This Bix Weir is really super smart! I like the guy and he makes me laugh, and he is worth listening to!

See also this post about him from a few days ago:

http://israeltruthtimes.blogspot.co.il/2017/05/on-another-note-this-guy-is-brilliant.html

I can totally identify with this candid professor of physics: I have experienced very similar reactions since I initiated the vaccine controversy here in Israel in 2009!

This is what happens to people who search for the truth, in whatever field they may find themselves, be it science, be it medicine, be they political whistle blowers, etc., etc.

But see what Rav Berland has to say about this; it is so true: it takes real courage to be a whistle blower, to dare tell the truth when everybody believes propaganda lies, and one pays a stiff price in reputation, financial rewards, sometimes one sacrifices one's freedom or even one's life! But look at the results!

http://en.shuvubanimint.com/accepting-an-insult-lovingly/

“The Rebbe says that in the merit of those who accept upon themselves disgrace, people are saved from getting killed.”

Everything happens in such a timely manner these days, it's magnificent! The Hand of Hashem is here for everyone to see: first the article on the blog Mystical Paths, then the video on Infowars, then the manifest of the physicist, then Rav Berland's Dvar Torah which comes from Rabbi Nachman... everything is  marvelous! Everything fits together just perfectly, on the day of Yesod shebe Netzach of the Omer, the 27th day, whose theme is humility: the Geulah is surely on the way!

Thank you Hashem.

DS

On another note: THIS GUY IS BRILLIANT! He figured it out; so this is how our fake world is being run!? I would say, time for major lawsuits.

Update:

See this new post about him here:

http://israeltruthtimes.blogspot.co.il/2017/05/this-bix-weir-is-really-super-smart-i.html

What is the role of Rome in this blatant and illegal manipulation of the price of silver? Remember, according to Eric Phelps JP Morgan has a direct telex to the Vatican!

Silver Shocker

By: Theodore Butler

Here’s an extended excerpt from the Weekly Review sent to subscribers on March 5 -

The big surprise was in the silver COT, where the big 4 increased their net short position by 3000 contracts on the previously mentioned reduction of 1300 contracts in the total commercial net short position. This increase in the big four’s short position broke the pattern of a reduction in the concentrated short silver position that had been in force for months. The increase in the concentrated short silver position was so unexpected by me that I thought, at first, it must have been a mistake. Since the Bank Participation Report was released late yesterday, an hour or two after the COT, my first thought in the interim was that it would not be JPMorgan increasing its concentrated short position, but most likely the other three entities in the big four. After all, with all the negative attention (and losses) accruing to JPMorgan and its big silver short position, there would be no way JPM would have accounted for the 3000 contract increase in the COT for the big four.

If the silver COT was a surprise, then the Bank Participation Report was a shocker. There was a net increase in the US bank category of 6000 contracts to 25,000 held net short in silver. JPMorgan’s net silver short position, which had decreased by 11,000 contracts over the preceding three months to 19,000, had suddenly ballooned to 25,000 contracts (125 million ounces). From my reading of both these reports, it appears that the big increase in silver short selling by JPM took place during the last COT reporting week, even for the BP Report. Before I continue, let me explain that I consider JPMorgan to effectively account for all or the bulk of the entire US bank category in the Bank Participation Report for a variety of mathematical reasons. However, it matters little if there is another US bank also holding a significant net short position in COMEX silver, as all that would mean is that two US banks are colluding to manipulate the price of silver and not just one bank acting alone.

Two and a half years ago, I had a very similar experience of shock over a Bank Participation Report. This was before anyone knew that the Bank Participation Report even existed. The August 2008 Report caused me to write a series of articles that started with “The Smoking Gun” in the fall of that year. http://news.silverseek.com/TedButler/1219417468.php  In turn, my analysis and writing led to the current CFTC silver investigation (still unresolved) and the revelation that JPMorgan was the big COMEX silver short by way of taking over Bear Stearns. I further believe that the revelation of the true size and nature of the concentrated silver short position has contributed to the current movement towards position limits by the CFTC. 

As much as the August 2008 Bank Participation Report was shocking, the current one is even more so. That’s because we know so much more today than we did back then. We have waited two and half years to hear anyone legitimately explain how a US bank holding a short position equal to 25% of world production isn’t manipulation. No explanation has been forthcoming, nor is it likely to ever be offered. We know now that concentration is the prime requisite for manipulation. To witness the most concentrated participant suddenly increase its silver short position by more than 30% is something almost beyond comprehension.

Let me walk you through the mechanics of what just took place and then I’ll speculate on the motivation of JPMorgan increasing its silver short position so dramatically. Over the past two COT reporting weeks, it has been primarily a commercial versus commercial type affair. The big technical funds have largely refrained from adding to their net long silver position, even though prices have climbed very sharply. Two weeks ago the raptors (the smaller commercials away from the big 8) increased their net short position to 4000 contracts, the highest level in four years. The raptors were selling to the smaller unreported category traders who were buying. This week, the raptors bolted from their entire short position, buying it back completely and leaving them flat (not net long or short). JPMorgan was the sole seller to the raptors’ buying, resulting in the big increase in JPM’s short position.

As far as the motivations behind this trading, the most plausible explanation for the raptors running from their newly initiated big short position is the stark reality that shorting silver has been a very bad deal. My guess is that the raptors did their homework on silver only after they put on the big short and started to lose money on rising prices. That homework persuaded them to get off the short side of silver pronto, which they did. JPMorgan’s motivation for suddenly and greatly increasing its silver short position is less clear and more troubling. My own guess is that the JPMorgan silver trader thought he had no choice but to sell many more contracts short in order to control the price and protect their existing short position. That’s because there was no one else left to sell. If JPMorgan didn’t sell, no one else would have (at prevailing prices). That’s the problem and it goes to the heart of the crime. The raptors didn’t want to sell, nor did the 5 thru 8 large traders. Ditto for basically all the other silver traders. That left JPMorgan as the sole silver seller, as the COT and Bank Participation Reports clearly document. Please think about this.

We know that concentration in any market is to be avoided. The whole thrust of commodity law goes towards preventing concentration. We know that the ideal profile of a free market is where a wide diversity of market participants competes on both the buy and sell sides of the market. We also know that the most extreme state of concentration possible is where there is, effectively, only one buyer or one seller. Therefore, what the latest COT and Bank Participation Reports just confirmed was that the most extreme form of concentration possible just occurred during the latest reporting week.

This is the key point – what would have happened if JPMorgan hadn’t sold short the additional 6,000 silver contracts (30 million oz) when they did? Asked differently, in the current market conditions, what price would have been required to induce other market participants to sell the 6,000 contracts if JPMorgan hadn’t sold? My guess is that would have taken a price over $40 or $50 to attract that much legitimate selling. The fact that JPMorgan was the sole seller is the clearest proof possible that silver has been manipulated.

So egregious was this latest increase in JPMorgan’s short position that I am inclined to think that it may have been done on an unauthorized or rogue trader basis. Perhaps JPM management and the CFTC are not yet aware of it, seeing how recently it occurred.  After all, the COT and Bank Participation Reports were only published less than 24 hours ago. (As is my custom, I will be sending this article to the Commission and JPMorgan and the CME Group).

I realize that I am making serious allegations of violations of commodity law, as there is no market crime more serious than manipulation. At the very least, this new government data release is so disturbing that it should be addressed immediately. Silence on the part of JPMorgan, the exchange and the CFTC is no longer constructive. If my accusations are off-base, then I should be set straight. I’m not out to cause trouble; I am trying to help correct what I see as a very serious market problem.

I can’t help but think that Chairman Gensler of the CFTC will be troubled by this recent action by JPMorgan to substantially increase its already concentrated silver short position. In recent speeches he has indicated his support for position limits to guard against concentration. Please scroll down to the section on position limits in this recent speech to see what I mean. http://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/SpeechesTestimony/opagensler-71.html Chairman Gensler also solicits your public comments on this issue, as I have done previously. I found it interesting that he singled out position limits in this speech for encouraging you to comment. By the way, the number of public comments on position limits is now close to 3,000, a truly remarkable outpouring of public sentiment. http://comments.cftc.gov/PublicComments/CommentList.aspx?id=965 

Please don’t assume that the sharp increase in short selling by JPMorgan is automatically bearish for the price of silver. Yes, such manipulative short selling in the past has led to sharp sell-offs and could again. But things do change and current conditions in silver are vastly different than they have been in the past. While we must be prepared for a sell-off (by not holding on margin), this situation could (and should) blow up in JPM’s face. They are increasingly isolated which makes them both dangerous and vulnerable. Most of you are holding silver from prices much below the current levels. This bestows on you a power that few newcomers to silver possess, namely, the power of a long term perspective and the ability to withstand short term price gyrations. You have a price cushion and the power of knowledge that should enable you to persevere against any short term manipulation. The proper approach is to hold silver to go much higher and not to lose your position, just as it has been all along.

That aside, you should be disturbed enough about the revelations in the new COT and Bank Participation Reports to rattle on the cages of JPM, the CME and the CFTC. Just as a head’s up, I may make portions of this report available in the public domain if I conclude it will benefit subscribers. Let me think about it a bit. In the interim, please contact these parties if you feel so inclined. You know I will.

http://news.silverseek.com/SilverSeek/1299509764.php

• http://z13.invisionfree.com/THE_UNHIVED_MIND/index.php?showtopic=64556

Dear Sister Theresa,

Yes, this video was made by an Irish-American, presumably a Roman Catholic, Mr. Delany. It is an attempt to portray the Mossad (created by the CIA in 1951) and the Israeli Masonic Labor Zionist government (overseen by the Knights of Malta like King Juan Carlos and administered by high Freemasons like Shimon Peres) as a superpower able to bring about the 911 attack and subsequent cover-up. This conclusion is pure anti-Jewish rhetoric intended to incite anti-Jewish fury in order to blame all American Jews in general for the 911 attacks and subsequent papal Crusade into Iraq intended to benefit Rome's revived "Latin Kingdom of Jerusalem."


The facts are these:

1. The attack on the USS Liberty on the fourth day of the Israeli-Arab Six-Day war in 1967 was ordered by Rome. That order was sent to the CIA/NSA via the Archbishop of New York City ruling his American branch of the Knights of Malta controlling both agencies. That diabolic order was enforced by Jesuit-trained Freemason and JFK assassin, President Lyndon B. Johnson---whose best friend was a Roman Catholic priest, Wunibald Schnieder, the priest of St. Francis Xavier Church, Stonewall, Texas. Further, it was LBJ who ordered the recalling of rescue efforts to save the desperate crew of the disabled NSA intelligence gathering ship, USS Liberty. LBJ was the creature of "the American Pope," Francis Cardinal Spellman, that "prince of the church," who put Texas' foremost political serial adulterer in the White House. The ultimate reason for the attack on the USS Liberty was to secure the successful taking of the Old City of Jerusalem from Sunni Islamic Jordan then ruled by another papal asset, Freemason King Hussein---the bosom friend of another high Freemason, George H. W. Bush. The Black Pope's "Unified International Intelligence Community" worked together during the USS Liberty attack in 1967, as it had also done during the pope's assassination of Roman Catholic Knight of Columbus JFK in 1963. This "Unified International Intelligence Community" (which created, financed and now directs all Islamic Terrorist organizations) is nothing more than the Black Pope's "Holy Office of the Inquisition" now operating in perfect synchroneity on a worldwide basis. The perfection of this global Inquisitional Network was one of the preeminent designs of the pope's Cold War Hoax premised upon the Airborne Nuclear War Hoax. The foundation of this international, Roman fascist "Holy Office" was the Jesuit-styled Nazi SS. Post war, Himmler's SS, "the Order of the Death's Head," was saved by Pope Pius XII's Vatican Ratlines (ODESSA) and then successfully used to build both East (KGB/SSD/Egyptian Intelligence) and West (CIA/BND/Israeli Intelligence---Mossad) intelligence agencies to work as ONE at the very top of their echelons.

2. As was the case of the Black Pope's Bolshevik Revolution, the papacy used its Masonic Labor Zionist "Court Jews" to play leading roles in the 911 debacle. Those traitors to their own Hebrew/Jewish/Israelitic race have willingly served the papacy in this crime and subsequent cover-up so as to enable Gentile, Jesuit-controlled operatives to blame the Jews for 911 and the war in Iraq/Iran. Indeed, Michael Chertoff and Viet Dinh were the penlholders of the wicked, unconstitutional "The Patriot Act," but the authors were the Jesuits of Georgetown University at which Viet Dinh is a professor. Just as there were Bolshevist Jews preaching in Yiddish and holding signs in Yiddish throughout St. Petersburg during the Bolshevik Revolution, even so there were Israeli Jews in New Jersey dancing on top of their White van and in the streets. This clearly was a bold attempt to provide irrefutable proof that "it was the Jews" who were behind the Revolution and 911. Both "stage plays" were designed to deceive the innocent, laboring bystander so as to drive him into the arms of the Jesuit rhetoric of Hitler in order to fulfill the "vision of Fatima" (the Nazi Crusade of "Operation Barbarossa" in converting "Communist" (in fact Orthodox) Russia to the pope) as well as to drive all Americans, White and Black, into the arms of the White Fascist New Right and the Black Fascist Nation of Islam. It was no coincidence that the Archbishop of New York who controlled the New York Port Authority leased the WTC to a racial Jew, Larry Silverstein, only three months before the demolition. No one can ever know that Court-Jew Silverstein is a servant of Cardinal Egan.

3. New York City is under the complete and total rule of its Archbishop, Edward Cardinal Egan. In fact, JPII called the previous Archbishop, John Cardinal O'Connor, "the Archbishop of the capital of the World." JP Morgan/Chase is directed by the Knights of Malta, that bank having a direct telex to the Vatican according to Roman Catholic author, Martin Lee. Nothing, and I mean nothing, "goes down" in New York City without the direction or the permission of the Archbishop. Thus, the Jewish/Israeli businesses in New York are resident at the permission of Rome, and their businessmen are usually high-level Jewish Freemasons connected to the Black Pope's Masonic B'nai B'rith.

4. Concerning Jonathan Pollard, he never could had succeeded to the extent of his theft and treason had in not been for his overseer and promoter, Jesuit-trained Knight of Malta and DCI, William J. Casey. Casey was the protector of Pollard until the pope's Masonic Labor Zionists were given all the thousands of top secret files necessary for the "Kingdom of Jerusalem" to keep abreast of the international intelligence game. No Casey, no Pollard---period.

5. The Council on Foreign Relations, based in New York City with a sister office in Chicago (of which Obama's wife is a member), is the semi-secret association by which Rome sends its agents into the US government to control all three of its branches as well as its press, banking, academia, religions, etc. The CFR (the CIA serving as its enforcer according to Roman Catholic CIA officer Victor Marchetti) was mentioned twice during this two-hour video, but many more personages named therein could have been easily connected to the membership roster of the CFR. This was not done and for a reason. Once you finger the vast majority of the Jews in the CFR with the master who rules the CFR, then the game is up and the true purpose of this Jewish/Israeli involvement in 911 is exposed to the light of day. It is no coincidence that one of the advisors to the Archbishop is also a presider in the CFR. That man is the extremely powerful CFR pundit, backer of Mayor Michael Bloomberg and former president of Jesuit Fordham University, Jesuit Joseph A. O'Hare. The CFR will continue to be used to carry out the Black Pope's Council of Trent via the Jesuit Oath; and the Jews involved in the American Empire's papal domestic and foreign policy are merely marionettes of "that man behind the curtain," Jesuit Superior General Adolfo Nicolas.

I trust this critique is sufficient to place the blame for 911 where it rightly belongs---on that antichrist of Rome, Pope John Paul II and his successor, Pope Benedict XVI.

Sincerely in faith,

Brother Eric

• http://news.goldseek.com/GoldSeek/1299264900.php

"INSIDE JOB", an overview. Fast forward to January 2011: fox guarding the chicken coop: instead of doing what needs to be done, Aboma preferred to embed JP Morgan Daley right into the White House.

" Are U.S. metal-shorting banks moving to hide their positions outside the country? "

Are U.S. metal-shorting banks moving to hide their positions outside the country? - SilverSeek.com


Are U.S. metal-shorting banks moving to hide their positions outside the country?

By: Chris Powell and Adrian Douglas

-- Posted 20 December, 2010


Dear Friend of GATA and Gold (and Silver):
GATA Director Adrian Douglas, publisher of the Market Force Analysis letter, today published a letter he has sent to U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission member Bart Chilton, disclosing that even as the gold and silver short positions of U.S. banks have been declining over the last year, gold and silver short positions lately have been increasing dramatically among banks headquartered outside the United States. The strong implication is that the major shorting banks are moving their activities behind foreign fronts, as your secretary/treasurer speculated a week ago well could happen:
http://www.gata.org/node/9420
Douglas' letter to Chilton is headlined "Letter to CFTC Commissioner Chilton on Trends in Bullion Bank Gold and Silver Short Positions" and is shown below.
CHRIS POWELL, Secretary/Treasurer
Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee Inc.

LETTER TO CFTC COMMISSIONER CHILTON ON TRENDS IN BULLION BANK GOLD & SILVER SHORT POSITIONS

By Adrian Douglas
TO: Bart Chilton, Commissioner of the CFTC
From: Adrian Douglas, Director of GATA
Date: Dec 13, 2010


I would like to bring to your attention some very disturbing trends in the BPR before your meeting on December 16th regarding position limits.

In figure 1 below I have charted the silver short position of the US banks (blue line) and the non-US banks (green line and right hand scale) and all reporting banks, US + Non US (red line)

Figure 1

Looking at the trend of the US Bank silver short position it shows that it peaked at the end of 2009 and has been on a declining trend as shown by the blue arrow. At the same time the short position of non-US banks has been declining as shown by the dashed green arrow. But look what has happened since July 2010. There has been a massive increase in the short position of non-US banks. It has increased almost 1000% from 614 contracts in July to 6,329 contracts in December (delta + 5,715). This increase is so large it has more than offset the decline in the short position of the US banks over the same period which has reduced from 31,803 contracts to 26,332 contracts (delta -5,471 contracts). The combined US and Non-US bank short position is shown by the red line and this is now on an increasing trend as shown by the red arrow.

Which non-US bank(s) has increased its short position in silver so massively? What is that entity’s relationship to the US Bank mega-shorts, JPMorgan and HSBC? I know you can’t answer those questions publicly but these are questions the CFTC should be looking into. It looks suspiciously like the US Bank silver short position is being shifted to a bank or banks that are out of the jurisdiction of the CFTC. To further add to my suspicions the Financial Times has out-of-the-blue published an article that declares that JPMorgan is reducing its silver short position on the Comex.

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/7d699ca4-06ea-11e0-8c29-00144feabdc0.html#axzz1834JpsKS

That is impeccable timing don’t you think? And this newspaper has never once mentioned that JPMorgan Chase even holds a massive short position in silver but now confidently declares it is reducing it!

But the irrational exuberance of non-US Banks to suddenly massively short precious metals is not limited to the silver market. They have felt a similar compunction with respect to gold also.

Figure 2

Figure 2 shows the gold short position of the US banks (blue line) and the non-US banks (green line and right hand scale) and all reporting banks, US + Non US (red line). The blue arrow indicates that the US bank gold short position appears to have peaked in July 2010 and has declined from 161,378 contracts to 135,602 contracts (delta -25,776 contracts). However, we see that non-US banks after having been gradually reducing their short position from March 2009 suddenly in July 2010 aggressively increased their short position by more than 200% from 16,798 contracts to 53,120 contracts (delta +36,322). This more than offset by 40% the reduction in the short position of the US banks. As a consequence the short position of all reporting banks (US and Non-US) is now on an increasing trend as indicated by the red arrow.

Again I urge the CFTC to investigate which non-US bank(s) has increased its short position in gold so massively? What is that entity’s relationship to the US Bank mega-shorts, JPMorgan and HSBC?

A review of historical data indicates that non-US banks have not been major participants in the precious metals markets and have generally held fairly balanced positions between short and long holdings. The sudden and massive increase in their short positions in both metals is conspicuous when compared with historical trading patterns. The fact that it occurs at a time when the US banks that are mega-short appear to be covering makes it doubly intriguing. It looks like a strategy to shift suppression and manipulation of the market to banks that are not under the direct supervision of the CFTC. Will these non-US banks be expecting to receive an exemption to position limits where US banks might not be successful?

I consider that these trading patterns warrant investigation by the CFTC.

Best regards,

Adrian Douglas

https://marketforceanalysis.com/index.html

Funny, yet not so funny if you get it.

About silver: Interview With Theodore Butler; this guy really understands his stuff!

Ted Butler: all credit goes to him!

Interview With Theodore Butler

By: James Cook & Theodore Butler

-- Posted 24 November, 2010

Cook: For the past ten years you have been claiming that silver was the best thing people could own. How do you feel now with silver around $25 an ounce?
Butler: I have a sense of relief that I could not possibly have hurt anyone who followed my advice. I also feel intellectually vindicated about the way things are turning out. Lastly, I feel amazed how good silver still looks for further gains.
Cook: How high could it climb?
Butler: Real high, but by now you should know I shy away from specific price targets.
Cook: A lot has been going on with silver lately. Most of the things you’ve written about are starting to happen. What do you think about the recent spate of lawsuits against JPMorgan and HSBC?
Butler: It’s a big deal. The main thing is not the outcome of this case, but rather the fact that they were filed.
Cook: How many lawsuits were filed?
Butler: The latest tally is 25, I’ve been told.
Cook: Why do you think these lawsuits are important?
Butler: It is another confirmation of the growing recognition that silver has been manipulated in price.
Cook: They must be reading your newsletter because everything claimed in the first lawsuit originated with you. Do you agree?
Butler: Yes, I know that for a fact.
Cook: The basis of the lawsuit is that these big banks are short an inordinate amount of silver. How much to be exact?
Butler: It varies over time, but at the time referenced in the lawsuit, JPMorgan, either alone or with another U.S. bank, held short on the COMEX the equivalent of 25% of world annual mine production
Cook: How many ounces is that?
Butler: In most recent CFTC data, it is 150 million ounces, but within the past year it has been over 200 million ounces
Cook: You’re claiming that’s manipulative?
Butler: Absolutely. It would be impossible for such a concentrated short position not to be manipulative. It was this observation that led to the current CFTC silver investigation which, in turn, led to this lawsuit.
Cook: How many ounces are there held short in total?
Butler: The total net short position in COMEX futures is around 550 million ounces, but if you include everything, especially unbacked bank certificates and pool accounts, it grows to 2 or 3 billion ounces.
Cook: Who are these short sellers outside of the big one or two?
Butler: On the COMEX, there are about 8 commercial entities short over 300 million ounces, including the biggest.
Cook: They got squeezed pretty good when silver hit $29, didn’t they?
Butler: You bet.
Cook: How big have the losses been for the shorts?
Butler: In silver, the big 8 were out over $3 billion at the top, and more than $5 billion if you include all the shorts.
Cook: You pointed out that there had to be a lot of margin calls, when gold is included, what’s the total?
Butler: All in all, almost $15 billion.
Cook: They actually had to cough up $15 billion?
Butler: Absolutely. That’s a key component of the clearinghouse system.
Cook: Did anybody fail to make their margin calls?
Butler: It’s hard to tell.
Cook: I thought the price rise to $29 might have been because some folks couldn’t make margin calls and the brokerage firm bought back their position. No?
Butler: I’m certain there was a lot of that; they liquidate the contracts to satisfy the margin calls.
Cook: They don’t mess around do they?
Butler: This is basic commodity stuff. As a customer, if you don’t meet your margin calls your broker will liquidate your position. Otherwise the brokerage firm must eat the customer’s loss. Brokerage firms don’t allow customers a free ride. If a brokerage firm doesn’t meet its overall margin requirements to the clearinghouse, that’s a default, a real no-no.
Cook: It’s hard for me to believe that JPMorgan is sitting flatfooted waiting for the axe to fall. Don’t you think they’ve dug up a lot of silver to help reduce this short position?
Butler: I’m sure they’ve come up with as much silver as possible, but there are physical constraints to that. Their problem is not a money problem, but a physical material problem.
Cook: I see they raised margin requirements on silver. Why only silver?
Butler: Silver had moved the most and the margins should have been raised. The scandal was when they raised the margins. This is an issue of timing. They waited until prices made a downside reversal and then raised silver margins.
Cook: Is this fishy?
Butler: This is an example of why I refer to the CME Group (COMEX) as operating a criminal enterprise, as I’ve seen them pull this dirty trick numerous times in the past. The exchange times the margin increase so that it comes when it is least likely to hurt, and maybe help, its big constituent member short holders. That time is always best when the price makes a sudden reversal down after a big climb. This way, the margin increase actually hurts the longs and benefits the shorts. The reversal to the downside swings the financial tide against the longs temporarily.
Cook: What should they have done?
Butler: What they should have done is raised margins on the way up, but that would have hurt the shorts, something the exchange would never do. By timing the margin increase just after a price reversal to the downside, the exchange helps the shorts.
Cook: Are they above the law?
Butler: What’s particularly infuriating and illegal is that the exchange is designated under commodity law as a self-regulatory organization (SRO). That means the CME Group is supposed to do things on a fair and even-handed basis, not cater to the selfish interests of its most important members. The phrase that comes to mind when describing how the CME fulfills its regulatory obligations is letting the fox guard the henhouse.
Cook: How in the world did this come about?
Butler: The CFTC and Congress made a very big mistake when they turned over so much regulation to the exchanges years ago. There is a conflict of interest in what the exchange does in its regulatory role. That’s why the COMEX is fighting the CFTC tooth and nail over position limits and every other issue that may infringe on its own interests.
Cook: The Commodity Future Trading Commission has ruled that within 3 months or so they will put limits on how much one entity can be long or short. Will this break up the concentrated short position?
Butler: If they stick to the timeline dictated by the new law and if they impose legitimate limits and throw out the phony exemptions to those limits.
Cook: Won’t that set silver “free at last?”
Butler: Yes, “thank God Almighty.”
Cook: Will the COMEX back down?
Butler: I don’t think so. They know this is the one issue that can blow the lid off silver.
Cook: Silver could turn into a runaway train. Why don’t these short sellers get out of the way and cover now?
Butler: They desperately want to, but it’s easier said than done because their position is so large that they are trapped. Just covering the limited amount of shorts to date has already had a profound impact on price. Why do you think we’ve risen so much in the past few months?
Cook: One of the commissioners at the CFTC has made a number of statements criticizing the shorts and the Commodity Exchange itself. Sounds like the senior regulators have embraced your views. Do you agree?
Butler: It’s hard to reach any other conclusion.
Cook: If that’s true then position limits are inevitable would you say?
Butler: The new law has mandated position limits, so unless the law is repealed I would say they are inevitable. But more than that, it’s important to remember that position limits are of specific relevance for silver more than any other market.
Cook: What do you mean?
Butler: COMEX silver is the only market which must have position limits radically reduced from the current accountability level. In all other commodities, including gold, the level of position limits is not so important because the short position is not that large. In silver, it’s the core issue.
Cook: What kind of position limit level do we need to see in silver?
Butler: If we don’t see a new level of close to 1500 contracts, instead of the current 6000 contract level, then this market is more crooked than I have been alleging. And I would think those in the public who follow this issue closely will be outraged and demand an explanation from the regulators. I know I will be.
Cook: Is it safe to say that silver is a buy until the short position is covered?
Butler: At least until the concentrated short position is reduced.
Cook: The volume on the SLV, the exchange traded fund, went ballistic recently. How many shares were trading before this jump and what did it go to?
Butler: There was an average daily volume of close to 15 million shares a day and it jumped to ten times that on a recent trading day.
Cook: How much of that was day trading?
Butler: Close to 99%, same as in every other market.
Cook: OK, but how much silver do you think was purchased on balance and must be delivered to the SLV?
Butler: I had been guessing close to 20 million ounces, but much to BlackRock’s credit (they’re the new sponsor), the silver is being brought in much more quickly than when Barclays was the sponsor.
Cook: Where is the silver coming from?
Butler: No one knows for sure, but the hallmarks on many of the new bars being deposited were from Russia and China. I think that’s good, because as those two countries wake up to the silver manipulation, they should be unlikely to continue supplying material at artificially depressed prices.
Cook: I heard a big delivery came in to the SLV last week. True?
Butler: Yes, there was an extraordinary deposit of 11.3 million ounces into the SLV on Wednesday, November 10, the largest one day deposit in the ETF since 2006. This brings the deposits into the Trust to over 18 million ounces in little more than a week and a half, to a new record of over 344 million ounces.
Cook: Are you underestimating the amount of silver available? Seems like there is always more silver.
Butler: While it is certainly possible that I have underestimated the amount of silver bullion in the world, that is not yet evident to date. I have always estimated about one billion ounces and we haven’t grown above that amount yet. What has happened is that more silver is being transferred from unreported inventories to reported inventories. This does create the illusion that the supply of silver is endless. It is not.
Cook: How much is left in unreported inventories that can come into the market?
Butler: Unless you have Superman’s x-ray vision and can see all the world’s vaults simultaneously, there is no way to know how much is left in unreported inventories. And I guarantee that you will make yourself crazy if you persist in trying to figure out the amount remaining.
Cook: Are you still sane?
Butler: No one comes with a butterfly net.
Cook: How much is known or in the reported category?
Butler: Since 2006, more than 550 million ounces have been transferred from unreported silver into reported world inventories, including the SLV and all other similar programs. Currently there are more than 716 million ounces in total world visible silver bullion inventories. That’s a very big chunk of my long-time estimate of one billion ounces in total world inventories. The way to look at it is that there are 550 million ounces less that can be transferred in the future. The long-term rise in price would seem to confirm my thinking.
Cook: Could the big shorts be buying the SLV to cover their short position?
Butler: Sure, but not to excessive amounts, as that would require lying to the SEC on ownership disclosure regulations. That’s not likely.
Cook: How much silver do you think JPMorgan and one other bank are short?
Butler: As of this moment, I’m guessing JPM may now be below 25,000 contracts. That’s 125 million ounces. But we won’t know for sure until more CFTC data are released.
Cook: How about the big eight shorts?
Butler: My guess is they are down to 56,000 contracts. That’s 280 million ounces.
Cook: How about all the shorts combined?
Butler: In COMEX futures total, I’d guess a bit under 500 million.
Cook: How does that compare with other commodities?
Butler: Still way off the charts when comparing paper contracts to real world production and inventories.
Cook: Do you see this leading to a price explosion in silver soon?
Butler: It’s one of several things that will lead to an explosion.
Cook: How does the silver short position compare to gold?
Butler: The silver short position is much bigger than gold in every measurement, especially compared to world inventories. Silver’s relative short position is more than 100 times larger than gold’s.
Cook: Do you think silver will outperform gold?
Butler: Yes. Silver has yet to leave gold in the dust, although it has fully matched or exceeded gold’s price performance. That is actually an advantage to those gold investors who have yet to make the switch into silver. It’s not too late.
Cook: Are you suggesting a switch now?
Butler: Yes. The facts suggest silver will outperform gold in the future, the logical investment action would be to convert gold into silver. Not because gold is likely to go down necessarily, but because silver is likely to offer better investment bang for the same buck.
Cook: Have people begun to switch?
Butler: There has been a noticeable shift to physical silver investment demand, perhaps from gold investors, although I still believe it’s in the early stages. Additionally, U.S. Mint sales of Silver Eagles are particularly strong relative to Gold Eagle sales, further confirming what may be a growing investor preference for silver over gold. Given how little silver exists compared to gold, if this trend continues, the influence on silver prices should be profound.
Cook: What’s the gold-silver ratio now?
Butler: The gold/silver ratio narrowed to almost 52. This is the best relative reading for silver since the summer of 2008, just before the price of silver was manipulated lower by JPMorgan and other commercial crooks on the COMEX.
Cook: You’ve got big cahunas calling JPMorgan a crook over and over again. Ever hear from their lawyers?
Butler: Not a peep and I send every article I write in which I mention JPMorgan to Jamie Dimon, CEO of JPMorgan and to the top regulatory officials at the CME, in addition to the CFTC.
Cook: I wonder why they haven’t sued you. If someone was calling my company crooked I think I would at least have my lawyer send them a letter.
Butler: Look, I’m not looking to get sued, but I don’t know of any other way to flush these weasels out. I know that JPM and the CME are operating as a criminal enterprise when it comes to silver.
Cook: What about the COMEX? You’ve been calling them sleazy for years. Have you ever received an answer to the numerous letters you’ve sent them?
Butler: Up until a few years ago, they would respond from time to time, but more recently they’ve been hiding behind the CFTC’s skirt and letting the Commission do their dirty work.
Cook: Yes, but now I see the COMEX has been in bitter disagreement with the CFTC on position limits. Why are they so opposed?
Butler: It may indicate that the CFTC, under Gary Gensler, is sick of the exchange using the CFTC. The reason the CME is so opposed to position limits is because of silver, not any other commodity. Don’t be fooled into thinking this isn’t a silver-specific issue.
Cook: Why only silver?
Butler: This is an important point. There is no position limit problem in any other commodity apart from silver. Not in oil, or grains or gold. Just silver. It’s the dirty secret that’s about to be revealed.
Cook: How much money have the banks made over the years with this big short position in silver?
Butler: Cumulatively, it could be billions of dollars.
Cook: This gravy train has suppressed the price, right?
Butler: Yes. The concentrated short position makes it impossible for the price not to have been suppressed.
Cook: If the market gets free of the concentrated short position it should revert to the true market price. Any idea what that is?
Butler: I’ll let the market tell us, but much higher than we’ve been in silver.
Cook: Do you think it will overshoot?
Butler: I think it’s impossible for it not to overshoot.
Cook: You think that Chairman Gensler at the CFTC is a straight shooter, right?
Butler: I think he walks on water. I may be dead wrong, but I’m a pretty good judge of human character.
Cook: Will he cure the silver mess?
Butler: If he follows the law and what he knows to be right.
Cook: Is he more competent than prior chiefs?
Butler: Gensler is the smartest guy in any room. It would be an insult to compare him to any former chairman or chairwoman.
Cook: Do you still claim the CFTC has looked the other way?
Butler: They have in the past, but I sense that is changing.
Cook: I think they hate your guts. Nobody’s been in their face with solid accusations like you have. Are they still hostile?
Butler: Hard to tell. I’m not concerned with past feelings. I don’t see why they would still be hostile; I offer constructive solutions where nobody else does. If they are hostile to anyone it should be towards those responsible for the manipulation, like JPMorgan and CME.
Cook: You’ve been the pioneer of virtually every new revelation about silver for over a decade. Just about everything that you predicted has come to pass. You’ve been a great conceptual thinker on silver and the premier whistleblower. Do you think the CFTC will ever acknowledge this and give you the award you deserve?
Butler: I sure hope so, but you’d have to ask them.
Cook: Everybody and his brother is writing about silver now. Some of it is amateurish and the good stuff originated with you. However, most of these articles never give credit to you. Do you agree that this is dishonorable?
Butler: Yes.
Cook: These organizations and individuals are trying to elbow themselves into position to take credit for your work. I’ve never seen anything like it, have you?
Butler: No.
Cook: What do you make of it?
Butler: Those that plagiarize are stealing my stuff and then lying by pretending they thought up my ideas. I’d avoid such people with a ten-foot pole.
Cook: They need to at least mention you if you are the source of their information. Right?
Butler: I think so.
Cook: Let’s change directions. What about COMEX silver inventories? What’s going on with them?
Butler: Recently, COMEX warehouse inventories dropped to near four year lows, at just under 108 million ounces. This drop, importantly, was accompanied with great turnover (in and out movements); highly suggestive of tightness and that the inventory is held in strong hands.
Cook: What’s the historical perspective on this?
Butler: COMEX silver inventories are down 60% from the 280 million ounce peak in the mid-1990’s. In contrast, COMEX gold inventories are at a record high of over 11.3 million ounces, the highest in the 45 year history of the COMEX. This is an apples to apples comparison, as the COMEX is the dominant market for both gold and silver trading.
Cook: Are we in a shortage?
Butler: I think we are in the early stages of a silver shortage that is bound to grow more severe.
Cook: Won’t this cause a surge in mining production?
Butler: Sure, eventually. But any mining increase in response to higher silver prices will take many years to hit the market. It’s not like flipping a light switch.
Cook: You’ve mentioned three things that will drive up the price of silver. It looks like one of them, investment demand, is kicking in. Will it get bigger than this?
Butler: I think that’s a certainty, as more people are waking up to the silver story.
Cook: Your second bullish factor is industrial demand. Do you still expect industrial users to panic because of a shortage?
Butler: Ever see what’s left in a supermarket after a hurricane warning?
Cook: Where does the price of silver burn itself out if a buying panic occurs?
Butler: Use your imagination. Then double it.
Cook: Your final and biggest bullish factor is the end of the concentrated short position. What will this do?
Butler: Terminating the concentrated short position will end the decades-old manipulation itself. That will bring about an honest and free market.
Cook: How will they cover the short position?
Butler: By buying back the position, delivering against it or by defaulting on it.
Cook: What about going forward? What will no big short sellers mean for the future?
Butler: It will be a different world price-wise.
Cook: According to the CFTC, the deadline for position limits is just over 2 months. Is silver a ticking time bomb until then?
Butler: Silver is a ticking time bomb for many reasons and the coming open debate on position limits is one of them.
Cook: The shorts are going to have to buy back futures aren’t they?
Butler: At some point, the shorts buying back is the post plausible outcome, as the only other choices are to deliver metal or default.
Cook: How many more shorts other than JPMorgan will have to cover?
Butler: My guess is somewhere around 15 to 20 thousand, a 75 to 100 million ounce equivalent.
Cook: Am I missing something or is this a lock?
Butler: If you mean much higher prices, then it looks like a lock to me.
Cook: This is so compelling I have to ask why it hasn’t been discounted in the silver price? How come it’s not $100 already?
Butler: I think it’s a combination of a lack of homework and the initial disbelief of the whole silver premise which prevents an objective investigation.
Cook: I remember when we first met ten years ago. You were telling me silver was the best thing on earth to own. Meanwhile, a well known investment service was sending out mailings suggesting people short silver at $4.00. They said silver was more plentiful than cockroaches. I wonder what happened to them?
Butler: I hope they covered their shorts quickly.
Cook: I bring this up because a lot of people have disagreed or argued with you along the way. They’ve all been proven wrong. However, to this day there are naysayers. What do you say to a guy like Jeffrey Christian at CPM who says there’s no way that JPMorgan is short that much silver?
Butler: Generally it’s good that disagreement exists so that market participants can hear both sides of the silver story.
Cook: What about Jon Nadler who says if Ted Butler was right the price would already have gone up?
Butler: The price has gone up and will continue to do so, in my opinion.
Cook: Why exactly has silver made this big recent move?
Butler: Primarily because of a lack of additional commercial short selling on the COMEX. It was the absence of additional commercial short selling, particularly by the big concentrated shorts, like JPMorgan, that allowed the price to climb as much as it did. On the rally it became obvious that the shorts were experiencing great financial stress, being forced to deposit many billions of dollars in margin calls. This should be taken as further proof of the manipulative role that the big shorts exerted on the price of silver.
Cook: Why did it get whacked?
Butler: The problem for the big shorts was that not only were they experiencing financial stress due to the rising price, they were unable to reduce their short position. That circumstance threatened to result in financial ruin if permitted to continue. Faced with financial ruin and the growing awareness by many of the predicament the big shorts were in, they resorted to their only alternative to that ruin – create a large and dramatic sell-off. That was what we began to see on Tuesday, with the CME’s unethically timed silver margin increase and the collusive vicious sell-off on Friday, under the cover of general commodity weakness.
Cook: What’s next?
Butler: No one knows for sure. It comes down to how much additional long liquidation the big shorts can engineer. We are still above all the critical moving averages, so there does exist the possibility we could go lower to get the technical funds completely flushed out. For sure, if we do go lower, it will be because JPMorgan and the other COMEX crooks are successful in tricking the technical funds into forced selling and not for any other reason. But there has been significant liquidation already, so it is just as possible it could be done or nearly so. Certainly there is nothing in the real world of silver that would account for further selling.
Cook: What’s the status of the formal investigation of silver by the CFTC, Enforcement Division?
Butler: It has yet to be concluded. A new director was just named which should help resolve the investigation that was initiated because of my revelations in 2008 and which Commissioner Bart Chilton publicly referenced recently. No one is more anxious than me to see what the investigation concludes.
Cook: You’ve made a big thing about pool accounts at brokerage firms, international banks and private mints. What can go wrong?
Butler: Everything. It is not hard to imagine investors ending up with a total loss because the metal may not exist to back these programs. If someone is claiming to store 1000-ounce bars for you and you don’t have the serial numbers for the exact bars you paid for, you should run, not walk, to a storage program that allows you to get the specific bars. I’d be especially wary of metal purported to be stored out of the country.
Cook: Are you recommending people switch from gold to silver?
Butler: Most definitely. That still appears to be a switch, which will be greatly rewarding. It amazes me how so many commentaries predict that silver will outperform gold, yet won’t come out and say that you should sell gold in order to buy silver. It makes no sense not to sell gold in order to buy silver if you are convinced silver will outperform gold. I think many feel it’s heresy to sell gold for any reason. But if your goal is to get the best return on your investment dollar in the future, which it should be, switch to silver from gold.
Cook: The bottom line is that people who followed your advice have made a lot of money. What advice would you give to our clients now?
Butler: Well, the days of 4 or 5, 7 to 12 dollar silver are over and that’s too bad for new buyers. At least we spared no effort in urging folks to buy all along. I think in the future we will look back at current prices with much the same result, namely, large profits for those who bought. Although the price is much higher now than it was then and conditions have changed, in many ways today’s new conditions are better.

Interview With Theodore Butler - SilverSeek.com

See also this:

"Increases to the silver margin requirement in futures contracts should be viewed as the final act of desperation. It is a device to control price within the paper silver arena. However, in a grand backfire, a higher margin produces a lower price for the physical buyers, who eagerly step up to place and fill orders. The margin maintenance hike on November 9th was six times greater for silver than for gold. The Big Four US banks are caught in an historically unprecedented short squeeze, bleeding $billions. Tuesday November 9th saw a powerful gold & silver price downdraft. The COMEX raised the silver margin requirement in a bland attempt to slow a raging bull market amidst a broken global monetary system. One week later they raised the margin again for both monetary metals. The price downdraft continued. But some calmer winds in Europe enabled precious metals prices to recover. Silver has snapped back much more than gold.

The Chicago Mercantile Exchange raised the margin requirements for silver on November 9th. It was highly motivated. They wanted to prevent a blowout upside move in silver past $30 before Christmas, and to relieve some of the pain to the Big Four US banks. Unlike gold & silver, no margin hikes were doled out for soybeans, corn, sugar, or cotton despite their concurrent price gains. The message is clear, that desperation has set in relative to precious metals, as conditions are breaking down badly. The CME sent out a memo raising the margin maintenance requirements for silver futures by up to 29%, from $5000 to $6500 per contract. Initial positions have a slightly higher margin. It is their right, being the market maker. Let not their fast disappearing silver inventory deter their path. Less than two weeks later, the CME raised the silver margin maintenance requirement another 11.5% to $7250 in a sign of desperation. They also raised the gold margin, but only by 6% from $4251 to $4500 in a symbolic gesture. The CME motive is less about risk mitigation concerns and more driven by the desire to restrain the bull market movement. The investment world will regroup long before Christmas, like in the next week or two. Just when the European woes focused on Ireland, and a rescue aid package seemed in the offing, the silver price jumped upward by $2.00 on a single day, November 18th, a strong telegraph across the paper-physical silver table. The Powerz cannot halt the silver juggernaut, which will see $30/oz by January. If a double hike in the silver margin is the best they have, then they are truly whistling in the grave yard."

http://www.financialsense.com/contributo...

EVERYBODY BUY ONE OUNCE OF SILVER: JP Morgan against the world, JP Morgan against the little guy. It's war: fight back!... Oh, and about Goldman-Sachs, below. Truly our favorite bankers ( and the Vatican's).

http://www.zerohedge.com/article/crash-jp-morgan-buy-silver-show-too-big-fails-who-boss

This is making the rounds of the financial world. It's Mike Krieger and Max Kaiser's idea, Alex Jones less than enthusiastic - makes you wonder why. I am all for it. 

More info here:

( see comment below)

http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=191915.0

.....  in this context:

http://kingworldnews.com/kingworldnews/KWN_DailyWeb/Entries/2010/11/12_James_Turk_-_Kamikaze_Attacks_in_the_Silver_Market.html

.... and that context:

http://kingworldnews.com/kingworldnews/KWN_DailyWeb/Entries/2010/11/10_KWN_Source_-_Asian_Buyers_Have_Silver_Shorts_Checkmated.html

Move Your Money Part 2: Buy Silver to Help Stop Market Manipulation and Show Too Big To Fail Banks Like JP Morgan Who Is Boss

→ Washington’s Blog
Leading economists and financial experts say that our economy cannot recover until the too big to fails are broken up. See this and this. The giant banks have been sucking money out of the real economy and making us all poorer. But the government is refusing to even rein in the mega-banks, let alone break them up.
One of the too big to fails - JP Morgan - manipulates the silver market. See this, this, this and this.
Mike Krieger and Max Keiser have an idea for attacking the weak underbelly of the seemingly invincible too big to fail banks and market manipulators ... all at the same time.
Specifically, they say that if everyone buys just 1 ounce of silver, it will force JP Morgan - a giant manipulator of the silver market - to cover its short positions, and drive it out of business.
Watch these short videos for an explanation:

You can buy silver coins here among others, if in the US.

In Israel, no idea where; other countries, check locally.

http://www.apmex.com/Product/27024/1_oz_APMEX_999_Fine_Silver_RoundsNov_30th_.aspx

Update:

 Here is another great idea, which I implemented immediately. May I suggest you do the same?

From a Yahoo Finance board:

 "CFTC BOMBSHELL

I sent this email on Saturday, Nov 13, 2010. As you can see, I received a response to this email from CFTC Commissioner Bart Chilton hours later. Please read the email below:
-----
From: OMITTED
To: Gensler, Gary; Chilton, Bart
Sent: Sat Nov 13 16:46:32 2010
Subject: Market Manipulation

Dear Sirs,
It is quite obvious that the CME Group, JP Morgan, and the other big concentrated silver shorts rigged another collusive sell off of HUGE proportions last week.

It had nothing to do with silver supply/demand fundamentals. It had everything to do with the crooked banks such as JP Morgan trying to get out of their disastrous short positions due to billion-dollar margin calls in the past few weeks.

Please establish transparency, integrity, and order back to the silver market. We need position limits enacted as per Senator Dodd's bill.

Please enact a 1,500 contract position limit on silver and do away with the naked shorting which is criminal and manipulative for a free marketplace.

Sincerely
-----
From: Chilton, Bart
Date: Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 2:40 PM
Subject: Re: Market Manipulatiom
To: "OMITTED"

Thx. I agree we need the limits.
-----
This is proof that the CFTC regulators are getting our emails and hearing our voices for position limits in the silver market.

When the proper positions limits are in place, the silver manipulation will end and silver will revert back to a free market price, which is much higher from here.

Everyone reading this message needs to take 5 minutes of their time now and email these two CFTC heads regarding implementing position limits of 1,500 contracts per entity as per Ted Butler’s recommendations. You can reach CFTC Chairman Gensler and Commissioner Chilton at these addresses: Ggensler@cftc.gov and Bchilton@cftc.gov

We need to flood the CFTC email inboxes with thousands of emails by Monday morning.

The next CFTC meeting regarding silver position limits and other important issues is on Nov 29th.

According to silver analyst Ted Butler, the rigged sell off last week was a collusive effort between the CME group and the big shorts, which allow the big shorts to continue covering their concentrated short positions. This only strengthens the future for silver and all silver mining companies."

UPDATE:

IT WORKED!

http://www.zerohedge.com/article/silver-shortages-accelerate-wholesale-supplies-plunge-kriegerkesier-1-jp-morgan-0?

Smart and brave! I learn every day. MELT-UP is literally prophetic; and watch their upcoming documentary, END OF LIBERTY. Preview below.

October 28, 2010 Silver Short Position Could Cost JP Morgan Billions in Losses It was just announced late Wednesday that two lawsuits have been filed in Manhattan federal court against JP Morgan and HSBC Holdings Inc. accusing them of manipulating the price of silver by "amassing enormous short positions". The suits were filed by Brian Beatty and Peter Laskaris, who each claim they lost money trading COMEX silver futures and options contracts as a result of JP Morgan's alleged manipulation. In NIA's latest documentary 'Meltup' that was released on May 13th, 2010, and has now been viewed by over 855,000 people, NIA's President Gerard Adams exposed the manipulation of silver that has been taking place by JP Morgan. Mr. Adams discussed in detail in 'Meltup' how on March 14th, 2008, the very day Bear Stearns failed was the same day silver reached a multidecade high of about $21 per ounce. According to Mr. Adams, Bear Stearns was on the verge of being forced to cover their naked short position in silver, which could have quickly sent silver as high as $50 per ounce. This would have caused a loss of confidence in the U.S. dollar and a possible currency crisis. Instead of allowing this to happen, the Federal Reserve orchestrated a bailout of Bear Stearns and JP Morgan acquired their assets with the backing of the Fed. Shortly after taking over Bear Stearn's silver short position, JP Morgan was able to manipulate the price of silver down to below $9 per ounce. NIA exposed in 'Meltup' that JP Morgan was short 30,000 silver contracts representing 150 million ounces of silver. This is one of the largest concentrated short positions in the history of all commodities, representing 31% of all open COMEX silver contracts. NIA found it shocking for this type of a concentrated naked short position to exist in the very metal that the U.S. constitution defined as real money. What NIA found especially frightening is how almost everybody in the mainstream media has ignored and continues to ignore this issue. Not one article in any major financial publication has even questioned why JP Morgan is allowed to hold such a large short position in our nation's single most important commodity. On February 5th of 2010, when the price of silver was manipulated by JP Morgan down to below $15 per ounce, NIA said, "this is a once in a lifetime entry point for those wishing to go long silver at a bargain basement price". On that day, NIA's President Mr. Adams purchased 1,300 January 2011 $20 call options in the silver ETF at $0.89 per contract and on February 8th, NIA announced his purchase and said to NIA members, "NIA is betting big that this past week's short-term decline in the paper price of silver was just a temporary wash out, before a huge surge in silver prices later in 2010." On July 28th with the price of silver at $17.63 per ounce, NIA released an article entitled "Gold and Silver Capitulation is Near" in which it said, "The sentiment on gold and silver has abruptly changed to the negative like nothing we have ever seen before and to us this means the big move to the upside is right around the corner." Since NIA's July 28th article predicting silver's big move to the upside was right around the corner, silver has rallied as much as 41% to a high on October 14th of $24.92 per ounce. On October 14th, the very day silver reached its high, Mr. Adams sold his silver ETF call options at $4.25 per contract making a gross profit of $436,800. Silver, at its current price of $23.69 per ounce, is trading for only 1.78% the price of gold. We have a gold/silver ratio of 56, despite the fact that only ten times more silver has been produced in world history than gold. On December 11th, 2009, NIA declared silver the best investment for the next decade. On December 21st, 2009, in NIA's top 10 predictions for 2010, NIA predicted a sharp decline in the gold/silver ratio, which was 64 at the time. NIA was right, the gold/silver ratio has declined by 12.5% so far this year. Silver possesses all of the same monetary qualities as gold, but silver is also used for countless industrial applications. 95% of all silver produced in world history has been consumed. World silver inventories have declined from 10 billion ounces in 1940 down to only 1 billion ounces today. Meanwhile, almost all of the gold mined in world history remains in the form of bullion bars stored in vaults. The world has approximately 2 billion ounces of gold inventories today. The total value of the world's gold inventories is currently $2.656 trillion compared to the total value of the world's silver inventories of $23.68 billion. This means the value of the world's gold inventories today is worth an unbelievable 112 times more than its silver inventories. China has been rapidly diversifying their foreign exchange reserves into gold in an attempt to position the yuan to be the world's next reserve currency. Despite China increasing its gold reserves by 76% in recent years to 1,054 metric tons, the value of China's gold reserves still only account for about 1.5% of its total foreign exchange reserves compared to the average nation of 10%. China needs to rapidly increase its gold reserves this decade, which NIA believes will send gold not just to new nominal highs, but also to new all time highs adjusted to the CPI and the real rate of inflation. No central banks in the world currently own silver. Imagine if just one central bank of any major country announces a large silver purchase. The world is only producing 709.6 million ounces of silver per year worth a measly $16.8 billion. Total annual silver demand for industrial applications alone is 352.2 million ounces. Once you include photography, jewelry, silverware, and coins & medals, total annual silver demand is already 729.8 million ounces, which is greater than silver production. If a central bank decides to purchase silver, the market is so tight that silver prices could literally rise to $50 per ounce overnight. NIA estimates that $50 per ounce silver would mean approximately $4 billion in losses to JP Morgan. NIA applauds CFTC Commissioner Bart Chilton for taking the time to publicly comment on Tuesday about the precious metals markets and in particular the silver markets and acknowledging that the public deserves some answers to their concerns that silver markets are being, and have been, manipulated. Mr. Chilton said in a statement, "I believe that there have been repeated attempts to influence prices in the silver markets. There have been fraudulent efforts to persuade and deviously control that price. Based on what I have been told by members of the public, and reviewed in publicly available documents, I believe violations to the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) have taken place in silver markets and that any such violation of the law in this regard should be prosecuted." On September 9th, after JP Morgan announced that they would be winding down their proprietary trading operations and laying off their 20 proprietary commodities traders, who NIA believes could be responsible for the current manipulation in silver, NIA released an article entitled, "Is JP Morgan's Silver Manipulation Over?". NIA said in this article that it was "hopeful but skeptical that the manipulation is coming to an end" and "We remain cautiously optimistic at this time." Since this article, it appears as though silver has been trading based on free market forces for the first time in many years. There have been no noticeable attempts to drive down the price of silver through manipulation. NIA's most recent silver stock suggestion from September 20th gained 111% in just 17 trading days and its previous silver stock suggestion from July 28th gained 111% in 47 trading days. We are very happy that investors who have for years been suffering due to JP Morgan's manipulation, are now finally seeing the value of their silver investments rise to where the free market wants them to be. The efforts of all NIA members to expose JP Morgan's illegal activities are now paying off big for all Americans. NIA members should be proud of themselves, but the fight is not over yet. Although most NIA members have been prospering and are now positioned to not only survive but thrive during U.S. hyperinflation, we still need to work together to prevent a complete societal collapse so that our country is still worth living in after the U.S. dollar becomes worthless. We hope to release our new documentary 'End of Liberty' this Sunday on Halloween. After you watch 'End of Liberty', it is important for you to not only spread the word to your family members and friends, but we strongly urge you to contact all relevant web sites, blogs, newspapers, magazines, and television and radio shows, telling them about the movie. 'End of Liberty' is quite simply the most important firm ever produced in world history.... Here! http://israeltruthtimes.blogspot.com/2010/10/so-here-it-is-end-of-liberty.html