Bibi and the true believers
August 2, 2013, 10:20 AM
Standing
next to US Secretary of State John Kerry on Tuesday morning, Justice
Minister Tzipi Livni gushed that through his indefatigable efforts to
bring Israeli and Palestinian officials to Washington, Kerry proved that
"nothing can stop true believers."
As usual,
the cognitively challenged Livni told us something she hadn't intended
to say. The term "true believer" was coined by Eric Hoffer in his
classic work The True Believer from 1951, which Livni has
obviously not read. Hoffer's epic study of the psychological roots of
fanaticism described a true believer as a person so fanatically
committed to a cause that no amount of reality can make him abandon it.
And that just about sums up Kerry, and the man he works for, US President Barack Obama.
Kerry
visited Israel six times in the four months leading up to the meetings
in Washington this week, during which Americans, Palestinians and
Israelis discussed the size of the table they will be sitting around in
the coming discussions.
During the same four
months, the Syrian regime used chemical weapons against its opponents on
multiple occasions. Most recently, they gassed Palestinians in Yarmuk
refugee camp outside Damascus, killing 22 people.
During those four months, al-Qaida strengthened its control over the Syrian opposition groups fighting the regime.
During
those four months, the Syrian civil war became a focal point of a wider
Sunni-Shi'ite religious war that has already spread to Lebanon and
Iraq. In its post-US-withdrawal role of Iranian satrapy, Iraq has
allowed Iran to use its territory and airspace to transfer war materiel
to the Syrian regime.
During those four months,
the Obama administration decided to begin arming the al-Qaidadominated
rebel forces. It has also deliberately raised the risk of a
Syrian-Israeli war by informing the media every time that Israel attacks
missile sites in Syria.
Also during the four
months that Kerry obsessed over convincing PLO chief Mahmoud Abbas to
send his representative to Washington, Egypt experienced its second
revolution in which, buffeted by millions of demonstrators who filled
the squares of Egypt's cities, the Egyptian military overthrew the
US-supported Muslim Brotherhood regime.
The
Obama administration was quick to jump onto the bandwagon of the first
Egyptian revolution in January 2011. That revolution led to the
military's ouster of then-president Hosni Mubarak, a staunch US ally,
and so paved the way for the totalitarian and deeply popular Muslim
Brotherhood to rise to power.
When the
Brotherhood became subject to its own revolution due to its incompetent
handling of Egypt's failed economy and its single-minded focus on
transforming Egypt into an Islamist state as quickly as possible, the
Obama administration was confounded. Speaking to The Wall Street Journal
this week, a senior administration official expressed complete
befuddlement at events in Egypt. "None of us can quite figure this out,"
the official said. "It seems so self-defeating."
And
that is the thing of it. In its support for the Brotherhood, the
administration was implementing its wholly unfounded, dead-wrong
ideological belief that the Muslim Brotherhood is a progressive,
"largely secular" organization that is dedicated to good works. And now
that the Egyptian military, supported by about half of the Egyptian
people, has rejected the Brotherhood, its actions are incomprehensible
to the Obama administration.
In the face of
massive documentary evidence, and facts on the ground, (Egypt has run
out of food, and rather than get them some, overthrown president Mohamed
Morsi rammed through a totalitarian Islamist constitution), the Obama
administration still clings to its ideological belief that the Muslim
Brotherhood is a positive, progressive, "largely secular" organization
that is devoted to good works for the poor.
So,
too, in Syria. The administration thinks it is okay to fund the Free
Syria Army, because its leadership is dominated by the Muslim
Brotherhood.
Owing to the administration's
blind faith in its belief that the reason that the US is hated in the
Muslim world is because it has opposed populist Islamist forces, Obama
and his advisers think it makes sense to arm those forces in Syria now -
so long as the Muslim Brotherhood is able to hide the fact that it is
dominated by al-Qaida for a sufficient number of news cycles to sell
this fiction to the media.
The administration's
faith in Islamist reasonableness holds for the Shi'ite Islamists just
as strongly as it does for the Sunni Islamists. This is why it maintains
its commitment to negotiating with Iran's fanatical regime about its
nuclear weapons program, despite overwhelming evidence that the Iranians
are using the negotiations as a means to develop their bomb in peace.
This
week David Albright and Christina Walrond at the Institute for Science
and International Security in Washington published a deeply disturbing
report. They explained that based on what we know, Iran will reached
"critical capacity" in its nuclear program by mid-2014. Albright and
Walrond defined critical capacity as "the technical capability to
produce sufficient weapongrade uranium from its safeguarded stocks of
low enriched uranium for a nuclear explosive, without being detected."
Albright
and Walrond then explained the many ways Iran can speed up the process,
and hide its achievement from the international community for long
enough to make it too late to conduct military strikes on their nuclear
facilities to prevent Iran from becoming a nuclear power.
In
other words, they told us politely, and diplomatically, if urgently,
that we have arrived at the moment of decision. Will the US or Israel
strike Iran's nuclear installations to prevent it from becoming a
nuclear power, or will Iran become a nuclear power? If we wait much
longer, we won't have sufficient time to act.
But
for Kerry and his fellow true believers the most urgent priority was to
convince the Palestinians to sit in the same room as Israelis. And this
week they scored a great victory for US foreign policy by achieving
their goal.
In her brief remarks, not only did Livni inadvertently tell us that Kerry is a fanatic. She also told us that she is a fanatic.
Livni
said, "[I]t took more than just a plane ticket to be here today. A
courageous act of leadership by Prime Minister Netanyahu that was
approved by the Israeli government made this visit here and the
beginning of the negotiation possible."
The
"courageous act" she referred to was the government's decision to
release 104 "Palestinian prisoners" from Israel's prisons. The demand
for their freedom was the obstacle Abbas placed in the way of Livni
acquiring her long-sought-after plane ticket to peace talks and five
star receptions at Kerry's Washington mansion.
The
104 "prisoners" are made up of Palestinians and Israeli Arabs. They are
not car thieves or pickpockets. They are monsters with human faces. All
104 are serving life sentences for murder or attempted murder. Their
crimes were gruesome acts of barbarism marked by demonic cruelty.
Yusef
Said al-Al and Ayman Taleb Abu Sitteh stabbed David Bubil and Haim
Weitzman to death and mutilated their bodies, cutting off their ears as
souvenirs.
Three other "Palestinian prisoners" hacked four teenagers to pieces, killing them with pitchforks, hatchets and knives.
Thirteen-year-old Oren Baharmi was raped and murdered by Amad Mahmad Jamil Shehada.
And the list goes on and on, and on.
There was nothing even vaguely courageous about Netanyahu's decision to release these monsters.
There
was nothing even vaguely courageous about his cabinet members' decision
to vote for their release. Theirs was an act of utter cravenness. They
dishonored the victims, the victims' families and the nation as a whole.
And
they endangered the country. According to the Almagor Victims of Terror
organization, from 2000 to 2005, 180 Israelis were murdered by
Palestinian terrorists released by Israel in previous "deals." And those
terrorists had been imprisoned for non-lethal actions, (i.e., without
blood on their hands).
The fact that Netanyahu
and his ministers passed this decision simply to provide a sufficient
payoff to Abbas for him to send Saeb Erekat to Washington to talk about
nothing with Livni, makes their actions, not only craven, but insane.
Livni's
obscene characterization of this cowardly, life-threatening injustice
as a "courageous act," exposes her as well as a true believing fanatic.
Only a fanatic could say such a thing.
In
his remarks, Kerry said that the talks about the size of the table are
going to bring about a situation where Israel will achieve, "not just
the absence of conflict, but a full and lasting peace with the Arab and
Muslim nations."
Like Kerry's demand that
Israel free the terrorists, this statement bespeaks an underlying
fanatical dementia. Regarding the "Arab and Muslim nations," in Syria,
neither the al-Qaida forces nor the regime have mentioned anything about
putting down their weapons if Israel coughs up Jerusalem and Elon
Moreh. The same goes for Hezbollah, Iran and their friends and enemies
warring for power throughout the region.
As for
the Palestinians, if they were interested in "lasting peace" with
Israel, they wouldn't demand freedom for terrorist murderers. Moreover,
while Kerry was exulting in his brilliant success, Abbas announced that
in his version of "lasting peace," Jews will be wiped off of the map of
Palestine.
As Abbas put it, "In a final
resolution, we would not see the presence of a single Israeli - civilian
or soldiers - on our lands."
So again, while
Kerry and Livni see rainbows and unicorns, Abbas sees a Jew-free
Palestine, with the 600,000 Jews of Jerusalem, Judea and Samaria
rendered homeless refugees to make room for his anti-Semitic fiefdom.
It
is not surprising that Kerry, Obama and Livni are going along with this
obscenity. It is not surprising that fanatics who pray to the god of
the two-state solution think it is courageous to free Jewish-baby
killers. It is not surprising they think the most important thing on the
international agenda is to secure Israel's surrender of land, our legal
rights, and our ability to defend ourselves to a terrorist group that
hates Jews so much it requires all of us to be gone before it will do us
the favor of accepting sovereignty.
What is
surprising - and frightening - is that Netanyahu, who is not a true
believer, and knows that they are true believers, is going along with
this.
Netanyahu knows that Israel cannot
survive without Judea and Samaria. He knows what the Muslim Brotherhood
is. He knows the nature of the Iranian regime. He knows that the PLO is
no different from Hamas. Their goal is the same - they want to destroy
Israel.
Netanyahu knows that Obama is hostile to Israel and that he will not lift a finger to block Iran from becoming a nuclear power.
So
why is he going along with their insanity? In bowing to US pressure and
approving the release of 104 terrorist murderers from prison, Netanyahu
behaved like a coward. In bowing to US pressure not to bomb Iran's
nuclear installations, Netanyahu is being a coward.
The most important question for Israel today then is whether our leader is capable of being anything else.
Originally published in The Jerusalem Post.
Maybe Netanyahu was so threatened, as Aaron Klein reports, that he is using the negotiations as a stalling tactic to figure how to disrupt all their efforts? A too early bold action would only bring on greater threats.
ReplyDeleteJust a thought, not what one wants to hear but a very human reaction.
OR MAYBE, he will bolt Likid altogether, and create a new party of 'traitors' to give away parts of our holy Land?