Playing with semantics just won't cut it! Senile Peres himself admits: Bibi is behind it all. So.....

http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/168363#.UaOMEdj-vKc

 If Bibi denies Jews our G-d given right of self-defense, Bibi is a murderer; and as a murderer, he should be dealt with as with a murderer; no extenuating circumstances allowed! We should not and will not tolerate any further such criminal activity on his part. He has no right to deliberately endanger our lives for his own political - or other - survival. We know who is behind him, who is breathing down his neck, but that is no excuse. Who knows what kind of political deals he has made with Hillary, with Obama, with Putin, etc. Remember Kastner, how Kastner sacrificed hundreds of thousands of Hungarian Jews in order to save less than two thousand, among others his own relatives and friends. That is not permitted: Bibi is NOT allowed to sacrifice Yesha Jews in order to save who knows whom. One of three situations in which you have to sacrifice your own life according to Torah, is if you are being asked to kill a fellow Jew. You have to be willing to die rather than kill another Jew. This, Bibi is not willing to do. Therefore he is a murderer until proven otherwise. Let honest and non-corrupt rabbis decide what should be his fate. 

Please send this to the Knesset. Thank you, DS 

Police: Accident Not Caused by Rocks

Mother and two children trapped and injured when car overturns in Samaria. Eyewitnesses said there were rocks on the road.

By Gil Ronen

First Publish: 5/27/2013, 10:21 AM

Illustration

Israel news photo: Flash 90

A mother and her two children were injured when their car overturned near Migdalim, in Samaria, Monday morning.

The Judea and Samaria Police said that the mother and her 12-year-old daughter were trapped in the car. A baby boy was extricated from the car.

One of the children was in serious condition, according to initial reports. The mother and another child suffered light to moderate wounds.

Police discredited initial reports that the car may have overturned after Arabs hurled rocks at it. Several drivers who passed the location of the accident said that there were rocks on the road.

Police said that trackers deployed to the scene of the accident found no evidence that rocks had been thrown at the car.

Adelle Biton, 3, who was seriously injured when a rock was thrown at her mother's car in Samaria, was transferred to Beit Levinstein Hospital for rehabilitation Sunday. She was in critical condition for 2.5 months, but her life is no longer in danger. She is, however, only partially conscious.

Police: No Rocks in Samarian Auto Accident

The Samaria (Shomron) and Judea police issued a statement, Monday morning, that its personnel could not find evidence to support claims by eyewitnesses that the throwing of rocks by Arabs was to blame for the overturning of a car near the Samarian Jewish community of Migdalim. A woman and her two children were injured in the accident.
The accident occured slightly less than two months after a Hevron man was convicted of murder in the 2011 traffic death of Asher and Yonatan Palmer of Kiryat Arba'. Authorities initially determined human error in the crash but it was later determined that the car went out of control as a result of a stone that went through the windshield and struck Asher Palmer in the face.

Stoning Victim Adelle Biton Released to Rehabilitation

Three-year-old Adelle Biton of the Samarian (Shomron) Jewish community of Yakir, who was critically wounded in a rock attack, two-and-a-half months ago near the western Samarian city of Ariel, was released from Schneider Children's Hospital in Petach Tikva on Sunday. Her life is no longer in danger. She is, however, only partially conscious. 
Accompanied by her family, Adelle was transferred to the pediatric and youth unit of the Beit Levinstein rehabilitation facility in Ra'anana, northeast of Tel Aviv.

Peres: My Words were Coordinated with Netanyahu

Following criticism of his speech on Sunday to the World Economic Forum in Jordan, in which he supported the two-state solution to the Arab-Israeli conflict and called Chairman Mahmoud Abbas of the Palestinian Authority a peace partner, President Shim'on Peres said his words were coordinated with Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu, according to a Monday-morning report by the Ma'ariv daily.
Talking to Israeli reporters before the speech, Peres made it clear that the two discussed the speech on Friday. The Prime Minister's Office chose not to respond to the question of coordination between the two.

UPDATE:

Just as I said: Gantz, i.e. Yaalon, i.e. Bibi, are willing to SACRIFICE the Jews of Judea and Samaria on the altar of peace. That is MURDER, plain and simple. That is MOLECH stuff. That is UNJEWISH, that is CRIMINAL, and that is UNACCEPTABLE.

All these people have to be considered MURDERERS, and have to be dealt with as such. Each and every one of them will have to be held to account for their shameful sell-out of their fellow Jews to a cruel enemy. I am sure G-d Himself is keeping tab of their deeds.  

Gantz Tells Knesset Why IDF Can't Protect Jews

Chief of Staff explained that changing IDF's open-fire orders will lead to escalation and loss of control.

By Gil Ronen

First Publish: 5/28/2013, 11:35 AM

IDF Chief of Staff Gantz

IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Benny Gantz explained to the Knesset Tuesday why, in his view, the IDF cannot offer protection to the Jews of Judea and Samaria by firing at Arabs who terrorize them on the roads and in their homes on a daily basis.

Speaking in the Knesset's Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee, Gantz acknowledged that “There is pressure by Knesset Members to change the orders for opening fire.”

However, he went on, “If we let go of the reins, there will be escalation and we will lose control.”

Gantz said that the briefings given to soldiers in the field before they go on security missions “need to be improved” but that in the end, the soldiers will continue to operate “in accordance with the present orders, without changing them.”

He added: “We give Nitzan Alon our backing.”

Major General Nitzan Alon is the Head of Central Command. He was appointed by Ehud Barak and is seen as a left-wing general by many leaders of the Jewish settlement enterprise. These leaders believe – or believed until today – that the current defeatist spirit of instructions to IDF soldiers can be gotten rid of, if Alon is replaced by someone else.

Alon appeared before the Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee last week, and representatives of the Jewish communities had hoped to face him directly in the presence of MKs. This plan was forestalled when Alon insisted on the settlers' leaving the room before he began to speak, and it later became clear that Minister of Defense, Moshe Yaalon, had given his backing to this precondition.

The Knesset has recently been told that rock throwing attacks in Judea and Samaria are up threefold from 2011, and firebomb attacks are up fourfold. IDF soldiers are complaining that current IDF instructions forbid them from firing at terrorists except in the most extreme of circumstances. Rock and fire bomb attacks are taking place not just against vehicles on the roads but even against homes and people walking inside their communities.


And more of the same... read the comments below the text too, they are good. Something really needs to be done, and I am all for it. Maybe it is time for a major campaign here too: NO GUN CONTROL IN ISRAEL! SECOND AMENDMENT RIGHTS IN ISRAEL! "EVERY JEW A 22"! The PTB will hate it, but if the campaign reaches a certain momentum, compliments of Americans who understand the Second Amendment, we might be able to get some result before things get totally out of control - for us, not for Gantz and his ilk.

‘This Isn’t Jerusalem, it’s Palestine’

Jerusalem woman describes daily Arab terror. ‘The situation gets worse from day to day.’

By Maayana Miskin

First Publish: 5/29/2013, 8:27 AM

Man waves PLO flag in Jerusalem

Ten years ago Batya Kayman and her newlywed husband decided to move from New York to Jerusalem and to build their home in the Jewish state. The couple moved to the tree-lined, middle-class French Hill (Givah Hatzarfatit) neighborhood in northern Jerusalem, fulfilling their dream of aliyah.
Now, ten years on, the dream is becoming a nightmare, Batya Kayman told Arutz Sheva.
Jewish families in the neighborhood, which borders on Hadassah Mount Scopus Hospital, are constantly harassed by Arab youth from nearby Arab neighborhoods, she said. The harassment has grown so bad that she fears to leave her home.
“The Arabs from the villages come here in organized groups. They go into parks and courtyards and steal everything, and they often use violence,” she related.
She described just one recent incident of many, “Yesterday two Arabs came into our backyard and ate fruit from our tree. I told them to go away. They told me this isn’t Jerusalem, it’s Palestine, and the house belongs to them.”
“There were four arson attacks here last Friday. The situation is getting worse here from day to day,” she continued. “We don’t want Jerusalem to become an Arab city.”
Other families are afraid as well, she said, “There’s a park here on Abba Berditchev Street. The Arabs flood it every afternoon, spitting, acting crazy. People are afraid to leave their homes and come here.”
Israelis living in the neighborhood have started to take steps to protect themselves, she noted. “We asked the city to station guards here. At the same time, we’re trying to organize a civilian patrol group.”
City officials sent a statement in response, “The city of Jerusalem takes acts of violence in the French Hill neighborhood very seriously, and has acted and will continue to act in cooperation with the police… to improve residents’ sense of security.”
“In recent months, the city invested many resources in the neighborhood,” the statement continued, “among them putting in security cameras, adding lights for safety, improving the security system in neighborhood schools… The City Council leadership, led by the Mayor, is also working with police to improve the sense of safety and the response to violent incidents in the neighborhood.”
Israeli Jewish families living in French Hill have complained of Arab harassment for several years. In late 2012 the campaign of terror escalated with the stabbing of an Israeli woman in front of her two young children, and arson attacks which police agreed had “nationalist motives.”

 http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/168422#.UaW_J9j-vKc

UPDATE on "Cosmic event....": so, what is this supposed to mean? Experts to the rescue, please! Plus: OUCH! CFR type US Jews freaked out by Levy report.

Emergency Situation at the Electric Company

The Israel Electric Company declared an emergency situation, Sunday evening, after the fall of two production units in Alon Tabor and Gezer. Following the malfunction, the utility's reserves fell from 11,800 megawatts to 11,200 MW. Demand on Sunday was recorded as high as 11,000 MW.
It's the second time in a week that an emergency has been declared at the electric company.


 http://www.space.com/16587-solar-storm-bombarding-earth-now.html

" As the forerunner solar wind protons continue a steady increase, indicators that the CME is on the way, the wait continues for it to impact the Earth's magnetic field," center officials wrote in an update. "Look for that in the next few hours."


  http://www.capitolcolumn.com/news/nasa-major-solar-storm-batters-earth/

See earlier post here:

 Cosmic event politicians "forgot" to mention: no c...

On another note: sold-out CFR types American Jewish leftists are freaking out; the truth is hitting them on the head like a lead hammer. What will they do when Mashiach comes????

Photo by: Abed Omar Qusini / Reuters US Jewish leaders 'deeply concerned' over Levy report By JTA 15/07/2012 Forty prominent Jewish leaders send letter to Netanyahu, saying report places two-state solutionm, Israel's standing in int'l community in peril; Bronfman, former White House official, JAFI head among signatories.

Forty American Jewish leaders sent a letter to Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu on Sunday, expressing concerns about the findings of the Levy Committee regarding the legality of Jewish settlements in the West Bank. The letter was initiated and organized by the Israel Policy Forum. "As strong advocates for Israel’s security and well-being as a Jewish and democratic state, we are deeply concerned about the recent findings of the government commission led by [retired Supreme Court Justice] Edmund Levy. We fear that if approved, this report will place the two-state solution, and the prestige of Israel as a democratic member of the international community, in peril," the letter read. Signatories to the letter include philanthropists Charles Bronfman and Lester Crown; Marvin Lender Former National Chairman of UJA; Deborah Lipstadt, Dorot Professor of Modern Jewish History and Holocaust Studies at Emory University; Bernard Nussbaum, former White House Counsel; Richard Pearlstone, former chairman of the Jewish Agency; and Rabbi David Saperstein, director of the Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism. The Levy Committee, which was formed by Netanyahu and headed by former Supreme Court Justice Edmond Levy, said in its 89-page report released last week that “Israel does not meet the criteria of ‘military occupation’ as defined under international law” in the West Bank, and that therefore settlements and West Bank outposts are legal. The report recommends changing the legal regulations concerning Jewish settlement in the West Bank in the areas of zoning, demolitions and building. The findings of the committee are subject to the review and approval of  Attorney-General Yehuda Weinstein. "Securing Israel’s future as a Jewish and democratic state requires diplomatic and political leadership, not legal maneuverings," the US Jewish leaders continued. "We recognize and regret that the Palestinian Authority has abdicated leadership by not returning to the negotiating table. Nonetheless, our great fear is that the Levy Report will not strengthen Israel's position in this conflict, but rather add fuel to those who seek to delegitimize Israel’s right to exist." "At this moment, it is more critical than ever that Israel strengthen its claim in the international community that it is committed to a two-state vision, which is, in turn, central to Israel’s future as a Jewish and democratic state," the letter concluded.  And just as a reminder: read here about the role of Edgar Bronfman, the brother of Charles Bronfman mentioned here, in the Bilateral Agreement with the Vatican: he was neck deep in doodoo, i.e. in double -dealing for Rome. A Bronfman should be the last person to be trusted when it comes to Israel! Charles Bronfman himself is a CFR member. The other '"leaders" are made of the same mold, maybe not as obvious.  http://israeltruthtimes.blogspot.co.il/2009/03/perfect-crime-vaticans-plot-to-rob-am_31.html  The problem is Bibi. He will get scared and back off. He is also a CFR member, Barry just sent out a post to remind us all of Bibi's deep connections to ROMNEY via the CFR. I am afraid Bibi will bury the report, or at least refuse to act upon it. Those guys are just messengers, both for Rome, for Washington, and for themselves, "their own Tuchesses", as somebody aptly put it. They know the fix is in, if this passes they are toast. And Clinton here for damage control - no friendly visit I am sure - they want this report like a hole in the head: Barak to Meet Clinton in Jerusalem Defense Minister Ehud Barak will meet on Monday with U.S. Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, at the David Citadel Hotel in Jerusalem. Clinton, who is currently in the region, met over the weekend with Egyptian president Mohammed Morsi. While in Israel, she also scheduled to meet with Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu and President Shimon Peres.   Finally, from Jack: Israel is obligated to facilitate America's relations with Israel's enemies, even to the extent of taking casualties without fighting back. It is not acceptable for Jews to fight back. We are supposed to run to a powerful non-Jewish protector to defend us. To ensure that our protector will in fact protect us in the hour of need, we have to constantly suck up to our protector and make sure that we are so useful and so valuable to him that he will reckon it in his interest to do so. That has been the only acceptable strategy of Jewish “self defense” most of the time for the last 2,700 years. Jews are always allowed to grovel in self defense. What if our enemies are more useful and more valuable to our protectors than we? What if President Bush has finally grasped the fact that the Jews don't have any oil and the Arabs do? Contrary to what the whole world believes, the Arabs also have a lot more money.  That’s not all. In the memorable words of Billy Carter, "There's a lot more Arabs than there is Jews". What if Bush, our protector, has grasped all that? Well, then we Jews are supposed to wring our hands and cry "Oy veh!" And die, of course. But on no account are we to fight back. That is anathema to Moslems. In Islamic law, it is forbidden for a Jew (or a Christian, by the way) to strike a Moslem for any reason whatsoever. The Christians might as well have had such a law because it is similarly utterly repugnant and unacceptable to the Christian world for Jews to defend themselves. So, when rioters attack Israeli military positions with stones and fire bombs and with gunmen among the rioters with AK-47 assault rifles, Israel may not fire on them. That's "excessive force". But UN "peacekeepers" in Sierra Leone fired on rioters throwing stones, ABSENT the gunmen with sub-machine guns. So did police in Goteborg, Genoa and Cincinnati, likewise in the absence of gunmen. No one condemned them for "excessive force" because they have the right of self-defense. They aren't Jews. No one picked up on it. Not even the Jewish papers or the Israeli media. Did no one notice? Or would it just not be smart to say such a thing where your protector can hear? “Shah! Stille! [Sh! Be quiet!] You’ll get us in trouble.” Jack Golbert  http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/07/jews_and_american_conservatism.html

Whom do you believe? Has Dorit Beinisch been corrupted by a $20 million grant from the Ford Foundation, yes, or no? And if she HAS been corrupted, should she be allowed to stay at the bench even one more day? Shouldn't all her former decisions be re-examined as well?

 Thank you, Yisrael Medad, for bringing this extremely important information to our attention:

 

• http://myrightword.blogspot.com/2010/08/beinisch-goes-slumming.html

 See below:

 http://www.blogger.com/post-edit.g?blogID=6632148178430811066&postID=8484890835127530354&from=pencil

 $20 million did exchange hands in September 2007, this is fact.
 http://www.fordfoundation.org/newsroom/news-from-ford/208

Let's try to analyze the various possibilities:

Did the New Israel Fund website make a mistake in its caption? 

Did Dorit Beinisch see the check at all?
  
Was she only the conduit for the check? 

Did she accept the check for herself and the NIF? 

( I am playing the devil's advocate here, since some people blindly assume that the $20 million went straight into her pockets. So let's assume a best case scenario).

Either way, she was somehow involved in that momentous grant from the Ford Foundation to the NIF, or her picture would not have appeared in this context, with all the specific people mentioned here. One way or another, she KNOWS that the Ford Foundation is funding the NIF and all its subsidiaries, and every time a court case involving one of those said NGO's is taking place, she knows exactly who is buttering that bread, she knows who is watching, she knows who her friends are, and where the money is coming from. She knows that in a court case involving one of those NGO's, one of the litigants is none other than the Ford Foundation; with other words, the CFR, the most important behind-the- scenes political force of the U.S.A., since the Ford Foundation, by definition, is one of the main pillars of the CFR, the Council on Foreign Relations, where the initials sometimes stand for Carnegie- Ford- Rockefeller. Not to mention the strong Nazi connections of Henry Ford, the founder and precursor of the Ford Foundation: 
http://www.undueinfluence.com/ford.htm
 http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/daily/nov98/nazicars30.htm

Is that called a bribe, yes, or no? According to Torah law, she would HAVE to excuse herself from the case. What about according to the law of the land?
 

We knew all along she was in the hands of enemy and/or foreign governments - basically the same thing. But this close?! A good thing this is surfacing now. 

2. Ford Foundation Gives Additional $20 Million to Support Partnership with New Israel Fund

NEW YORK / JERUSALEM, 6 September 2007—The Ford Foundation today announced a $20 million grant to extend its partnership with the New Israel Fund to support civil society, human rights and social justice organizations in Israel.
The partnership was launched in 2003 with an initial Ford grant of $20 million.
"We are proud to renew our partnership with the New Israel Fund to support people working on social justice issues," said Susan V. Berresford, president of the Ford Foundation. "This grant is in keeping with the foundation's worldwide program to promote democratic values and will help secure peace and equality for all citizens."

 
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/151289#.TwC9C3rTPgF

Tevet 6, 5772, 01/01/12 09:49

Court Ombudsman: Beinisch-NIF-Ford Foundation Meeting Just Fine

Judicial system's ombudsman says there was no ethical problem with Supreme Court President hosting NIF heads.

Gil Ronen

Supreme Court President Dorit Beinisch did not receive a contribution from the Ford Foundation on behalf of the New Israel Fund, Court System Ombudsman Judge (ret.) Eliezer Goldberg determined last week. News site News1 reported that Goldberg based his "findings" on Beinisch's version and nothing else.

The Ombudsman received three complaints in late November, based upon a photograph that appeared in the NIF website. According to the complainants, the text under the photograph said that Beinsich had received $20 million on behalf of the NIF from the Ford Foundation. The photograph was taken on September 17, 2007, on the 15th anniversary of Shatil, the NIF's operational arm.

The picture shows a beaming Beinisch with Susan Berresford, then-President of the Ford Foundation. Behind them, according to MyRightWord's Yisrael Meidad, are Israel Executive Director of the New Israel Fund, Eliezer Yaari; NIF Board VP in Israel Neta Ziv; Ford Foundation Deputy Vice President, Program Management David Chiel; Ford Israel Fund Director Aaron Back; and NIF CEO Larry Garber.

The complainants noted that the NIF website has blocked access to the photograph.

Goldberg called the complaints "baseless" and said there was "no connection between them and the true facts."

Beinisch told him that she regularly meets representatives of different organizations, from all parts of the political spectrum. She said that the NIF asked to coordinate a visit in the Supreme Court for the Ford Foundation's president and that "I met them briefly in the oval room in my bureau… The complaints that I received a $20 million donation on behalf of the New Israel Fund are a false, malicious and baseless libel…"

News1 reports that Goldberg accepted Beinisch's version of events unquestioningly and determined that the picture documented "a short courtesy meeting" and nothing more.

NIF-supported organizations such as the Association for Civil Rights in Israel, Adala, the Women's Lobby and Itach (which is headed by Neta Ziv, among others) regularly petition the High Court and appear before Beinisch as litigants.

Finally:

Here are Dorit Beinisch's friends - the Ford Foundation is mentioned by name ( at 10:19). So please tell me, are the Chassidim right, or wrong, to wear a yellow star as a sign of protest against the rule she enforces?

Post-Pessach musings: Israel and the media, media bias, and what we should do about it. Even Israelis are starting to wake up... could it be???

Ben Yosef Livnat, murdered by PA "policemen", American trained, mind you. It's all his fault, of course.

 
Are the media biased?

Most if not all major media, both in the US and in Israel, are controlled by corporations and individuals with clear allegiances to the PTB, i.e. the CFR, the UN, and/or the Vatican, and therefore follow their agenda. They, in turn, want us to return to the "Auschwitz borders". The ultimate goal: to finish the job that Hitler started.


The New York Times as an example:

Their role in the Holocaust, and how they contributed to the death of innumerable Jews:

Buried by the Times: The Holocaust and America's Most Important Newspaper 

 May 2005

The New York Times consistently buried Holocaust news in its back pages and downplayed the victims' Jewish identity. So states the first scholarly study of how the Times covered the Nazi genocide. Buried by The Times: The Holocaust and America's Most Important Newspaper," by Prof. Laurel Leff, has just been published by Cambridge University Press.
Among the book's key findings, according to The David S. Wyman Institute for Holocaust Studies, are the following:
* Holocaust news was consistently relegated to the Times' back pages. Of the 1,186 articles that the Times published during 1939-1945 about Europe's Jews, only 26 (about two percent) of them appeared on the front page, and even those articles "obscured the fact that most of the victims were Jews."
* New York Times publisher Arthur Sulzberger, an assimilated Jew of German descent, feared that the newspaper would be engaging in special pleading and thus deliberately downplayed news of the Holocaust and the Jewish identity of the victims.
* The Times only rarely published editorials about the annihilation of Europe's Jews, and only once ran a lead editorial about the Nazi genocide.

Stuart Eizenstat, formerly the U.S. ambassador for Holocaust-era issues, called the book "engrossing and important," adding, "One can only wonder in great sorrow how many lives might have been saved if the nation's and the world's conscience had been touched by full and complete coverage by the Times of what remains the greatest crime of world history."

*******************************************************************

The Sultzbergers are Meshumadim:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthur_Ochs_Sulzberger,_Jr.

Arthur Ochs Sulzberger, Jr. (born September 22, 1951) became the publisher of The New York Times in 1992 and chairman of the board of its owner, The New York Times Company, in 1997, succeeding his father, Arthur Ochs Sulzberger.....

....He was raised an Episcopalian, but no longer observes the religion.....


******************************************************************************

They tightly control the newspaper, therefore its content:

NEW YORK (AP) — A Morgan Stanley investment fund is stepping up its confrontation with The New York Times Co. (NYT) with the submission Wednesday of a shareholder proposal that would urge the company's board to take several steps to "reform" its corporate governance practices.

The proposal, if it is approved at the company's next shareholder meeting, would recommend that the board put to a vote the company's dual-class share structure, which allows members of the Ochs-Sulzberger family to control the company through a special class of stock.
...........................

It would also recommend that the roles of chairman and publisher of the Times' flagship newspaper be separated. Both jobs are currently held by Arthur Sulzberger Jr.....
The Times has defended its governance practices and noted that the longstanding dual-class share provision can only be changed by members of the controlling Ochs-Sulzberger family, who have not signaled that they intend to do so.

*******************************************************************************

Such votes are essentially symbolic because the Ochs-Sulzberger family controls most of the voting stock.

In a speech, Sulzberger said the dual-class structure protects long-term stability and has resulted in a "very strong stock price" in the past.

"It is not an accident that what are generally agreed to be the three best newspapers in the U.S. -- The Times, The Wall Street Journal and The Washington Post -- all have this capital structure in common," he said.

************************************************************************************************

http://www.newsweek.com/2009/05/12/all-the-news-that-s-fit-to-buy.html

"Sulzberger is chairman of the company, but more importantly the leading member of the Sulzberger-Ochs family, which has controlled the publishing company for 113 years."


************************************************************

The Sultzberger family are fully affiliated with the PTB.

Their loyalties are to the Council on Foreign Relations, 



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-FPAQlbmlSc

Arthur Hays Sulzberger                BB/CFR/J
Arthur Ochs ("Punch") Sulzberger         CFR
Cyrus L. Sulzberger                   BB/CFR
Hays Sulzberger                          CFR
Ochs Sulzberger                          CFR

********************************************************************************

Who is who in the Sultzberger family: Family tree with pics

http://nymag.com/news/articles/08/10/20081013_sulzberger.pdf


********************************************************************************

... In the words of one professional, fierce - and Jewish - critic: the NY Times is anti-Semitic - and certainly anti-Israel:

http://jbuff.com/c031507.htm  Professor Gerhard Falk:

"Today, The Times pretends not to know that Hamas, the Arab terrorist gang, seeks to kill all Jews, wherever they may be. Instead, The Times portrays this gang of killers as a social service organization. Likewise, Hizbollah, another Nazi Arab gang of murderers, is labeled by The Times as a social, agricultural and welfare organization."
*********************************************************************************

And now, about the PTB's methods:

• http://www.ndc.nato.int/download/bios/Techau_ENG.pdf

• 21 Feb 2011 ... What Makes Communication Strategic? – Preparing Military Organizations for the Battle of Ideas Jan TECHAU Research Paper

file:///C:/DOCUME~1/Daisy/LOCALS~1/Temp/rp_65.pdf


*********************************************************************************

... And how their methods are reminiscent of Hitler's methods.....

"The function of propaganda does not lie in the scientific training of the individual, but in calling the masses' attention to certain facts, processes, and necessities, whose significance is thus for the first time placed within their field of vision. The whole art consists in doing this so skillfully that everyone will be convinced that the fact is real, the process necessary, the necessity correct."
-- Hitler
http://www.psywarrior.com/Goebbels.html

German Nazi Party member Joseph Goebbels became Adolf Hitler's propaganda minister in 1933, which gave him power over all German radio, press, cinema, and theater.....

His work as a propagandist materially aided Hitler's rise to power in 1933.

As Reichsminister for Propaganda and National Enlightenment, Goebbels was given complete control over radio, press, cinema, and theater; later he also regimented all German culture. Goebbels placed his undeniable intelligence and his brilliant insight into mass psychology entirely at the service of his party. His most virulent propaganda was against the Jews.

********************************************************************************



So what can we do about it?

Understand the power of the media, the power of propaganda.

COPY what the enemies of the Jewish People are doing, doing exactly what they are doing, using their very own methods.

Buy radio stations, broadcast.

Go on YouTube, start your own channel. If you can, start a TV station broadcasting TRUTH.

Write blogs.

Use Facebook and other social media.

Go on speaking tours.

COMMUNICATE, COMMUNICATE, COMMUNICATE.

TELL THE TRUTH, shine light on the deceivers:

"In a time of universal deceit, TELLING THE TRUTH is a revolutionary act."
-- George Orwell


*************************************************************************
 

Even the Israelis are starting to get it, who would have thought:

http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/143702

Major General (reserves) Uzi Dayan, re: the gruesome murder of Limor Livnat's nephew at Kever Yosef on Motsaei Shabbat:

"To my sorrow the media.... sets the agenda. ..... It is necessary to follow the security agenda rather than the media agenda..."

Lots of new, explosive info about Libya and Israel; but first read my disclaimer below, please: the title of the video is not correct!

 
Disclaimer:

B"H

To all, Shalom.

Here is my latest interview on the Barry Chamish show. Honestly, I think it is worth listening to. However, please be warned of the following:

First of all, I never said or implied that NATO is controlling both sides of the conflict. That is the creator of the video's interpretation, not mine - not even Barry's, apparently. I said, the CFR, with other words, the NWO, ROME, is controlling both sides. NATO at this point is controlling the rebel side, they are siding with the Muslim brotherhood . The Vatican is on the side of Gaddhafi, and essentially claims to want peace in Libya, yet all the while supporting NATO fully; I think they are not happy to see Arabs die, what they want to see is JEWS die! Libya is testing ground. And of course NATO and the US want Libyan GOLD, Libyan OIL, etc.

Follow Ben Ami, you get to Shimon Peres and Rome.

Follow NATO, you get to Rome.

But NATO could play their opposition to Israel in this particular war, so if they want, they can expel Israel, and go to war against Israel, which is their ultimate goal, in my opinion.

So essentially ROME is playing both sides. Not NATO.


In addition, I made a couple of errors: for instance, Shlomo Ben-Ami is not the head of the Toledo Center for Peace, he is its vice-president. 

 I also erred slightly regarding the exact date of the disturbances in Benghazi. They actually started on February 15, but the planned "DAY OF RAGE" of the protestors took place on February 17, at which time it was countered by the killing of protesters by Gaddhafi's forces:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2011_Libyan_civil_war

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/feb/20/libya-protests-benghazi-muammar-gaddafi

I apologize for these errors.

Hopefully I will find the time to write about this topic soon, and give links to all my sources and articles.

There are four parts to this interview, this video is part I, the other three parts are linked below. May I suggest you listen to all of them.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N9H5AoIs3cY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b6be2QuVrwI
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8YTHoc3w1dE

See also:

That is exactly my thinking: Libya is a test case...
 
http://israeltruthtimes.blogspot.com/2011/04/who-is-really-behind-infamous-facebook.html

And here are some comments:

Eric Phelps writes:

You are right.  Rome is playing both sides, not NATO---that Nazi vassal of the Pope.

Further, Gaddhafi is a papal Knight of Malta with massive financial holdings in Italy.  Thus, Gaddhafi is pretending to really wage a war but he is really killing his own Berber people, ancient enemies of Rome since the days the Berbers occupied Spain (750-1492).  In the end, all of North Africa will be in the hands of the Pope’s Muslim Brotherhood, established by the Order in Cairo, 1928 (same year the Order created Opus Dei in Spain).  And the Muslim Brotherhood has a prominent Knight of Malta in its ranks....  Meanwhile, Rome delights in the killing of Arab descendants of Ishmael (Egyptians especially) as well as the Jews descending from Jacob

E.writes:

So

what's the hope?  In the Talmud it says that separation between Rome and Germany is necessary to stop evil from spreading, perhps separating between Rome and NATO is the key- are our leaders that smart?

UPDATE:

Libyan Rebels Sold Hizbollah and Hamas Chemical Shells « Daily News

http://www.israelunitycoalition.org/news/?p=6550
April 1, 2011

Senior Libyan rebel “officers” sold Hizballah and Hamas thousands of chemical shells from the stocks of mustard and nerve gas that fell into rebel hands when they overran Muammar Qaddafi’s military facilities in and around Benghazi, debkafile’s exclusive military and intelligence sources report.

Word of the capture touched off a scramble in Tehran and among the terrorist groups it sponsors to get hold of their first unconventional weapons.

According to our sources, the rebels offloaded at least 2,000 artillery shells carrying mustard gas and 1,200 nerve gas shells for cash payment amounting to several million dollars.

US and Israeli intelligence agencies have tracked the WMD consignments from eastern Libya as far as Sudan in convoys secured by Iranian agents and Hizballah and Hamas guards. They are not believed to have reached their destinations in Lebanon and the Gaza Strip, apparently waiting for an opportunity to get their deadly freights through without the US or Israel attacking and destroying them.

It is also not clear whether the shells and gases were assembled upon delivery or were travelling in separate containers. Our sources report that some of the poison gas may be intended not only for artillery use but also for drones which Hizballah recently acquired from Iran.

Tehran threw its support behind the anti-Qaddafi rebels because of this unique opportunity to get hold of the Libyan ruler’s stock of poison gas after it fell into opposition hands and arm Hizballah and Hamas with unconventional weapons without Iran being implicated in the transaction.

Shortly after the uprising began in the third week of February, a secret Iranian delegation arrived in Benghazi. Its members met rebel chiefs, some of them deserters from the Libyan army, and clinched the deal for purchasing the entire stock of poison gas stock and the price.

The rebels threw in a quantity of various types of anti-air missiles.

Hizballah and Hamas purchasing missions arrived in the first week of March to finalize the deal and arrange the means of delivery.

The first authoritative American source to refer to a Hizballah presence in Benghazi was the commander of US NATO forces Adm. James Stavridis. When he addressed a US Senate committee on Tuesday, March 29, he spoke of “telltale signs of the presence of Islamic insurgents led by Al-Qaeda and Hizballah” on the rebel side of the Libyan war. He did not disclose what they were doing there.

In our enemies' own words, Saudi Arabia's relationship to the U.S. and G.B.; think of the billions of barrels of oil and gas found in Israel recently: isn't it exactly the scenario here? Who is getting rich off our oil and gas? Who is funding exploration?

IS OIL ONE MAJOR REASON FOR THE INTEREST OF THE WEST IN CONQUERING ISRAEL - THE QUARTET, OBAMA, GREAT BRITAIN, RUSSIA, GERMANY, ETC.?

THE POPE IS INTERESTED IN JERUSALEM, WHILE  BANKRUPT AND OIL-STARVED WESTERN GOVERNMENTS WANT ISRAEL'S OIL AND GAS; PERFECT PARTNERS!

There are two ways to go about getting our oil: befriend the country, or conquer the country. Right now, the country is being conquered in a friendly manner - friendly, that is, to the treasonous and sold-out left, while deadly to nationalist Jews. How much is Shimon Peres making from all these deals? After all, Yitshak Tshuva  is a partner and great friend of Shimon Peres. This explanation does shed a light on the situation, wouldn't you say?   

http://israeltruthtimes.blogspot.com/2010/09/in-secret-or-so-they-hoped-planning.html

  ( long but relevant article: Tshuva mentioned towards the end)

 http://www.forbes.com/lists/2006/81/biz_06israel_Yitzhak-Tshuva_3J3M.html

How Israel could revolutionize the global energy sector

By DORE GOLD 
03/11/2011 17:04

New data suggests Israel may not only have much larger gas resources than believed, but also the 3rd largest deposit of oil shale in the world.

  Libyan oil accounts for less than 2 percent of world oil production, yet the revolt against Muammar Gaddafi has managed to shoot up the price of oil to more than $100 per barrel in the last month.

No one knows how long the internal instability in the Middle East will last, but according to the US Department of Energy, its share of the world’s total oil supply is expected to actually increase in the years ahead.


Simply, the world is using up the reserves of non- Middle East oil more quickly. Moreover, of the trillion barrels of proven reserves still left, according to the CIA roughly 800 billion barrels are to be found in the Middle East and North Africa, especially in Saudi Arabia, Iran and Iraq.

The implications for Israel of the West’s growing dependence on Middle Eastern oil are troubling, for obvious reasons. Yet there are two new developments in our energy sector that could well offset these trends and eventually alter our standing in the world, especially with respect to Europe.

First, the gas discoveries in the Eastern Mediterranean, which began to produce commercial quantities of natural gas in 2004, are generally well-known. The Tamar field, which should begin production in 2013, is expected to supply all of Israel’s domestic requirements for at least 20 years. The Economist suggested in November 2010 that the recently discovered Leviathan field, which has twice the gas of Tamar, could be completely devoted to exports.

All the undersea gas fields together have about 25 trillion cubic feet of gas, but the potential for further discoveries is considerably greater, given that the US Geological Survey estimates that there are 122 trillion cubic feet of gas in the whole Levant Basin, most of which is within Israel’s jurisdiction.
After the Leviathan discovery these numbers could go up further. Perhaps for that reason, Greece has been talking to Israel about creating a transportation hub for distributing gas throughout Europe from the Eastern Mediterranean that will come from undersea pipelines.

What is less well-known, but even more dramatic, is the work being done on this country’s oil shale. The British-based World Energy Council reported in November 2010 that Israel had oil shale from which it is possible to extract the equivalent of 4 billion barrels of oil. Yet these numbers are currently undergoing a major revision internationally.

A new assessment was released late last year by Dr. Yuval Bartov, chief geologist for Israel Energy Initiatives, at the yearly symposium of the prestigious Colorado School of Mines. He presented data that our oil shale reserves are actually the equivalent of 250 billion barrels (that compares with 260 billion barrels in the proven reserves of Saudi Arabia).
Independent oil industry analysts have been carefully looking at the shale, and have not refuted these findings. As a consequence of these new estimates, we may emerge as the third largest deposit of oil shale, after the US and China.

OIL SHALE mining used to be a dirty business that used up tremendous amounts of water and energy.

Yet new technologies, being developed for Israeli shale, seek to separate the oil from the shale rock 300 meters underground; these techniques actually produce water, rather than use it up.

The technology will be tested in a pilot project followed by a demonstration stage. It will be critical to demonstrate that the underground separation of oil from shale is environmentally sound before going to full-scale production. The present goal is to produce commercial quantities of shale oil by the end of the decade.

This particular project has global significance.

For if Israel develops a unique method for separating oil from shale deep underground, that has none of the negative ecological side-effects of earlier oil shale efforts, that technology can be made available to the whole world, changing the entire global oil market. The effect of the spread of this technology would be to shift the center of gravity of world oil away from Iran, Saudi Arabia and the Persian Gulf to more stable states that have no history of backing terrorism or radical Islamic causes. (In the Arab world, Jordan and Morocco have the most significant oil shale deposits.) WHEN WILL the West begin to treat Israel as a powerful energy giant and not as a weak client state that must be pressured? In the case of the Saudis, when the US realized the true extent of their oil reserves, after America’s reserves in Texas and Oklahoma were depleted by World War II, it sought to upgrade its military and diplomatic ties with the Saudi kingdom even before its production capacity was fully exploited. The US-Saudi connection grew as massive infrastructure investments for moving Saudi oil to Western markets were made, like the Trans-Arabian Pipeline (TAPLINE).

More capital was needed for the Saudi oil project. US companies, like Standard Oil of New Jersey (today, Exxon) and Standard Oil of New York (Mobil), joined Texaco and Standard Oil of California, the original holder of the Saudi oil concession, and created the ARAMCO consortium in the late 1940s. ARAMCO executives came to be regular guests at the State Department, where they could present the Saudi perspective.

In time, Saudi Arabia’s status grew as its future position in world oil came to be appreciated.

In the case of Israel, updated international reports verifying the true dimensions of both its undersea gas and oil shale should be forthcoming in the next year.

Many more international companies are likely to take an interest in its energy sector at that time. Moreover, the full exploitation of these energy resources will require massive infrastructure investment for pipelines, liquified natural gas plants and new oil exporting outlets in the Mediterranean and Red Sea.

Israel is uniquely situated by its geographical position and is able to direct its energy exports to either Europe or China and India. It may not have the capital to build this export capacity, but the involvement of foreign investors in these projects will give European and American banks new interests in developments.
Western policies will not change overnight. Nonetheless, Israel needs to tell the full story of its newly emerging role in the world energy sector if it wants to begin to alter the way it has been handled internationally.

The writer is president of the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs and served as ambassador to the UN.

Bibi Part II: duress or no duress, Bibi is talking such vacuous nonsense. Bibi, who gave you the right to squander our inheritance and endanger Jewish lives once again? WE KNOW THEY ARE THREATENING YOUR LIFE, WE ARE WITH YOU. BUT YOU MUST STAND FIRM, YOU MUST!

Bibi's Speech at Conference of Presidents of Major Jewish Organizations,  Wednesday,July 7th, 2010, New York

Thanks to Nurit.

What is Bibi saying: HE WANTS A U.N. WITH TEETH! Whose language is that, please tell me? WHO coined that phrase first? Isn't it exactly the content, and the exact same words, of the pope's encyclical, CARITAS IN VERITATE? This is one more proof to me that Bibi is being GUIDED AND INFLUENCED BY ROME, whether via Obama or not, whether by Ban-Ki Moon or not, whether by a message from Rome or not, whether under duress or not,  and whether his life is being threatened or not.

See also:

http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/138492

Make sure to also read:

http://israeltruthtimes.blogspot.com/2010/07/bibi-enigma-was-getting-us-all-confused.html

****************

This is a short clip of what happened in front of the CFR on Thursday. Demonstration and counter-demonstration, with Neturei Karta as usual featured prominently together with Arabs and other die-hard antisemites.

It is really a shame that those Neturei Karta give all of the Haredim a bad name, because they dress alike. Most Haredim would never, ever say "God damn Israel".

I am also opposed to the government, I also want to see it destroyed and replaced by a righteous government, and of course, Bibi's words do not reflect my views, just as they do not reflect Israel's Jewish population views, of course, since he is speaking for the PTB , the CFR, and their handlers above them; but would I even DREAM of standing on the other side of the street? Don't these evil people know what that represents?

************

  
To get back to the previous day, Wednesday....




....Of course he went to the United Nations, meeting with  Ban Ki-Moon ( 2 days AFTER the queen's visit). What do you think: WAS there , or WASN'T there , a message for Bibi from the queen,  with other words from Benedikt?

"Prime Minister Netanyahu addressed national Jewish leaders, as well as political, civic and business leaders, at a meeting Wednesday in New York, sponsored by the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations. Earlier he had met with UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon after conducting talks with U.S. President Barack Obama in Washington. (INN)"

To be noted that 7/7 is also the anniversary of the London bombing, and I can understand Queen Elizabeth II honoring that day. She did that by visiting the World Trade Center and laying a wreath there. But I have a couple of questions: why come to the U.S. to commemorate a strictly British disaster? And what does going to the United Nations headquarters have to do with that? The answer is: absolutely nothing. She specifically chose the U.N. because that is what the headquarters of the PTB, i.e. Rome, had decided. She could also have gone to the United Nations in Geneva, Switzerland, for instance, which is much closer to her home; I am sure  Ban-Ki Moon would have made the effort to meet her there: why did she have to come specifically to New York, which is a much more difficult trip for an 84 year old lady, in 105 degree weather? There is no doubt that she came to the U.S. on a MISSION: she came to the U.S. because Bibi was also scheduled to be there at the exact same time, so that a message could be relayed to him - via the United Nations. Bibi's visit was also obviously timed for 7/7; she came a day before, and symmetrically, he came a day after. The timing of this visit was scheduled deliberately for the anniversary of Caritas in Veritate, when Benedikt originally declared his intention of a "U.N. with teeth," that is, a U.N. willing to use military force, ANY force, to achieve the pope's goal: the Holy Roman Empire, with its capital in Jerusalem.

NOTICE THAT BIBI'S MEEK SPEECH AT THE PRESIDENT'S CONFERENCE HAPPENED  AFTER HIS MEETING AT THE UNITED NATIONS. Was he handed a special letter there? I wonder. It would not be unusual for the pope to do that.

NOW WE UNDERSTAND BIBI'S MEEK , BLAND AND DILUTED POSTURE WHEN SPEAKING TO THE JEWS.

 *********

And this is what Bibi said at the CFR on Thursday.

He basically toed the line of "two states for two people", despite standing firm on settlement freeze. Time will tell; apparently a secret agreement was made between Bibi and Obama to not permit further construction anyway, but it was done via the back door, not in an official statement.

Netanyahu at CFR: Israel won't extend construction freeze; We've done enough,Let's get on with the talks"

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Thursday that Israel would not extend a construction moratorium in the West Bank past September and that he believed a peace agreement with the Palestinians could be reached within a year.

"I think we've done enough. Let's get on with the talks," he said, when asked in an appearance at the Council on Foreign Relations whether he would extend the limited freeze he put in place to coax the Palestinians into peace negotiations.

At the forum, Netanyahu repeated a call to the Palestinians to move from indirect talks that began in May under US mediation to face-to-face negotiations on statehood.

"I think we should seize the moment. And it is a challenging moment and an important moment. We have the ability to negotiate a peace," Netanyahu said at the international affairs think tank in New York.

"And I'm prepared to take risks," Netanyahu added, while stressing that would not entail any move that could jeopardize Israel's security.

"But we have to get on with it. We should just stop all the delays and start now, next week, in two weeks - get the talks going. Because only if we start them, we can complete them."

Netanyahu said he intended "to confound the skeptics and critics." But he added: "I need a partner."

"I'd like President Abbas to make, if not his Bar-Ilan speech, I'd like to hear the Bir Zeit speech in which he says these things very clearly. And I'd like to meet him and make peace"


The future of settlements, he said, would be addressed in the so-called final status talks with the Palestinians.

On the subject of Iran and its uranium enrichment program, which Israel regards as a grave threat, Netanyahu was supportive of recent Obama administration moves. "The statement that the president has made that all options are on the table is probably the most effective pressure that you could direct at Iran," Netanyahu said, addressing the possibility of using military force to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons. "They have in the past backed off when they thought the U.S. would act in a more forceful way."

Addressing recent strains in U.S.-Israel relations, Netanyahu emphasized Israel's strategic value to the United States. "In the heart of the Middle East, Israel is the source of the greatest stability," he said, "the service that Israel does in the Middle East is below the swirl of public debate, is real and much appreciated by the governments that are actually acting to stabilize the Middle East, chief among them the United States."

 ***************************

.... And THIS will be the result of Bibi's visit to Washington and New York; whether under duress or of his own free will , the result will be the same. As far as I know, if a Jew is faced with his own death, or murder of another Jew, he has to choose death. Not so Bibi....

...MORE DEAD JEWS....



Photo by: Associated Press

Goodwill moves likely upon PM’s return

By YAAKOV KATZ , Jerusalem Post
07/09/2010 04:36

Gestures may include releasing prisoners, security transfer to PA.

The Defense Ministry is drafting a comprehensive list of confidence-building measures that it anticipates it will be asked to implement after Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu returns to Israel on Friday from his meeting with US President Barack Obama, The Jerusalem Post has learned.

It has not been decided if the measures will be taken only following an announcement on the opening of direct negotiations with the Palestinian Authority, which Netanyahu has said will likely begin in the coming weeks, or will be initiated sooner, as part of an Israeli and American effort to get the PA to sit down at the negotiating table.

Gestures may include releasing prisoners, lifting roadblocks, security transfer to PA

The gestures under consideration include the release of Palestinian prisoners from Israeli jails, the lifting of IDF roadblocks in the West Bank and the transfer of security authority over Palestinian towns in the West Bank to PA security forces.

On Monday, Defense Minister Ehud Barak met with PA Prime Minister Salam Fayyad in Jerusalem, in the first high-level meeting between top officials from the sides in about a year.

A senior defense official said that Fayyad urged Barak to move forward with the confidence-building measures and to include an Israeli commitment not to deport Hamas legislators from Jerusalem.

Four Hamas-affiliated Palestinian Legislative Council members currently face expulsion from Jerusalem. One of them, Muhammad Abu Tir, is in police custody for refusing to leave the city in late June, shortly after he was released from jail after serving close to four years.

***********************

UPDATE:

And did you see this? Clearly foul play,  happening AFTER HIS VISIT TO THE UNITED NATIONS, AND AFTER THE PRESIDENTS' CONFERENCE. WHAT COULD BE A CLEARER MESSAGE? Please use translater in the sidebar for translation.

BIBI CAUGHT IN THE ELEVATOR WITH HIS WHOLE CREW AND HIS WIFE FOR HALF AN HOUR. He was sent through the service elevator. Remember, the ambient temperature was 105 degrees Fahrenheit the day before, and still very hot.


http://www.nrg.co.il/online/1/ART2/130/390.html

מתח בניו יורק: נתניהו ושרה נתקעו במעלית

המעלית ב"פלאזה" נתקעה כשבני הזוג נתניהו שהו בה. שרה: "ביבי נחלץ ממקומות מסובכים יותר". רה"מ: לחסוך במילים, צריך את החמצן"

מיה בנגל, וושינגטון | 9/7/2010 7:32

להיתקע במעלית בניו יורק זו יכולה להיות חוויה מלחיצה למדי. שלשום (ד') זה קרה לראש הממשלה בנימין נתניהו ולרעייתו, שרה. 

בני הזוג באווירה רגועה יותר צילום: עמוס בן גרשום, לע''מ

לאחר שראש הממשלה סיים את נאומו בפני חברי ועידת הנשיאים במלון פלאזה, מן המפוארים שבמלונות ניו יורק, הובילו אותו ואת רעייתו אנשי היחידה לאבטחת אישים למעלית צדדית, המשמשת כמעלית שירות. לאחר שכולם נכנסו לתוכה יצאה המעלית לדרכה ולאחר דקה נעצרה ונתקעה.

המאבטחים נלחצו שמא מדובר באיזושהי מזימה, אולם התאמצו לשמור על קור רוח. בשלב מסוים אמרה שרה בבדיחות דעת: "ביבי יודע להיחלץ ממקומות מסובכים יותר".

גורם שנתקע באותה מעלית סיפר כי נתניהו לא צחק, אלא שמר על ארשת פנים רצינית והאיץ במאבטחים לנסות ולפתור את הבעיה. המאבטחים השיבו: "אנחנו מחפשים דרך לצאת מפה".

"ראש הממשלה שמר על קור רוח"

נתניהו השיב, ספק בצחוק ספק ברצינות: "אתם לא מחפשים, אתם מוצאים. ובינתיים אני מציע לא להילחץ ולא להכביר במילים, אנחנו צריכים את החמצן".

רק לאחר כחצי שעה הצליחו המאבטחים, בסיוע קציני הביטחון של המלון, לשחרר את המעלית ולפתוח את דלת המתכת.

גורם דיפלומטי בכיר בניו יורק אישר את פרטי האירוע
וציין: "ראש הממשלה שמר על קור רוח", אולם לפי הגרסה הנפוצה יותר, דווקא שרה נתניהו שמרה על קור רוח וחוש הומור, בעוד שבעלה, יוצא סיירת מטכ"ל, דווקא נלחץ.

נתן אשל, ראש הסגל במשרד ראש הממשלה, ששהה גם הוא במעלית התקועה, אמר: "אילו היו בידי נתניהו כלי פריצה, הוא בוודאי היה מצליח לצאת מזה".

Thanks to E.

*************

And now the REAL results: amazing what a few threats on one's life can do:

 

Netanyahu hints at flexibility on Jerusalem

By Uriel Heilman · July 7, 2010

NEW YORK (JTA) -- It was an otherwise wholly unremarkable stump speech before a friendly audience in New York.

On Wednesday evening at Manhattan’s Plaza Hotel, the Israeli prime minister addressed a roomful of more than 300 Jews on

the subjects of Iran, his government’s eagerness for direct peace talks with the Palestinians and the swell meeting he had just

had with President Obama at the White House.

But then, in an off-the-cuff remark to a question on Jerusalem from the audience, Benjamin Netanyahu dropped a hint that his

government’s insistence on Israeli sovereignty over all of Jerusalem might not be ironclad.

“Everybody knows that there are Jewish neighborhoods in Jerusalem that under any peace plan will remain where they are,”

Netanyahu said in response to the question read by the executive vice chairman of the Conference of Presidents of Major

American Jewish Organizations, Malcolm Hoenlein.

The implication of Netanyahu’s remark -- that other neighborhoods of Jerusalem may not remain “where they are,” becoming

part of an eventual Palestinian state -- was the first hint that the Israeli leader may be flexible on the subject of Jerusalem. Until

now, Netanyahu has insisted that Jerusalem is not up for negotiation.

While the prime minister surely did not intend the gathering under the aegis of the Presidents Conference to serve as his forum

for opening up negotiations over Jerusalem, the impromptu remark before an audience of prominent New York Jews and a

handful of elected officials cast a slim ray of light on what Netanyahu thinks might be the Israeli capital’s ultimate fate.

It was significant as well because Netanyahu’s true intentions regarding the peace process remain largely opaque, the subject

of much debate from Washington to Ramallah. Netanyahu was a latecomer to the two-state position -- endorsing the idea of an

eventual Palestinian state only a year ago, after much prodding by the United States -- and the governing coalition he has

assembled is comprised largely of right-wing parties that do not believe in the current Palestinian Authority as a partner for

negotiations.

In public, President Obama declared Tuesday that he believes Netanyahu is genuinely committed to seeking a two-state

solution.

“I believe that Prime Minister Netanyahu wants peace. I think he’s willing to take risks for peace,” Obama told reporters following

his Oval Office meeting with Netanyahu. “And during our conversation, he once again reaffirmed his willingness to engage in

serious negotiations with the Palestinians around what I think should be the goal not just of the two principals involved but the

entire world, and that is two states living side by side in peace and security.”

Privately, however, some U.S. administration officials have expressed doubts about Netanyahu’s ability to make good on that

vision. Other Obama supporters have questioned Netanyahu's commitment to that goal, and the Palestinian Authority

leadership says Netanyahu’s interest in negotiations is not serious.

“Words, not deeds,” was the assessment of chief Palestinian negotiator Saeb Erekat, who dismissed Netanyahu’s lip service to

the peace process in an interview Tuesday with The New York Times. “We need to see deeds.”

Netanyahu insists he is serious about peace talks, and that it is the Palestinians who are playing games.

“You either put up excuses or you lead," the Israeli leader said in his New York speech. "I want to enter direct talks with the

Palestinian leadership now,”

“I think we can defy the skeptics,” he said, recalling the doubters that abounded when Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin

began talking to Egyptian President Anwar Sadat in the lead-up to the Camp David Accords, and when Richard Nixon visited

China. “This is a challenge I’m up to.”

Was it hyperbole or a sign of the legacy Netanyahu hopes for himself?

If Netanyahu is interested in following Begin and Nixon’s model, leading a conservative government to a historic rapprochement

with a longtime foe, eventually he will have to include Jerusalem in negotiations with the Palestinians; they won't sign a peace

deal without it. If not, Netanyahu is trying to pull the wool over the eyes of the skeptics.

“This is going to be a very, very tough negotiation, but I’m prepared to negotiate,” Netanyahu insisted Wednesday. “But I cannot

engage between someone who won’t sit at the table.”

Very truly yours,
Eli Kowalsky, Managing Member
KENSINGTON CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC
62 William St., 4th Floor
New York, NY 10005
212-825-9000 Voice; 212-825-9400 Fax; 917-407-4682 Mobile
www.kensingtoncp.com


Further Updates:

400 Rabbis to Bibi: they are saying exactly what I just said: BIBI, YOU HAVE TO STAY FIRM!

• Rabbis Show Letter from Sharon Promising Disengagement Gains

Av 4, 5770, 15 July 10 09:17

by Gil Ronen

(Israelnationalnews.com)

The Rabbinical Congress for Peace (RCP) marked the fifth anniversary of Israel's disastrous withdrawal from Gaza by publishing a letter the group received from then-Prime Minister Ariel Sharon dated July 18, 2005. The Rabbis had handed Sharon a Torah Ruling against ceding land but Sharon chose to ignore it. 

"I believe that today, the benefit, peace and security of the Nation of Israel require the evacuation of the Gaza Strip, an area in which there is no chance of establishing a Jewish majority and which everyone knows will not be part of the State of Israel in a permanent accord,” Sharon wrote.

“At the same time, we are transferring the brunt of our efforts to the most important areas for safeguarding our future: the Galilee, the Negev, Greater Jerusalem, the settlement blocs and the security zones.

“I initiated the Disengagement because it is the best vehicle for a basic change in the national situation of the Jewish people. The departure from Gaza will have a decisive positive influence on all fields of life in Israel: security, economy and the quality of life in the country.”

Along with the letter from Sharon, the RCP re-published the Torah Ruling signed by almost 400 rabbis forbidding surrender of any land to foreigners. “The Disengagement proved again that the Torah Ruling against relinquishing land to enemies because it will make it easier for them to conquer the land is valid today more than ever,” the rabbinical forum said.

The Rabbis expressed their “amazement” that Israel has established various inquiry committees on different issues but “has still not found time to set up an inquiry committee to investigate the heinous crime committed by the Israeli government of uprooting thousands of Jews from their homes through a Disengagement which led to hundreds of casualties and to the deterioration of Israel’s security to an all-time low.”

Flotilla is result of retreat“We hope that the Terkel Committee that is investigating Israel’s actions in trying to impose a Gaza Strip naval blockade will also investigate the genesis of what led to this situation,” said Rabbi Avrohom Shmuel Lewin, RCP Director-General. “The Committee must investigate what caused Israel to lose its deterrence. Turkey or any other country never dared to send provocative ships against Israel in the past.”

Rabbi Joseph Gerlitzky, Rabbi of Central Tel Aviv and Chairman of the RCP, said that for the past twenty years the RCP has corresponded with and met dozens of politicians and prime ministers and presented them with the Torah Ruling against giving up land to foreigners, an act which will only weaken and harm Israel’s security. Unfortunately, he added, the consequences predicted by the Halacha (Jewish Law) materialized against the opinions of all so-called “advisers, strategists and political analysts.”

“It did not take long before everyone saw Sharon’s colossal mistake,” the RCP stated. In his letter, the rabbis added, “He wrote that the Disengagement will bring peace and prosperity to the Negev, to greater Jerusalem, to the settlement blocs , and enhance Israel’s security, and we all saw the thousands of rockets that struck the Negev, we now see the threat facing greater Jerusalem and the continuous settlement freeze and the enormous concessions in Judea and Samaria  which were a direct result of the disengagement from Gaza (and the implementation of the Oslo accords), exactly as the Rabbis warned in their Ruling based on the Jewish Code of Law.” 

'The Torah screams'“Yet there are still those don’t learn from the past and  believe that if we further concede, further withdraw, and be more flexible to U.S. demands and find favor in the eyes of the world they will fight Iran for us. The government also thinks that by begging the Palestinians to negotiate it will gain world respect and succeed in preserving Israel’s basic security needs. 

“But the Torah does not change, the Rabbis stated, “it still screams and warns that any negotiations based on withdrawing from land under Israeli control will lead to incessant bloodshed and instability in the region.” 

The RCP expressed some satisfaction over a slight resumption of building in the outskirts of Jerusalem but said this is not enough and demanded massive construction in all parts of Israel.

Rabbi Moshe Havlin, Chief Rabbi of Kiryat Gat and vice-chairman of the RCP, called on Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu not to follow in the footsteps of Sharon. Rabbi Havlin warned that every day that Israel refrains from construction in Jerusalem or in Judea and Samaria displays another concession to pressure and just leads to additional demands and stronger pressure than before.

“Mr. Netanyahu, the majority of Americans lack faith in President Obama and he cannot force Israel to do anything if you say no. Mr. Obama is trying to make political gains at the expense of Israel’s security and if you stand firm without wavering, the pressure will stop,” Rabbi Havlin said.

However, Bibi , with his D.M. EHUD BARAK, is not listening to the rabbis, obviously; so now, compliments of Israel, thank you very much...

• Russia Supplying PA With 50 Armored Vehicles

Av 9, 5770, 20 July 10 04:58

(Israelnationalnews.com) Russia's Foreign Ministry said it has sent 50 armored vehicles to Jordan, for transfer to the Palestinian Authority. The vehicles will be moved over to the PA in coordination with Israel. The PA is receiving the vehicles for free. Russian army officers have already trained PA security personnel on how to use and maintain the vehicles. 

Apparently:

 ( according to SHmuel)

The Russians have been trying the same 50 APC deal for several years.  All previous governments scuttled that.

And Mordechai says:

"Thank you VERY VERY much for this heads-up; this item, taken together with the widespread attack training that we've been hearing for the past couple of days (I've checked with friends in your area as well as the rest of Yehuda/Shomron) - not only is the pattern the same everywhere, but so is the army's response; it's no longer "weddings", rather, now it's "they finished their Bagrut (senior final exams)" and are therefore shooting as an expression of unrestrained joy.  The pattern heard in the several locations I have checked is the same:  15 or 25 rounds, two minute rest, then again, continuing for one and a half to two and a half hours, mid-morning, early evening, and then again late night.  New armored vehicles together with the expenditure of ammunition that widespread training involves show a strategic commitment of resources to the first strike attack option, and are therefore key indicators of readiness for such an attack."


......And now this:

http://israeltruthtimes.blogspot.com/2010/08/didnt-i-repeatedly-tell-you-that-turkey.html