Disclaimer:
B"H
To all, Shalom.
Here is my latest interview on the Barry Chamish show. Honestly, I think it is worth listening to. However, please be warned of the following:
First of all, I never said or implied that NATO is controlling both sides of the conflict. That is the creator of the video's interpretation, not mine - not even Barry's, apparently. I said, the CFR, with other words, the NWO, ROME, is controlling both sides. NATO at this point is controlling the rebel side, they are siding with the Muslim brotherhood . The Vatican is on the side of Gaddhafi, and essentially claims to want peace in Libya, yet all the while supporting NATO fully; I think they are not happy to see Arabs die, what they want to see is JEWS die! Libya is testing ground. And of course NATO and the US want Libyan GOLD, Libyan OIL, etc.
Follow Ben Ami, you get to Shimon Peres and Rome.
Follow NATO, you get to Rome.
But NATO could play their opposition to Israel in this particular war, so if they want, they can expel Israel, and go to war against Israel, which is their ultimate goal, in my opinion.
So essentially ROME is playing both sides. Not NATO.
In addition, I made a couple of errors: for instance, Shlomo Ben-Ami is not the head of the Toledo Center for Peace, he is its vice-president.
I also erred slightly regarding the exact date of the disturbances in Benghazi. They actually started on February 15, but the planned "DAY OF RAGE" of the protestors took place on February 17, at which time it was countered by the killing of protesters by Gaddhafi's forces:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2011_Libyan_civil_war
Follow Ben Ami, you get to Shimon Peres and Rome.
Follow NATO, you get to Rome.
But NATO could play their opposition to Israel in this particular war, so if they want, they can expel Israel, and go to war against Israel, which is their ultimate goal, in my opinion.
So essentially ROME is playing both sides. Not NATO.
In addition, I made a couple of errors: for instance, Shlomo Ben-Ami is not the head of the Toledo Center for Peace, he is its vice-president.
I also erred slightly regarding the exact date of the disturbances in Benghazi. They actually started on February 15, but the planned "DAY OF RAGE" of the protestors took place on February 17, at which time it was countered by the killing of protesters by Gaddhafi's forces:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2011_Libyan_civil_war
I apologize for these errors.
There are four parts to this interview, this video is part I, the other three parts are linked below. May I suggest you listen to all of them.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N9H5AoIs3cY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b6be2QuVrwI
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8YTHoc3w1dE
See also:
That is exactly my thinking: Libya is a test case...
http://israeltruthtimes.blogspot.com/2011/04/who-is-really-behind-infamous-facebook.html
And here are some comments:
Eric Phelps writes:
You are right. Rome is playing both sides, not NATO---that Nazi vassal of the Pope.
Further, Gaddhafi is a papal Knight of Malta with massive financial holdings in Italy. Thus, Gaddhafi is pretending to really wage a war but he is really killing his own Berber people, ancient enemies of Rome since the days the Berbers occupied Spain (750-1492). In the end, all of North Africa will be in the hands of the Pope’s Muslim Brotherhood, established by the Order in Cairo, 1928 (same year the Order created Opus Dei in Spain). And the Muslim Brotherhood has a prominent Knight of Malta in its ranks.... Meanwhile, Rome delights in the killing of Arab descendants of Ishmael (Egyptians especially) as well as the Jews descending from Jacob
E.writes:
So
what's the hope? In the Talmud it says that separation between Rome and Germany is necessary to stop evil from spreading, perhps separating between Rome and NATO is the key- are our leaders that smart?
UPDATE:
Libyan Rebels Sold Hizbollah and Hamas Chemical Shells « Daily News
http://www.April 1, 2011
Senior Libyan rebel “officers” sold Hizballah and Hamas thousands of chemical shells from the stocks of mustard and nerve gas that fell into rebel hands when they overran Muammar Qaddafi’s military facilities in and around Benghazi, debkafile’s exclusive military and intelligence sources report.
Word of the capture touched off a scramble in Tehran and among the terrorist groups it sponsors to get hold of their first unconventional weapons.
According to our sources, the rebels offloaded at least 2,000 artillery shells carrying mustard gas and 1,200 nerve gas shells for cash payment amounting to several million dollars.
US and Israeli intelligence agencies have tracked the WMD consignments from eastern Libya as far as Sudan in convoys secured by Iranian agents and Hizballah and Hamas guards. They are not believed to have reached their destinations in Lebanon and the Gaza Strip, apparently waiting for an opportunity to get their deadly freights through without the US or Israel attacking and destroying them.
It is also not clear whether the shells and gases were assembled upon delivery or were travelling in separate containers. Our sources report that some of the poison gas may be intended not only for artillery use but also for drones which Hizballah recently acquired from Iran.
Tehran threw its support behind the anti-Qaddafi rebels because of this unique opportunity to get hold of the Libyan ruler’s stock of poison gas after it fell into opposition hands and arm Hizballah and Hamas with unconventional weapons without Iran being implicated in the transaction.
Shortly after the uprising began in the third week of February, a secret Iranian delegation arrived in Benghazi. Its members met rebel chiefs, some of them deserters from the Libyan army, and clinched the deal for purchasing the entire stock of poison gas stock and the price.
The rebels threw in a quantity of various types of anti-air missiles.
Hizballah and Hamas purchasing missions arrived in the first week of March to finalize the deal and arrange the means of delivery.
The first authoritative American source to refer to a Hizballah presence in Benghazi was the commander of US NATO forces Adm. James Stavridis. When he addressed a US Senate committee on Tuesday, March 29, he spoke of “telltale signs of the presence of Islamic insurgents led by Al-Qaeda and Hizballah” on the rebel side of the Libyan war. He did not disclose what they were doing there.
I don't know if Whatdoesitmean reports can be believed, but apparently Russian Foreign Minister Serduykov agrees with me ( unsubstantiated, did not find any other source for this report)
ReplyDelete"....Minister Serdyukov further states in his report that China’s actions to protect its energy future based upon Middle East oil (of which it could not survive without) is its belief that the United States is about turn against Israel using the same type of United Nations maneuvering it used to launch attacks on Libya...."