Monday, August 5, 2013
Caroline Glick gave it to Bibi this time. Who will listen?
August  2, 2013, 10:20 AM
Standing
 next to US Secretary of State John Kerry on Tuesday morning, Justice 
Minister Tzipi Livni gushed that through his indefatigable efforts to 
bring Israeli and Palestinian officials to Washington, Kerry proved that
 "nothing can stop true believers."
As usual, 
the cognitively challenged Livni told us something she hadn't intended 
to say. The term "true believer" was coined by Eric Hoffer in his 
classic work The True Believer from 1951, which Livni has 
obviously not read. Hoffer's epic study of the psychological roots of 
fanaticism described a true believer as a person so fanatically 
committed to a cause that no amount of reality can make him abandon it.
And that just about sums up Kerry, and the man he works for, US President Barack Obama.
Kerry
 visited Israel six times in the four months leading up to the meetings 
in Washington this week, during which Americans, Palestinians and 
Israelis discussed the size of the table they will be sitting around in 
the coming discussions.
During the same four 
months, the Syrian regime used chemical weapons against its opponents on
 multiple occasions. Most recently, they gassed Palestinians in Yarmuk 
refugee camp outside Damascus, killing 22 people.
During those four months, al-Qaida strengthened its control over the Syrian opposition groups fighting the regime.
During
 those four months, the Syrian civil war became a focal point of a wider
 Sunni-Shi'ite religious war that has already spread to Lebanon and 
Iraq. In its post-US-withdrawal role of Iranian satrapy, Iraq has 
allowed Iran to use its territory and airspace to transfer war materiel 
to the Syrian regime.
During those four months,
 the Obama administration decided to begin arming the al-Qaidadominated 
rebel forces. It has also deliberately raised the risk of a 
Syrian-Israeli war by informing the media every time that Israel attacks
 missile sites in Syria.
Also during the four 
months that Kerry obsessed over convincing PLO chief Mahmoud Abbas to 
send his representative to Washington, Egypt experienced its second 
revolution in which, buffeted by millions of demonstrators who filled 
the squares of Egypt's cities, the Egyptian military overthrew the 
US-supported Muslim Brotherhood regime.
The 
Obama administration was quick to jump onto the bandwagon of the first 
Egyptian revolution in January 2011. That revolution led to the 
military's ouster of then-president Hosni Mubarak, a staunch US ally, 
and so paved the way for the totalitarian and deeply popular Muslim 
Brotherhood to rise to power.
When the 
Brotherhood became subject to its own revolution due to its incompetent 
handling of Egypt's failed economy and its single-minded focus on 
transforming Egypt into an Islamist state as quickly as possible, the 
Obama administration was confounded. Speaking to The Wall Street Journal
 this week, a senior administration official expressed complete 
befuddlement at events in Egypt. "None of us can quite figure this out,"
 the official said. "It seems so self-defeating."
And
 that is the thing of it. In its support for the Brotherhood, the 
administration was implementing its wholly unfounded, dead-wrong 
ideological belief that the Muslim Brotherhood is a progressive, 
"largely secular" organization that is dedicated to good works. And now 
that the Egyptian military, supported by about half of the Egyptian 
people, has rejected the Brotherhood, its actions are incomprehensible 
to the Obama administration.
In the face of 
massive documentary evidence, and facts on the ground, (Egypt has run 
out of food, and rather than get them some, overthrown president Mohamed
 Morsi rammed through a totalitarian Islamist constitution), the Obama 
administration still clings to its ideological belief that the Muslim 
Brotherhood is a positive, progressive, "largely secular" organization 
that is devoted to good works for the poor.
So,
 too, in Syria. The administration thinks it is okay to fund the Free 
Syria Army, because its leadership is dominated by the Muslim 
Brotherhood.
Owing to the administration's 
blind faith in its belief that the reason that the US is hated in the 
Muslim world is because it has opposed populist Islamist forces, Obama 
and his advisers think it makes sense to arm those forces in Syria now -
 so long as the Muslim Brotherhood is able to hide the fact that it is 
dominated by al-Qaida for a sufficient number of news cycles to sell 
this fiction to the media.
The administration's
 faith in Islamist reasonableness holds for the Shi'ite Islamists just 
as strongly as it does for the Sunni Islamists. This is why it maintains
 its commitment to negotiating with Iran's fanatical regime about its 
nuclear weapons program, despite overwhelming evidence that the Iranians
 are using the negotiations as a means to develop their bomb in peace.
This
 week David Albright and Christina Walrond at the Institute for Science 
and International Security in Washington published a deeply disturbing 
report. They explained that based on what we know, Iran will reached 
"critical capacity" in its nuclear program by mid-2014. Albright and 
Walrond defined critical capacity as "the technical capability to 
produce sufficient weapongrade uranium from its safeguarded stocks of 
low enriched uranium for a nuclear explosive, without being detected."
Albright
 and Walrond then explained the many ways Iran can speed up the process,
 and hide its achievement from the international community for long 
enough to make it too late to conduct military strikes on their nuclear 
facilities to prevent Iran from becoming a nuclear power.
In
 other words, they told us politely, and diplomatically, if urgently, 
that we have arrived at the moment of decision. Will the US or Israel 
strike Iran's nuclear installations to prevent it from becoming a 
nuclear power, or will Iran become a nuclear power? If we wait much 
longer, we won't have sufficient time to act.
But
 for Kerry and his fellow true believers the most urgent priority was to
 convince the Palestinians to sit in the same room as Israelis. And this
 week they scored a great victory for US foreign policy by achieving 
their goal.
In her brief remarks, not only did Livni inadvertently tell us that Kerry is a fanatic. She also told us that she is a fanatic.
Livni
 said, "[I]t took more than just a plane ticket to be here today. A 
courageous act of leadership by Prime Minister Netanyahu that was 
approved by the Israeli government made this visit here and the 
beginning of the negotiation possible."
The 
"courageous act" she referred to was the government's decision to 
release 104 "Palestinian prisoners" from Israel's prisons. The demand 
for their freedom was the obstacle Abbas placed in the way of Livni 
acquiring her long-sought-after plane ticket to peace talks and five 
star receptions at Kerry's Washington mansion.
The
 104 "prisoners" are made up of Palestinians and Israeli Arabs. They are
 not car thieves or pickpockets. They are monsters with human faces. All
 104 are serving life sentences for murder or attempted murder. Their 
crimes were gruesome acts of barbarism marked by demonic cruelty.
Yusef
 Said al-Al and Ayman Taleb Abu Sitteh stabbed David Bubil and Haim 
Weitzman to death and mutilated their bodies, cutting off their ears as 
souvenirs.
Three other "Palestinian prisoners" hacked four teenagers to pieces, killing them with pitchforks, hatchets and knives.
Thirteen-year-old Oren Baharmi was raped and murdered by Amad Mahmad Jamil Shehada.
And the list goes on and on, and on.
There was nothing even vaguely courageous about Netanyahu's decision to release these monsters.
There
 was nothing even vaguely courageous about his cabinet members' decision
 to vote for their release. Theirs was an act of utter cravenness. They 
dishonored the victims, the victims' families and the nation as a whole.
And
 they endangered the country. According to the Almagor Victims of Terror
 organization, from 2000 to 2005, 180 Israelis were murdered by 
Palestinian terrorists released by Israel in previous "deals." And those
 terrorists had been imprisoned for non-lethal actions, (i.e., without 
blood on their hands).
The fact that Netanyahu 
and his ministers passed this decision simply to provide a sufficient 
payoff to Abbas for him to send Saeb Erekat to Washington to talk about 
nothing with Livni, makes their actions, not only craven, but insane.
Livni's
 obscene characterization of this cowardly, life-threatening injustice 
as a "courageous act," exposes her as well as a true believing fanatic.
Only a fanatic could say such a thing.
In
 his remarks, Kerry said that the talks about the size of the table are 
going to bring about a situation where Israel will achieve, "not just 
the absence of conflict, but a full and lasting peace with the Arab and 
Muslim nations."
Like Kerry's demand that 
Israel free the terrorists, this statement bespeaks an underlying 
fanatical dementia. Regarding the "Arab and Muslim nations," in Syria, 
neither the al-Qaida forces nor the regime have mentioned anything about
 putting down their weapons if Israel coughs up Jerusalem and Elon 
Moreh. The same goes for Hezbollah, Iran and their friends and enemies 
warring for power throughout the region.
As for
 the Palestinians, if they were interested in "lasting peace" with 
Israel, they wouldn't demand freedom for terrorist murderers. Moreover, 
while Kerry was exulting in his brilliant success, Abbas announced that 
in his version of "lasting peace," Jews will be wiped off of the map of 
Palestine.
As Abbas put it, "In a final 
resolution, we would not see the presence of a single Israeli - civilian
 or soldiers - on our lands."
So again, while 
Kerry and Livni see rainbows and unicorns, Abbas sees a Jew-free 
Palestine, with the 600,000 Jews of Jerusalem, Judea and Samaria 
rendered homeless refugees to make room for his anti-Semitic fiefdom.
It
 is not surprising that Kerry, Obama and Livni are going along with this
 obscenity. It is not surprising that fanatics who pray to the god of 
the two-state solution think it is courageous to free Jewish-baby 
killers. It is not surprising they think the most important thing on the
 international agenda is to secure Israel's surrender of land, our legal
 rights, and our ability to defend ourselves to a terrorist group that 
hates Jews so much it requires all of us to be gone before it will do us
 the favor of accepting sovereignty.
What is 
surprising - and frightening - is that Netanyahu, who is not a true 
believer, and knows that they are true believers, is going along with 
this.
Netanyahu knows that Israel cannot 
survive without Judea and Samaria. He knows what the Muslim Brotherhood 
is. He knows the nature of the Iranian regime. He knows that the PLO is 
no different from Hamas. Their goal is the same - they want to destroy 
Israel.
Netanyahu knows that Obama is hostile to Israel and that he will not lift a finger to block Iran from becoming a nuclear power.
So
 why is he going along with their insanity? In bowing to US pressure and
 approving the release of 104 terrorist murderers from prison, Netanyahu
 behaved like a coward. In bowing to US pressure not to bomb Iran's 
nuclear installations, Netanyahu is being a coward.
The most important question for Israel today then is whether our leader is capable of being anything else.
Originally published in The Jerusalem Post. 
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 Posts
Posts
 
 
1 comment:
Maybe Netanyahu was so threatened, as Aaron Klein reports, that he is using the negotiations as a stalling tactic to figure how to disrupt all their efforts? A too early bold action would only bring on greater threats.
Just a thought, not what one wants to hear but a very human reaction.
OR MAYBE, he will bolt Likid altogether, and create a new party of 'traitors' to give away parts of our holy Land?
Post a Comment