CHEMTRAILS AND VACCINES, PART VII: The cure before the disease? This brilliant video addresses many crucial issues discussed in this blog. To review carefully.

"There is an important principle in Judaism, a source of hope and also one of the structuring principles of the Torah. It is the principle that God creates the cure before the disease. Bad things may happen but God has already given us the remedy if we know where to look for it."

http://www.aish.com/tp/i/sacks/292001731.html





UPDATE 1/13/2019 : see this short video too:





https://youtu.be/CmAsTrsUjBc

This is a MUST SEE video about vaccines: you will never look at them the same again after this; you have kids or grandkids? I beg you, watch it!

This was an Alex Jones very important video, but unfortunately YouTube - i.e. Google - terminated all videos from Alex Jones. I will see if I can find it on another channel, somewhere. I am very sorry it is gone, I would have liked to watch it again myself.

Really sorry about all this censure, which I can't do a thing about.

Kol Tuv

DS

With all the hype about the "flu shot" in the US, it is a good time to remember what vaccines are all about....

... I have not investigated this year's flu vaccine - this year's influenza virus is H3N2 -, but judging by the fraud, corruption and false science sold to the public in 2009 under the guise of "public health", and considering that the flu "epidemic" is abating, I would suggest you think twice before falling for the media-fueled propaganda.

If I have time I will do a thorough research again, but frankly I doubt it.

Meanwhile, do a search on this blog, which is chock full of information about vaccines in general, and the H1N1 vaccine in particular, research done three years ago, on which I spent literally months of hard labor. Look for the labels: "vaccinations"," H1N1", "swine flu bird flu", "contamination of vaccines", "Gardasil", etc.

 And of course be very, very careful with all other immunizations, in particular for your children and grandchildren. What this lady is saying is true, there is an explosion of disability and neurologic disorders in the youngest generation ( not only in the youngest generation unfortunately, also in mature and older adults!), and my research three years ago predicted these outcomes; read, you will see for yourself.

And by the way, I am very proud of the fact that in Israel, only 3% of the public took the H1N1 vaccine - I found that figure in a global  table, while the government of Israel states that they administered 700,000 units, which would make it less than 10% - not sure which one is correct; still they are both better than a lot of countries. I do take credit for that accomplishment: the controversy I generated with my letter to the Ministry of Health started the debate over that useless, harmful and wasteful vaccine. Let's hope that Israel learned from their mistakes three years ago, and will not fall for UN backed propaganda this year. Today Israel is blaming Bibi for the increasing deficit; remember that 450 million shekels of that deficit were thrown down the toilet with the purchase of the H1N1 vaccine in 2009, most of which had to be discarded.





... And speaking of the devil....





UPDATE AND RESEARCH INFORMATION HERE:
 http://israeltruthtimes.blogspot.co.il/2013/01/how-not-to-waste-money-2009-h1n1.html

DS

STAY AWAY FROM THESE POISONS! Since now is '"flu shot" season, it's as good a time as ever to remind you of these truths; you do want kids and grand kids, don't you!? ...Plus some musings on the medical situation in Israel.

The article mentioned in the video you just saw, below, is in favor of influenza vaccination, and in favor of producing even more vaccines; however the lack of substantiation of the overall effectiveness of the standard influenza vaccine is quite remarkable, even if not quite as extreme as either Dr. Tenpenny or Alex Jones claim. On the other hand the evidence re: Guillain-Barre is well known and corroborated.


I would like to clarify that I am not opposed to vaccines in general, and have used them myself, as well as in my practice. But unfortunately, because of the misuse and abuse of that medical modality, and because of the lack of integrity of some, if not all, of the companies involved, the vaccine manufacturers have lost my trust. If I knew that a company is absolutely honest and works for the public good,  I would be the first one to try its products, provided independent research showed true effectiveness. But for such a situation to occur, the whole system has to be changed. It cannot be that the main financial beneficiaries of the vaccination campaigns are the very companies setting the rules as to who should get the vaccines; neither can it be that all research is done "in-house", either by scientists employed in one form or another by the financial beneficiaries themselves, or paid by NGO's or government bodies while those bodies themselves have an incestuous relationship with the said companies. These are unacceptable conflicts of interest, and nothing good can come out of such a set-up. So I would say: 


 TIME FOR A CHANGE!

Researchers Believe Influenza Vaccines Need Improvement

Larry Hand

October 25, 2011 — Critical gaps exist in the evidence for the effectiveness of licensed influenza vaccines in the United States, researchers report in an article published online October 25 in The Lancet Infectious Diseases. Individuals who are at risk for medical complications or people who are aged 65 years or older are especially affected by the gaps, the researchers write.

The researchers conducted a meta-analysis of 31 studies that used laboratory tests to confirm influenza infections. These studies were selected from 5707 studies identified, published over a period of 40 years. The authors found that trivalent inactivated vaccine, which is used for 90% of influenza vaccinations in the United States, is only effective in preventing infection in 59% of healthy adults. They also found live attenuated influenza vaccine, which is not approved for adults who are aged 50 years or older, to be effective in 83% of children aged 7 years or younger, and in 69% of people younger than 65 years.

"The ongoing health burden caused by seasonal influenza and the potential global effect of a severe pandemic suggests an urgent need for a new generation of more highly effective and cross-protective vaccines that can be manufactured rapidly," write Michael Osterholm, PhD, MPH, from the University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, and lead author of the study, and colleagues. "In the meantime, we should maintain public support for present vaccines that are the best intervention available for seasonal influenza."

The researchers found no published papers on randomized controlled trials of trivalent inactivated vaccine efficacy in people aged 2 to 17 years or in adults aged 65 years and older. They also found no such trials for live attenuated influenza vaccine efficacy in people aged 8 to 59 years. In addition, they found "substantial variability" by season and age group.

Earlier research has shown vaccines to be from 70% to 90% effective in healthy adults if matched to the circulating strains. "The difference between 69% effectiveness and 90% effectiveness (or greater) will have a major public health effect in any pandemic that causes serious morbidity or increased mortality," the researchers write.

They recommend that industry and government form partnerships to accelerate research and reduce regulatory barriers to bring new vaccines already in development to market.

Lancet Infect Dis. Published online October 25, 2011.

P.S. I am amazed that some people in Israel still refer back to an obscure blog, written in poor English and full of fallacies, (such as my blaming China for the crisis)- obviously its author doesn't have good command of the English language :


http://mddaisyjsternliesaboutfluvaccine.blogspot.com/


That blog was written in 2009 to try to discredit me and my claims about the H1N1 vaccine, and my claims about Rome controlling the show. I have no idea who is behind the blog, and frankly didn't bother to find out, as I had more important things to deal with at the time. I never addressed the lies presented in that blog, which by the way were based on the following TV show in Hebrew on Israel TV:


http://lnk.nana10.co.il/Article/?ArticleId=677195&sid=182


I never addressed the libel claiming that I am an unlicensed doctor, even though I had - and have - full legal rights to do so. Actually I still do have, and did at the time have, a full and legitimate NY State medical license. The fact that I had not renewed my medical license in Israel in 2008 for personal reasons does not negate the fact that I was fully licensed in Israel from 2001 ( or was it 2002?) to 2008, after having  made aliyah from the US, and worked at Kupat Cholim Meuchedet for about 10 months. I left after writing a letter of resignation, no different from the hundreds of letters of resignation written by residents all over Israel; THEY know the truth about the inner workings of the medical system in Israel. Maybe I saw the writing on the wall a few years before they did! But now they are stuck, while I am free. Never was there any action taken against me as a physician in the 25 years I worked as a doctor; I had a private practice for many years in NY State, was loved by my patients, worked for many years in other situations as well prior to that, including two years of emergency room work . My CV is there for the asking for any legitimate person requesting it. Notice the hesitation of the TV anchor when she mentions my licensing status: she knows full well that she is standing on shaky grounds, as shaky as her voice!


This chapter is not over yet, folks. There are attorneys in Israel, all it takes is getting their help. This lie has been posted on the internet for two years now, it's been going on long enough. Maybe it is time for me to take action now. 11/11/11 seems like a perfect date to do so. After all, THEY started on 11/11/09. Time for the tables to be turned!


Just this past week, we have seen the heavy hand of Rome in the financial GLOBAL NEW WORLD ORDER. See this post:


They are not even hiding anymore. Didn't I warn yo...


Well, parallel to the action on the financial scene, - which was brought out into the open by Benedikt's encyclical, Caritas in Veritate, presented to the world July 7, 2009, and renewed just last week, see link above,  - , an action was going on at the WHO. That was initiated by the pandemic declaration in Geneva one month earlier, which set the stage for worldwide H1N1 vaccinations, as well as martial law in all nations members of the UN, that is, all nations except for Taiwan, Kosovo, and THE VATICAN at the time. Facts on the ground have borne this out, as you have repeatedly seen all over the news this past year. From Oakland to Athens - and  to Yesha, Israel -, you have seen those same hooded goons pouncing on the local population who only want freedom and human rights. Where is democracy? Where is freedom? Vanishing in front of our very eyes. Replaced by a totalitarian global regime.


 (How come the goons all look alike, I ask you? Don't you think they all went to the same school?)


 And of course, facts on the ground regarding the H1N1 vaccine fraud have been exposed by none other than the BBC, following the important lawsuit against the French Ministry of Health in 2010, which quickly stopped the H1N1 vaccine propaganda in its tracks, just as the "pandemic" was petering out on its own, even milder than a regular yearly flu season. So here too I was vindicated.


Not to be outdone, the Israeli Ministry of Health, which wasted US $100 million on that useless vaccine, quickly found a way to suppress national outrage over that huge waste by creating an artificial crisis at Barzilai Hospital in Ashkelon. Remember all the media coverage about Chassidim protesting over the graves? What convenient timing! The public, which has a very short memory, forgot right away about the H1N1 panic, the propaganda, the slanted reports, and of course, the enormous financial drain.


I think that the Ministry of Health in Israel are getting exactly what they deserve these days. Doctors, residents, even nurses, are all rebelling against the conditions in which they have been forced to work. In which country, please tell me,  are doctors FORCED to go to work? Since when is the honorable medical profession treated like an army of servants, or rather, an army of slaves? Don't you think that the 400 million NIS that went down the toilet in the pathetic H1N1 vaccine purchase could have been better used to pay decent and appropriate salaries to doctors, and thereby attract good quality, content staff ? ( Actually, 450 million NIS; just 10% of that was used for actual vaccinations, which themselves were a waste and a danger; the rest was thrown down the tube). Now look at the situation Israel finds itself in: terror victims are arriving to hospitals; but where will the medical staff be? Are you going to force doctors to come take care of the wounded?


 Shame on you, Ministry of Health of Israel: Israel is now getting paid back in full for your deep errors in judgment - or worse.

... And what about Gardasil? Another major scandal. MERCK involved - any surprise there? See their dismal, terrible record with regard to vaccines - how come they are still in business??

Gardasil Researcher Drops A Bombshell

Harper: Controversal Drug Will Do Little To Reduce Cervical Cancer Rates

By Susan Brinkmann, For The Bulletin

Sunday, October 25, 2009

Dr. Diane Harper, lead researcher in the development of two human papilloma virus vaccines, Gardasil and Cervarix, said the controversial drugs will do little to reduce cervical cancer rates and, even though they're being recommended for girls as young as nine, there have been no efficacy trials in children under the age of 15.

Dr. Harper, director of the Gynecologic Cancer Prevention Research Group at the University of Missouri, made these remarks during an address at the 4th International Public Conference on Vaccination which took place in Reston, Virginia on Oct. 2-4. Although her talk was intended to promote the vaccine, participants said they came away convinced the vaccine should not be received.

"I came away from the talk with the perception that the risk of adverse side effects is so much greater than the risk of cervical cancer, I couldn't help but question why we need the vaccine at all," said Joan Robinson, Assistant Editor at the Population Research Institute.

Dr. Harper began her remarks by explaining that 70 percent of all HPV infections resolve themselves without treatment within a year. Within two years, the number climbs to 90 percent. Of the remaining 10 percent of HPV infections, only half will develop into cervical cancer, which leaves little need for the vaccine.

She went on to surprise the audience by stating that the incidence of cervical cancer in the U.S. is already so low that "even if we get the vaccine and continue PAP screening, we will not lower the rate of cervical cancer in the US."

There will be no decrease in cervical cancer until at least 70 percent of the population is vaccinated, and even then, the decrease will be minimal.

Apparently, conventional treatment and preventative measures are already cutting the cervical cancer rate by four percent a year. At this rate, in 60 years, there will be a 91.4 percent decline just with current treatment. Even if 70 percent of women get the shot and required boosters over the same time period, which is highly unlikely, Harper says Gardasil still could not claim to do as much as traditional care is already doing.

Dr. Harper, who also serves as a consultant to the World Health Organization, further undercut the case for mass vaccination by saying that "four out of five women with cervical cancer are in developing countries."

Ms. Robinson said she could not help but wonder, "If this is the case, then why vaccinate at all? But from the murmurs of the doctors in the audience, it was apparent that the same thought was occurring to them."

However, at this point, Dr. Harper dropped an even bigger bombshell on the audience when she announced that, "There have been no efficacy trials in girls under 15 years."

Merck, the manufacturer of Gardasil, studied only a small group of girls under 16 who had been vaccinated, but did not follow them long enough to conclude sufficient presence of effective HPV antibodies.

This is not the first time Dr. Harper revealed the fact that Merck never tested Gardasil for safety in young girls. During a 2007 interview with KPC News.com, she said giving the vaccine to girls as young as 11 years-old "is a great big public health experiment."

At the time, which was at the height of Merck's controversial drive to have the vaccine mandated in schools, Dr. Harper remained steadfastly opposed to the idea and said she had been trying for months to convince major television and print media about her concerns, "but no one will print it."

"It is silly to mandate vaccination of 11 to 12 year old girls," she said at the time. "There also is not enough evidence gathered on side effects to know that safety is not an issue."

When asked why she was speaking out, she said: "I want to be able to sleep with myself when I go to bed at night."



Since the drug's introduction in 2006, the public has been learning many of these facts the hard way. To date, 15,037 girls have officially reported adverse side effects from Gardasil to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). These adverse reactions include Guilliane Barre, lupus, seizures, paralysis, blood clots, brain inflammation and many others. The CDC acknowledges that there have been 44 reported deaths.

Dr. Harper also participated in the research on Glaxo-Smith-Kline's version of the drug, Cervarix, currently in use in the UK but not yet approved here. Since the government began administering the vaccine to school-aged girls last year, more than 2,000 patients reported some kind of adverse reaction including nausea, dizziness, blurred vision, convulsions, seizures and hyperventilation. Several reported multiple reactions, with 4,602 suspected side-effects recorded in total. The most tragic case involved a 14 year-old girl who dropped dead in the corridor of her school an hour after receiving the vaccination.

The outspoken researcher also weighed in last month on a report published in the Journal of the American Medical Association that raised questions about the safety of the vaccine, saying bluntly: "The rate of serious adverse events is greater than the incidence rate of cervical cancer."

Ms. Robinson said she respects Dr. Harper's candor. "I think she's a scientist, a researcher, and she's genuine enough a scientist to be open about the risks. I respect that in her."

However, she failed to make the case for Gardasil. "For me, it was hard to resist the conclusion that Gardasil does almost nothing for the health of American women."

 

Could the Gardasil vaccine actually help increase cervical cancer rates?

“The side effects that have been reported are real and they cannot be brushed aside.”
That quote, from Diane Harper, M.D., might mark a turning point in the way the medical mainstream perceives Gardasil, the controversial vaccine for human papillomavirus (HPV). Dr. Harper is part of that mainstream. In fact, she was one of the principal investigators in the initial Gardasil trials. But she hasn’t been timid about recognizing Gardasil’s dangers.
More than a year ago, HSI writer and researcher Michele Cagan interviewed Dr. Harper, who revealed a surprising fear about the way Gardasil might influence women’s health habits. This is an excerpt from that interview.
“Even though Dr. Harper believes in the vaccine, she does not think it should be mandated for young girls. She also told me about several concerns she has surrounding public perception of the vaccine, including this stunner: Dr. Harper is afraid that the way the vaccine is being presented could actually have the effect of increasing the rate of cervical cancer in the U.S.
“Why is Dr. Harper afraid of this outcome? ‘Because of the way the vaccine is being advertised and portrayed in the media. The vaccine is not a silver bullet. It can’t clear up an existing HPV infection, and it can’t cure cervical cancer. But the advertising doesn’t make that very clear.’ If women think the vaccine offers 100% protection – or, even worse, can cure the virus or the cancer – they may skip their annual Pap tests, and that could very well lead to an increase in cervical cancer rates.
“Another gray area is the duration. It appears to remain effective for at least five years, but we have no idea how long it will last in the real world. And that could mean that girls vaccinated at 11 or 12 actually lose protection when they’ll need it most – but it’s impossible to know that until after large numbers of vaccinated girls contract the virus.
“Here’s another little tidbit the advertising fails to mention – but it’s a critical point. If a girl already has an HPV infection, the vaccine won’t work. I asked Dr. Harper if that was only true for the strain in question, but it’s not. ‘If someone has HPV 18, for example, the vaccine won’t provide any protection for that strain, or full protection for any of the other strains.’ And since millions of women have HPV, millions of women could be getting vaccinated for nothing. Except side effects, that is”
For more on Dr. Harper’s misgivings about Gardasil, see the e-Alert “Hide Your Daughters” (8/21/08).