28 million vaccine doses before the Christmas holidays.
    About half of the doses had been delivered he said but it was premature to comment on the implication of the canceled order for the company. Some five million people in France have so far been vaccinated against H1N1, health officials say.
    The flu virus has killed an estimated 198 people on mainland France, according to data released on December 29, but doctors have said new infections have fallen sharply in recent weeks.
    (Reporting by Thierry Leveque and Noelle Mennella; Writing by Anna Willard; Editing by Jon Boyle)"

    I wish you a smart decision-making.

    Daisy J. Stern, MD, COPYRIGHT 2010


    Thanks to everybody for your support! It is good to hear positive feedback after the hatred that was thrown at me last time. Yasher Koach to all of you; and G-d bless you all.

    Miriam wrote:

    I can feel how frustrated you might be with these ignorant and dangerous people.
    What you are doing right now is greatly beneficial to so many people and you are
    probably saving more lives than when you were practicing. Your advice does count.

    All the best.

    Sylvain wrote:

    Dear Dr. Stern, Thanks for your article, keep me informed of future articles you write in ISRAEL TRUTH TIMES.

    E. wrote:

    ...You did great work.

    Joel's sister said:

    Even as I was reading this, there was an ad on the radio for flu shots at Walgreens.  I hear that several times a day and see it on TV.  They are having a hard time getting rid of it because people got smart and didn't fall for all the hype and scare talk.  Daisy says the US version is less toxic than the Euro. It appears the Euros only had about 33% and some countries less or not at all.  The Jews should make Daisy a national hero!  Her alert should be a real wake-up call to all who read it.

    SHmuel said:

    DR. Stern and our friend as well, known as Daisy,
    You have done a terrific job disclosing details to everyone willing to learn.  Naturally people will make their own decisions but by the looks of it, not many will run to vaccinate with vaccines including extra poisons in the process.



    David Ben-Ariel said...

    Thank you for your extensive time and research on this dangerous scam. I did not get the flu shot.

    What "crisis" will they manufacture next to pimp their drugs and further their agenda? It's distressing to see how many sheeple get swayed by the hysteria and line up, as directed.

    Anonymous said...

    We can't seem to find the end of your never-ending post. I chose also not to vaccinate, hoping it's the right decision for my family as well.I don't know if this constitutes sacanat nefesh though.Meanwhile, thanks for the research. Do you have a prevention plan or plan b in case you or someone you know contracts this virus?

    DS said...

    Thanks, David, for your appreciation of my work.

    Anonymous: if you bothered to read the intro, you would have seen that I recommended to lazy people - is that you? - to simply go to the CONCLUSION to find out what I recommend. Did you do that? Usually a conclusion is at the end of an article, and I think, in order to reach the end, you usually have to scroll down. Did you try that?

    The endless post, as you say, was written for people such as Professor Engelhard and other professionals, who would expect sources and details. I provided that, but in my own style. I realize not everybody is a medical professional, and not everybody has the interest or patience to read every detail.

    At any rate; thanks for the appreciation for my research as well. It DOES take work to get you the information.

    For preventive measures etc., go to Chapter 18 of my article, BIRD'S EYE VIEW ON H1N1, at:


    DS said...



    Greg Princeton said...

    Quite researched topic.

    Unknown said...

    Thank you for your very informative post, as a medical doctor (OB/GYN) who has to decide whether to vaccinate my pregnant patients I had trouble getting all the right info. 2 remarks though:
    1) It seems that based on epidemiologic studies which comapre the H1N1 virus to the one responsible of the great SAPNISH flu pandemia, they expect another big wave coming this february, with real winter
    2)It (the H1N1 virus) does kill young and healthy people, especially pregnant women, I personally know of 2 cases.
    Therefore I do recommend taking the single dose Thimerosal-free and squalene free PANENZA shot.
    I took it myself now, (note that before that I was against the other one available on the market neither took it nor gave it to my patients)

    DS said...

    Dear Hava-Yael,

    I thank you for your comment, and I respect your opinion as an Ob-Gyn responsible for the health of the mother. However, don't you think that the baby also deserves to live? Reports are coming in that FIRST TRIMESTER vaccines also cause miscarriages. I don't know if the women mentioned in these stories took the adjuvanted or non-adjuvanted vaccine;I would think not, since the adjuvanted vaccine is not being given in the US, and a lot of those stories come from there.

    Read about these accounts, and then decide: is it worth the price? And this is only a very small portion of the stories I have read.

    9 New Stories Of Pain And Loss From Pregnant Women Who Lost Their Babies After Receiving The H1N1 Vaccine,

    from the FLU Case.