ISRAEL TRUTH TIMES

A blog dedicated to investigating events as they occur in Judea and Samaria, in Israel and in the world, and as they relate to global powers and/or to the Israeli government, public figures, etc. It is dedicated to uncovering the truth behind the headlines; and in so doing, it strives to do its part in saving Judea and Samaria, and by extension, Israel and the Jewish People, from utter destruction at the hands of its many external and internal enemies.

Wednesday, April 27, 2011

Post-Pessach musings: Israel and the media, media bias, and what we should do about it. Even Israelis are starting to wake up... could it be???

Ben Yosef Livnat, murdered by PA "policemen", American trained, mind you. It's all his fault, of course.

 

Are the media biased?

Most if not all major media, both in the US and in Israel, are controlled by corporations and individuals with clear allegiances to the PTB, i.e. the CFR, the UN, and/or the Vatican, and therefore follow their agenda. They, in turn, want us to return to the "Auschwitz borders". The ultimate goal: to finish the job that Hitler started.


The New York Times as an example:

Their role in the Holocaust, and how they contributed to the death of innumerable Jews:

Buried by the Times: The Holocaust and America's Most Important Newspaper 

 May 2005

The New York Times consistently buried Holocaust news in its back pages and downplayed the victims' Jewish identity. So states the first scholarly study of how the Times covered the Nazi genocide. Buried by The Times: The Holocaust and America's Most Important Newspaper," by Prof. Laurel Leff, has just been published by Cambridge University Press.
Among the book's key findings, according to The David S. Wyman Institute for Holocaust Studies, are the following:
* Holocaust news was consistently relegated to the Times' back pages. Of the 1,186 articles that the Times published during 1939-1945 about Europe's Jews, only 26 (about two percent) of them appeared on the front page, and even those articles "obscured the fact that most of the victims were Jews."
* New York Times publisher Arthur Sulzberger, an assimilated Jew of German descent, feared that the newspaper would be engaging in special pleading and thus deliberately downplayed news of the Holocaust and the Jewish identity of the victims.
* The Times only rarely published editorials about the annihilation of Europe's Jews, and only once ran a lead editorial about the Nazi genocide.

Stuart Eizenstat, formerly the U.S. ambassador for Holocaust-era issues, called the book "engrossing and important," adding, "One can only wonder in great sorrow how many lives might have been saved if the nation's and the world's conscience had been touched by full and complete coverage by the Times of what remains the greatest crime of world history."

*******************************************************************

The Sultzbergers are Meshumadim:


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthur_Ochs_Sulzberger,_Jr.

Arthur Ochs Sulzberger, Jr. (born September 22, 1951) became the publisher of The New York Times in 1992 and chairman of the board of its owner, The New York Times Company, in 1997, succeeding his father, Arthur Ochs Sulzberger.....

....He was raised an Episcopalian, but no longer observes the religion.....


******************************************************************************



They tightly control the newspaper, therefore its content:


NEW YORK (AP) — A Morgan Stanley investment fund is stepping up its confrontation with The New York Times Co. (NYT) with the submission Wednesday of a shareholder proposal that would urge the company's board to take several steps to "reform" its corporate governance practices.
The proposal, if it is approved at the company's next shareholder meeting, would recommend that the board put to a vote the company's dual-class share structure, which allows members of the Ochs-Sulzberger family to control the company through a special class of stock.
...........................

It would also recommend that the roles of chairman and publisher of the Times' flagship newspaper be separated. Both jobs are currently held by Arthur Sulzberger Jr.....
The Times has defended its governance practices and noted that the longstanding dual-class share provision can only be changed by members of the controlling Ochs-Sulzberger family, who have not signaled that they intend to do so.

*******************************************************************************

Such votes are essentially symbolic because the Ochs-Sulzberger family controls most of the voting stock.

In a speech, Sulzberger said the dual-class structure protects long-term stability and has resulted in a "very strong stock price" in the past.

"It is not an accident that what are generally agreed to be the three best newspapers in the U.S. -- The Times, The Wall Street Journal and The Washington Post -- all have this capital structure in common," he said.


************************************************************************************************
http://www.newsweek.com/2009/05/12/all-the-news-that-s-fit-to-buy.html

"Sulzberger is chairman of the company, but more importantly the leading member of the Sulzberger-Ochs family, which has controlled the publishing company for 113 years."


************************************************************

 
The Sultzberger family are fully affiliated with the PTB.

Their loyalties are to the Council on Foreign Relations, 



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-FPAQlbmlSc

Arthur Hays Sulzberger                BB/CFR/J
Arthur Ochs ("Punch") Sulzberger         CFR
Cyrus L. Sulzberger                   BB/CFR
Hays Sulzberger                          CFR
Ochs Sulzberger                          CFR

********************************************************************************

Who is who in the Sultzberger family: Family tree with pics

http://nymag.com/news/articles/08/10/20081013_sulzberger.pdf


********************************************************************************

... In the words of one professional, fierce - and Jewish - critic: the NY Times is anti-Semitic - and certainly anti-Israel:

http://jbuff.com/c031507.htm  Professor Gerhard Falk:

"Today, The Times pretends not to know that Hamas, the Arab terrorist gang, seeks to kill all Jews, wherever they may be. Instead, The Times portrays this gang of killers as a social service organization. Likewise, Hizbollah, another Nazi Arab gang of murderers, is labeled by The Times as a social, agricultural and welfare organization."
*********************************************************************************


And now, about the PTB's methods:
  • 21 Feb 2011 ... What Makes Communication Strategic? – Preparing Military Organizations for the Battle of Ideas Jan TECHAU Research Paper
file:///C:/DOCUME~1/Daisy/LOCALS~1/Temp/rp_65.pdf


*********************************************************************************


... And how their methods are reminiscent of Hitler's methods.....


"The function of propaganda does not lie in the scientific training of the individual, but in calling the masses' attention to certain facts, processes, and necessities, whose significance is thus for the first time placed within their field of vision. The whole art consists in doing this so skillfully that everyone will be convinced that the fact is real, the process necessary, the necessity correct."
-- Hitler

http://www.psywarrior.com/Goebbels.html


German Nazi Party member Joseph Goebbels became Adolf Hitler's propaganda minister in 1933, which gave him power over all German radio, press, cinema, and theater.....
His work as a propagandist materially aided Hitler's rise to power in 1933.



As Reichsminister for Propaganda and National Enlightenment, Goebbels was given complete control over radio, press, cinema, and theater; later he also regimented all German culture. Goebbels placed his undeniable intelligence and his brilliant insight into mass psychology entirely at the service of his party. His most virulent propaganda was against the Jews.


********************************************************************************



So what can we do about it?

Understand the power of the media, the power of propaganda.

COPY what the enemies of the Jewish People are doing, doing exactly what they are doing, using their very own methods.

Buy radio stations, broadcast.

Go on YouTube, start your own channel. If you can, start a TV station broadcasting TRUTH.

Write blogs.

Use Facebook and other social media.

Go on speaking tours.

COMMUNICATE, COMMUNICATE, COMMUNICATE.

TELL THE TRUTH, shine light on the deceivers:


"In a time of universal deceit, TELLING THE TRUTH is a revolutionary act."
-- George Orwell



*************************************************************************
 

Even the Israelis are starting to get it, who would have thought:


http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/143702

Major General (reserves) Uzi Dayan, re: the gruesome murder of Limor Livnat's nephew at Kever Yosef on Motsaei Shabbat:

"To my sorrow the media.... sets the agenda. ..... It is necessary to follow the security agenda rather than the media agenda..."

Friday, April 15, 2011

Sure is interesting!

Libya all about oil, or central banking?
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/MD14Ak02.html
By Ellen Brown

Several writers have noted the odd fact that the Libyan rebels took time out from their rebellion in March to create their own central bank - this before they even had a government. Robert Wenzel wrote in the Economic Policy Journal:
I have never before heard of a central bank being created in just a matter of weeks out of a popular uprising. This suggests we have a bit more than a rag tag bunch of rebels running around and that there are some pretty sophisticated influences.
Alex Newman wrote in the New American:
In a statement released last week, the rebels reported on the results of a meeting held on March 19. Among other things, the supposed rag-tag revolutionaries announced the "[d]esignation of the Central Bank of Benghazi as a monetary authority competent in monetary policies in Libya and appointment of a Governor to the Central Bank of Libya, with a temporary headquarters in Benghazi."
Newman quoted CNBC senior editor John Carney, who asked,
"Is this the first time a revolutionary group has created a central bank while it is still in the midst of fighting the entrenched political power? It certainly seems to indicate how extraordinarily powerful central bankers have become in our era."

Another anomaly involves the official justification for taking up arms against Libya. Supposedly it's about human rights violations, but the evidence is contradictory. According to an article on the Fox News website on February 28:
As the United Nations works feverishly to condemn Libyan leader Muammar al-Qaddafi for cracking down on protesters, the body's Human Rights Council is poised to adopt a report chock-full of praise for Libya's human rights record.
The review commends Libya for improving educational opportunities, for making human rights a "priority" and for bettering its "constitutional" framework. Several countries, including Iran, Venezuela, North Korea, and Saudi Arabia but also Canada, give Libya positive marks for the legal protections afforded to its citizens - who are now revolting against the regime and facing bloody reprisal.
Whatever might be said of Gaddafi's personal crimes, the Libyan people seem to be thriving. A delegation of medical professionals from Russia, Ukraine and Belarus wrote in an appeal to Russian President Dmitry Medvedev and Prime Minister Vladimir Putin that after becoming acquainted with Libyan life, it was their view that in few nations did people live in such comfort:
[Libyans] are entitled to free treatment, and their hospitals provide the best in the world of medical equipment. Education in Libya is free, capable young people have the opportunity to study abroad at government expense. When marrying, young couples receive 60,000 Libyan dinars (about 50,000 US dollars) of financial assistance. Non-interest state loans, and as practice shows, undated. Due to government subsidies the price of cars is much lower than in Europe, and they are affordable for every family. Gasoline and bread cost a penny, no taxes for those who are engaged in agriculture. The Libyan people are quiet and peaceful, are not inclined to drink, and are very religious.
They maintained that the international community had been misinformed about the struggle against the regime. "Tell us," they said, "who would not like such a regime?"

Even if that is just propaganda, there is no denying at least one very popular achievement of the Libyan government: it brought water to the desert by building the largest and most expensive irrigation project in history, the US$33 billion GMMR (Great Man-Made River) project. Even more than oil, water is crucial to life in Libya.

The GMMR provides 70% of the population with water for drinking and irrigation, pumping it from Libya's vast underground Nubian Sandstone Aquifer System in the south to populated coastal areas 4,000 kilometers to the north. The Libyan government has done at least some things right.

Another explanation for the assault on Libya is that it is "all about oil", but that theory too is problematic. As noted in the National Journal, the country produces only about 2% of the world's oil. Saudi Arabia alone has enough spare capacity to make up for any lost production if Libyan oil were to disappear from the market. And if it's all about oil, why the rush to set up a new central bank?

Another provocative bit of data circulating on the Net is a 2007 "Democracy Now" interview of US General Wesley Clark (Ret). In it he says that about 10 days after September 11, 2001, he was told by a general that the decision had been made to go to war with Iraq. Clark was surprised and asked why. "I don't know!" was the response. "I guess they don't know what else to do!" Later, the same general said they planned to take out seven countries in five years: Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Iran.

What do these seven countries have in common? In the context of banking, one that sticks out is that none of them is listed among the 56 member banks of the Bank for International Settlements (BIS). That evidently puts them outside the long regulatory arm of the central bankers' central bank in Switzerland.

The most renegade of the lot could be Libya and Iraq, the two that have actually been attacked. Kenneth Schortgen Jr, writing on Examiner.com, noted that "[s]ix months before the US moved into Iraq to take down Saddam Hussein, the oil nation had made the move to accept euros instead of dollars for oil, and this became a threat to the global dominance of the dollar as the reserve currency, and its dominion as the petrodollar."

According to a Russian article titled "Bombing of Libya - Punishment for Ghaddafi for His Attempt to Refuse US Dollar", Gaddafi made a similarly bold move: he initiated a movement to refuse the dollar and the euro, and called on Arab and African nations to use a new currency instead, the gold dinar. Gaddafi suggested establishing a united African continent, with its 200 million people using this single currency.

During the past year, the idea was approved by many Arab countries and most African countries. The only opponents were the Republic of South Africa and the head of the League of Arab States. The initiative was viewed negatively by the USA and the European Union, with French President Nicolas Sarkozy calling Libya a threat to the financial security of mankind; but Gaddafi was not swayed and continued his push for the creation of a united Africa.

And that brings us back to the puzzle of the Libyan central bank. In an article posted on the Market Oracle, Eric Encina observed:
One seldom mentioned fact by western politicians and media pundits: the Central Bank of Libya is 100% State Owned ... Currently, the Libyan government creates its own money, the Libyan Dinar, through the facilities of its own central bank. Few can argue that Libya is a sovereign nation with its own great resources, able to sustain its own economic destiny. One major problem for globalist banking cartels is that in order to do business with Libya, they must go through the Libyan Central Bank and its national currency, a place where they have absolutely zero dominion or power-broking ability. Hence, taking down the Central Bank of Libya (CBL) may not appear in the speeches of Obama, Cameron and Sarkozy but this is certainly at the top of the globalist agenda for absorbing Libya into its hive of compliant nations.
Libya not only has oil. According to the International Monetary Fund (IMF), its central bank has nearly 144 tonnes of gold in its vaults. With that sort of asset base, who needs the BIS, the IMF and their rules?

All of which prompts a closer look at the BIS rules and their effect on local economies. An article on the BIS website states that central banks in the Central Bank Governance Network are supposed to have as their single or primary objective "to preserve price stability".

They are to be kept independent from government to make sure that political considerations don't interfere with this mandate. "Price stability" means maintaining a stable money supply, even if that means burdening the people with heavy foreign debts. Central banks are discouraged from increasing the money supply by printing money and using it for the benefit of the state, either directly or as loans.

In a 2002 article in Asia Times Online titled "The BIS vs national banks" Henry Liu maintained:
BIS regulations serve only the single purpose of strengthening the international private banking system, even at the peril of national economies. The BIS does to national banking systems what the IMF has done to national monetary regimes. National economies under financial globalization no longer serve national interests.
... FDI [foreign direct investment] denominated in foreign currencies, mostly dollars, has condemned many national economies into unbalanced development toward export, merely to make dollar-denominated interest payments to FDI, with little net benefit to the domestic economies.
He added, "Applying the State Theory of Money, any government can fund with its own currency all its domestic developmental needs to maintain full employment without inflation." The "state theory of money" refers to money created by governments rather than private banks.

The presumption of the rule against borrowing from the government's own central bank is that this will be inflationary, while borrowing existing money from foreign banks or the IMF will not. But all banks actually create the money they lend on their books, whether publicly owned or privately owned. Most new money today comes from bank loans. Borrowing it from the government's own central bank has the advantage that the loan is effectively interest-free. Eliminating interest has been shown to reduce the cost of public projects by an average of 50%.

And that appears to be how the Libyan system works. According to Wikipedia, the functions of the Central Bank of Libya include "issuing and regulating banknotes and coins in Libya" and "managing and issuing all state loans". Libya's wholly state-owned bank can and does issue the national currency and lend it for state purposes.

That would explain where Libya gets the money to provide free education and medical care, and to issue each young couple $50,000 in interest-free state loans. It would also explain where the country found the $33 billion to build the Great Man-Made River project. Libyans are worried that North Atlantic Treaty Organization-led air strikes are coming perilously close to this pipeline, threatening another humanitarian disaster.

So is this new war all about oil or all about banking? Maybe both - and water as well. With energy, water, and ample credit to develop the infrastructure to access them, a nation can be free of the grip of foreign creditors. And that may be the real threat of Libya: it could show the world what is possible.

Most countries don't have oil, but new technologies are being developed that could make non-oil-producing nations energy-independent, particularly if infrastructure costs are halved by borrowing from the nation's own publicly owned bank. Energy independence would free governments from the web of the international bankers, and of the need to shift production from domestic to foreign markets to service the loans.

If the Gaddafi government goes down, it will be interesting to watch whether the new central bank joins the BIS, whether the nationalized oil industry gets sold off to investors, and whether education and healthcare continue to be free.

Ellen Brown is an attorney and president of the Public Banking Institute, http://PublicBankingInstitute.org. In Web of Debt, her latest of eleven books, she shows how a private cartel has usurped the power to create money from the people themselves, and how we the people can get it back. Her websites are http://webofdebt.com and http://ellenbrown.com.

Contributed by Jack. Thank you.

Thursday, April 14, 2011

About TRUTH, and the extreme importance of informing people about truth. So please, share these posts! Chag Sameach.

"A really efficient totalitarian state would be one in which the all-powerful executive of political bosses and their army of managers control a population of slaves who do not have to be coerced, because they love their servitude.

To make them love it is the task assigned, in present-day totalitarian states, to ministries of propaganda, newspaper editors and schoolteachers.... The greatest triumphs of propaganda have been accomplished, not by doing something, but by refraining from doing.

Great is truth, but still greater, from a practical point of view, is silence about truth."

-- Aldous Huxley - (1894-1963) Author - Source: forward to Brave New World, 1946 edition.

Contributed by bill, thank you.

Tuesday, April 12, 2011

USURPERS IN TOWN: you can bet these developments are related! Welcome to a new round of terror in Judea and Samaria, which will be protected and abetted by criminal police as usual...

 Did I not tell you about USURPERS OF KING DAVID'S THRONE IN JERUSALEM? Well, here they are, in person, visiting us Erev Pessach - with consequences for all of us to be felt immediately.

Pope Benedikt's right hand man, Juan Carlos of Spain, has sent his son, Crown Prince Felipe, to Jerusalem, Erev Pessach, to come assert their usurped rights - for the papacy, of course, as well as for themselves - over Jerusalem and the Holy Land, and to give orders to Jerusalem to comply with their wishes, or else. The wishes being, of course, to tear our heart out, to divide Jerusalem and the Holy Land of Israel, to give Judea and Samaria to the Arabs, so that Rome can finally rule from Jerusalem, and the Arabs can finally finish the job that Hitler started.

...See who is catering to the usurpers: our whole government is but a front and delegation for those usurpers : THEY WORK FOR ROME. They serve them fully, out of love and out of fear.

 Isn't it time we reinstated our righteous Mashiach, King David's heir, instead? Where are you, Mashiach? We need you!

Juan Carlos's titles include that of King of Jerusalem, check it out here:


So essentially Felipe came here to claim his usurped inheritance and boss us around, and our traitorous president and wimpy PM, Peres and Bibi, gave him a royal welcome, when instead they should be chasing him away with our entire army, as King David would have done in a similar situation. The throne belongs to King David and his descendants, that means Mashiach ben David; it does NOT belong to the so-called 'king of Jerusalem'; any foreign king, power or pope who dares to assert rights to our kingship, who dares dictate to us, should be chased away by the full force of our army, the IDF. What is the IDF doing instead? Welcoming them with pomp and fanfare while withdrawing from Judea and Samaria! What is our government doing instead? Welcoming the usurpers to a royal feast!

Any protests here????? 

What shall we do? What needs to be done? Things to ponder, and suggestions welcome.

 Peres and the Prince: Spanish royalty visits Israel




By LAHAV HARKOV AND GREER FAY CASHMAN 11/04/2011
Crown Prince Felipe and Princess Letizia commemorate 25 years of diplomatic ties at Beit Hanassi, encourage technological cooperation.
Crown Prince Felipe and Princess Letizia of Spain visited President Shimon Peres at Beit Hanassi on
Monday.
The prince and princess visited Israel to commemorate 25 years of diplomatic relations between the
two countries. This is Prince Felipe's first visit to Israel, which comes after Peres' visit with the King
Juan Carlos of Spain in February.
The visiting royals were greeted by an IDF orchestra as well as children who had made aliyah from
Spain, that held Israeli and Spanish flags.
They then attended a meeting with Peres and Spanish Foreign Minister Trinidad Jiminez.
"Israel welcomes you and hopes that your historic visit will help strengthen economic, scientific, 
technological, educational and cultural ties between Spain and Israel," Peres told the prince.
"I would like to thank your father, the King of Spain, and Queen Sophia, for the warm welcome
I received in Spain. King Juan Carlos bravely succeeded to lead Spain to democracy after Franco,
strengthening Spain and turning it into an open, peace-loving country."
Prince Felipe said that Spain is very interested in the technological cooperation with Israel, and
plans to promote this partnership by visiting Tel Aviv University later Monday.
He also asked Peres about the possibility of renewed peace talks

with the Palestinians.
"The gap between Israel and the Palestinians is not large and called be bridged," Peres said.
"There is no replacement for direct negotiations in order to promote the idea of two states for two
nations."Before leaving Israel on Tuesday, the royals will attend a 
breakfast hosted by Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu after 
which they will be given a tour of the Israel Museum by Chief Curator Yigal Zalmona. At lunch 
time they will meet with dignitaries of the Palestinian National Authority in Ramallah. 


Report: PM Considering Pre-emptive Concessions

Nissan 8, 5771, 12 April 11 09:51
(Israelnationalnews.com) Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu is considering a package of political steps and benefits to the Palestinian Authority (PA) to be presented as part of a policy outline in the United States, according to a report in Haaretz. The moves are described as attempts to stop international pressure which is expected after a vote on an independent PA state in September.
The package includes "an additional redeployment of Israel Defense Forces units and more security control will be transferred to the Palestinian Authority. Some B Areas, in which Israel has security authority and the Palestinians only civilian authority, will be transferred to the authority's complete control. In addition, some C Areas, in which Israel has complete control,  will become B Areas," according to the report.
At the same time, Netanyahu intends to advance a return to negotiations via an international conference with the participation of Israel and the PA. His representatives will press Western countries to vote against the proposed PA state.

Yesha Council Slams Reported Concessions

Nissan 8, 5771, 12 April 11 11:14
(Israelnationalnews.com) The Yesha Council of Jewish communities in Judea and Samaria reacted Tuesday to the Haaretz report, that Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu was considering further concessions to the Palestinian Authority, by saying, "Instead of behaving in a level-headed and intelligent way, Israel is sending out signals of panic. This panic is a self-fulfilling prophecy. The Arabs and the international community smell it and, in response, increase the pressure and so forth."
The council statement continued, "In these days, when the south is absorbing the missiles of the previous withdrawal, it's amazing that someone is talking about an additional withdrawal. The correct course is to make it very clear that a unilateral Palestinian step will be answered by our unilateral steps, such as the application of sovereignty on Judea and Samaria or parts of it while activating the levers of political, economic, military and other pressure that the state of Israel has. This is the correct answer and not further concessions."

Israel Police in Nationwide Surprise Drill

Nissan 8, 5771, 12 April 11 09:55
(Israelnationalnews.com) The Israel Police are conducting surprise drills around the country, Tuesday morning, to test their readiness for terror threats. The police stressed that the drill is not expected to affect the routine of civilians.
At the same time, there will be brisk movements of security and other emergency vehicles around the country.

Samaria Woman Survives Road Ambush

Nissan 7, 5771, 11 April 11 10:01
by Gil Ronen
(Israelnationalnews.com) Malkah Mahon of Maaleh Levona in Samaria was the victim of an apparent attempt to murder her Sunday afternoon.
She had just driven out of Maaleh Levona and began heading toward Ariel, to see her son, when she encountered a vehicle with Palestinian Authority license plates apparently trying to carry out a U-turn in a bend in the road. Two Arabs were standing outside the vehicle. They motioned to her, inviting her to drive past them.
Something seemed wrong, however, and Malkah decided to wait for the vehicle to complete its U-turn. 
At that point the two Arabs approached her vehicle and tried to clamber onto it. "I started driving and they started pelting me with rocks and at the same time, the Palestinian car started ramming me several times and tried to knock me off the road," she told Arutz Sheva.
Mahon managed to drive away and to press the distress button in her car. The IDF contacted her and asked her to drive to Eli, where she underwent initial IDF questioning about the event. A representative of the Judea and Samaria police was also present. 
The attackers apparently fled to the nearby village of Sinjel.
Mahon's late son, Evyatar, escaped an attempted abduction at Eli Junction on 2007, and his presence of mind and courage helped security forces arrest the three Hamas terrorists who attacked him. He was killed in a traffic accident a short time later, at age 17.5, on his way back from a trip in the Golan Heights.
Residents of Maaleh Levona noted that this is not the first time that Arabs attempted an ambush against the community's inhabitants. Not long ago, a terrorist dressed as a haredi Jew tried to abduct a woman but a malfunction in his car foiled the attempt.
Judea and Samaria Police spokesman Gil Elhadad told Arutz Sheva that the attack was "very grave" and that "serious" efforts are being made to locate the suspects.



( By the way, this looks like a Moshe Feiglin type of attack: illegal U-turn on the road, attempted murder by ramming of the offending vehicle into the victim's car. This seems to be a common modus operandi lately. Also, notice that it is not the first time the Mahon family has been targeted: is it all coincidental, and if not,why? Who are the Mahon's? Who decided to eliminate them? Obviously they are a very courageous, even heroic family, judging by the behavior of their son, ZT"L , who was learning in the Yeshiva of Itamar - see below - and I would assume they are leaders of their community. Notice that their son was killed in a car accident as well, - maybe only an accident that time, who knows.... Still, the fact that he was earlier the target of an abduction is noteworthy; the question is, who wants to get that family, and why? Coincidences of this nature are rather unlikely, I would think. 

Notice also the name Barghouti appearing twice among the names of the three attempted abductors of Evyatar Mahon in 2007.  Barghouti, Hamas? I thought jailed Marwan Barghouti is a wannabe president of the P.A., a great friend of our leftist traitors, being visited in jail, wined and dined by them any chance they get: no family relation to the attempted abductors? I'd be very surprised. Judging from the source of the report on the abduction, below, I don't doubt for an instant the reporter's ability to spread disinformation - old stuff, but relevant.

So this latest attempted murder, thank God averted, of yet another Mahon family member, this time their mother, is most likely part and parcel of the infamous secret Oslo clauses drafted by King Juan Carlos' and Benedikt's friend, Shimon Peres, &co.)

We have come full circle.


Time to get rid of the traitors. Time to get rid of Chametz.

Happy Pessach.



...Unfortunately, Itamar had a terrible tragedy this week. One of our dear students of our Yeshiva high school, Evyatar Mahon that just graduated a few weeks ago was killed in a car accident. Evyatar was a resident of the community Maale Livonah and was buried in Shilo last night. Just a few months ago, Evyatar, was miraculously saved from an attempted kidnapping by Arab terrorists. Monday night Evyatar hitched a ride home and received a terrible head injury when driver that fell asleep behind the wheel and collided with an oncoming vehicle. He passed away yesterday, Thursday July 12, at around four o'clock. Evyatar, was a very special boy who always had a smile on his face. Evyatar's family, community, teachers, and classmates are all heartbroken. Our Rabbis teach us that when a terrible tragedy takes place, it is a sign from G-d that we must try and elevate ourselves and repent. Let us all take upon ourselves to do good deeds and improve ourselves.

Friday, April 8, 2011

Moshe Feiglin's change of heart : what was it, spiritual enlightenment, or did he finally "get the message"? Bibi also "got the message" last summer at the Plaza Hotel, NY.


Pay attention to the manner in which this 'accident' happened. The driver of the offending vehicle made an illegal U-turn on a solid white line, managed to hit Moshe Feiglin's son's car, for no reason whatsoever of course, but thank God he failed to send the boy to the next world. And thank God the boy lived to tell the story, for all to hear, of how he was attacked by the offending driver. Moshe abandoned politics, and is suddenly a 'changed man', with different views, and of course UNWILLING TO OPPOSE BIBI ANY LONGER. What could have caused this sudden enlightenment of his? I leave it up to you to decide.

If your son, or daughter, or wife,  was hit in such a deliberate manner, and you were a controversial political figure with many enemies in positions of power, wouldn't you "reconsider your views" as well?

Notice also how the TV segment was doctored, how parts of Moshe's statements were cut, with the result that his confession of a change of heart was juxtaposed to his teary-eyed gratitude for people's prayers. The way this is presented, it appears that the reason Moshe changed his mind is because of people's prayers, which made him realize he had been wrong all along. I don't buy this explanation, this is pure cinema, pure illusion. Moshe did not tell us why he had a change of heart, but I think his body language is speaking for him: the man is scared, he is afraid to tell the truth: he has learned his lesson well. 

Welcome to the dirty world of Israeli politics, Moshe.



See also this recent article:

http://israeltruthtimes.blogspot.com/2011/04/pointing-finger-at-amalek-within-israel.html

And this article to remind you of how Bibi got a change of heart too:

http://israeltruthtimes.blogspot.com/2010/07/bibi-part-ii-sorry-to-say-but-duress-or.html

Good comments in the "Comments" section below. Please read!