Now see this report ( to be taken with a "grain" of salt, considering the source):
- Acts of God, or Acts of man?
(The U.S., as well as other countries, know how to modify weather, according to the videos you have just watched).
(The U.S., as well as other countries, know how to modify weather, according to the videos you have just watched).
February 6, 2011
New Superstorms Warned Have ‘Doomed’ World Food Production
   |
A Superstorm is an extremely large and powerful storm that forms when conditions of the atmosphere are right to support a storm of its magnitude. This usually happens when two or more storm systems merge, then are strengthened by a jet stream. One of the most famous Superstorms occurred over North America in 1993 and was called “The Storm of the Century”.
During the past few months, however, and as we had previously detailed in our January 19th report “Greenland Sunrise Shocks World As Superstorms Pound Planet”, these Superstorms are now occurring on a near weekly basis, instead of once-a-century as had been their historic norm.
The reasons lying behind the sudden formation of these Superstorms we had, likewise, reported on in our January 7th report “Pole Shift Blamed For Russian Air Disaster, Closure Of US Airport”, and wherein we warned of our world’s scientists fears of a giant “stealth” planet believed by many of them is soon to wreck total havoc upon our planet.
Of the Superstorm that pounded America [photo 2nd left] this past week we can read as reported NASA: “In a winter marked by several crippling storms, the storm of February 1–2, 2011, stands out. Heavy snow, ice, freezing rain, and frigid wind battered about two thirds of the United States, making it “a winter storm of historic proportions,” said the National Weather Service.”
Of the Superstorm that pounded Australia [photo 3rd left] this past week we can further read as reported by the Associated Press News Service: “The tail end of one of Australia's largest-ever cyclones was felt at the other end of the country Saturday, as wild storms lashed Melbourne with destructive winds and flash flooding. Many parts of Australia have suffered a summer of awful weather, including pounding rains across northeastern Queensland state that caused the nation's worst flooding in decades, killing 35 people and causing an estimated $5.6 billion damage.”
Taken by themselves, this report says, the damage done by these Superstorms to the crops of North America and Australia do pose “significant”, but not “catastrophic” damage to our world’s ability to feed itself this year.
However, this report continues, when the damage caused by these Superstorms is combined with the cataclysmic destruction of over one-third of Russia’s crops due to historic fires and drought, the historic drought in China that is now being warned could cripple their entire winter wheat crop, the Superstorms that have pounded Southern Africa leaving their agricultural sector in ruins, the Superstorms that have virtually destroyed Sri Lanka’s ability to feed itself, the Superstorm that killed over 2,000 in Pakistan and destroyed its agriculture sector, historic fires and drought in Ukraine that destroyed 20% of their crops, the record cold and snow hitting a European Continent after their worst flooding in decades, catastrophic Superstorms hitting Brazil that has left nearly 700 dead, and a catastrophic drought in Argentina….to all of these, and more, the damage done in the past 12 months to our world’s ability to feed its 6.8 billion human beings has been “completely destroyed”.
So dire has the situation become, especially after world food prices hit a record never before seen this past month, Josette Sheeran, the UN World Food Programme's executive director, warned that “If people don't have enough to eat they only have three options: they can revolt, they can migrate or they can die.”
Even more ominous is this past week’s chart of Baltic Dry Index (BDI) [photo bottom left] showing our world’s shipping has dropped to its lowest level since the Great Economic Collapse of November 2008 and signaling a hoarding of grain and food supplies by producer nations that is putting exporting countries at risk of collapse as food riots increase this year across the globe.
Britain’s Telegraph News Service also reported this past week that authoritarian governments across the world are aggressively stockpiling food in order to stop the rapid rise of riots threatening their regimes, but according to this report is “too little, too late” as our world had been previously warned was just “one poor harvest away from total chaos”.
Important to note, this report continues, is that the United States, one of the world’s largest food exporting nations, has had its entire beef industry nearly crippled as its cattle herd population has shrunk to a level not seen since 1953 as their farmers are no longer able to afford to buy feed stocks.
Shockingly, though, the American’s response to the growing global food crisis was to approve this past week the planting of genetically modified alfalfa under pressure from Obama’s White House, and whose top Presidential aide, David Axelrod, urged his fellow Obaminites to “plow forward” on the US plan to plant this most destructive of monster crops despite the objections of scientists who have warned it will destroy their nations organic food industry.
As global wheat prices rose 47%, corn more than 50% and US soybeans 34% this past year alone, Russia warns “the worst is yet come”, one can only hope that those who listen will prepare.
http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index1445.htm
Comments:
Ron writes:
One can’t help wondering if Australia’s failure to be affected by the credit crisis is the reason for the killer storms that have damaged their economy.
Have attached a couple of docs that you may not have seen? A Treaty to stop others developing weather weapons would be very useful if you had the technology yourself.
Ron, you are absolutely right. The more I think of it, the more it seems logical that the NWO might have deliberately created these monster storms, specially considering they are able to do so. After all, isn't their goal depopulation - see below -? What better way to depopulate the world than by starvation? From the article above you can see the effect the recent megastorms are having on the world's food supply. Putting two and two together....Yet, so far no proof of their guilt. Maybe somebody with more information will come forward.
Update:
SHmuel made an important comment:
Humans, mortals can arguably create conditions leading to slight weather changes, temporary at that. We do not have the required rights or know how to do anything else.
Creating hurricanes is a bit of a claim... is it not?
I would agree on that we can possibly modify some conditions a bit, but certainly not fabricate major weather systems.
EXAMPLE
Surely you recall the Ozone layer problem.
I hold Patent No. 5,288,332 that to a great extent eliminated the use of Freon TM DuPont in most electronic applications.
When certain major companies decide or are forced to act, they have formidable Engineering depth to rely upon. They can, if the want, get the job done. They possess huge systems and research teams.
They lack the stupid charlatans that one finds concentrated mainly around the media or political trash.
I found the solution part of the Patent and basically developed it at the Engineering Laboratory I was in charge.
Then due to the immense work involved I was assigned a support Team.
Corporate assigned the Patent Division to the Patent processing. Drafting of course atmospheric / weather research experts.
What did that Engineering Team conclude?
We concluded based on proven information as follows:
A: Humans are able to harm the environment. And also possess sufficient knowledge to return it to its original design.
B: Humans can't CHANGE a THING outside the natural control limits. That is, we certainly cannot create new weather. We could slightly modify some parameters but not create new systems. This is the main conclusion of the Engineering Excellence Team that is the Central Corporate 24 Senior Fellow Engineers operations structure.
C: Humans cannot yet and for the foreseeable future permanently change weather systems.
D: Humans could cause a long process leading to our own destruction, upon which the original natural systems would cycle back.
Now let me visit the so called CO2 caused "grobarrr warrrming"... brrrr. It is darned cold...
THE OZONE DEPLETION SAGA and FREON TM.
We studied CO2 is depth due to the fact that my Patent is very much related to that molecule. I doubt there is more knowledge in that respect than the know how accumulated during the research in question. Much of it is still privileged information.
CO2 favored the advent of certain conditions that could at that time be remedied by the use of FREON, TM, a low boiling temperature solvent including very active chlorine.
CO2 was the chemical bed upon which intermetalic, (organics and metals such as CU, Pb, etc, combinations), paths
But much as it was and is natural for CO2 to exist and it being key part of the life support system, I conceived the idea of drafting CO2 into "PREVENTING" the development of intermetalics. Just as a tree or vegetation in general uses CO2 I proposed to also use it. The rest is part of the Patent so we will stop at this point. I developed the correct formulations to do that and they proved to be precise.
I suggest hat rather than solely attack CO2 sources, thus seriously harming other processes, the people need to adjust certain fuel based processes and certainly make USE of the extra CO2, as we did.
Rather than cutting down forests, plant more, far more.
Harvest Sun energy.
Reduce dependence on OIL. This started already but there is long way to go.
Etc.
We can go into this in far more detail but right now I am busy with other projects.
- The Military's Pandora's Box
This article was prepared to provide a summary of the contents of a book
written in 1995 which describes an entirely new class of weapons. The
weapons and their effects are described in the following pages. The United
States Navy and Air Force have joined with the University of Alaska, Fairbanks,
to build a prototype for a ground based "Star Wars" weapon system located in
the remote bush country of Alaska.
The individuals who are demanding answers about HAARP are scattered
around the planet. As well as bush dwellers in Alaska, they include: a physician
in Finland; a scientist in Holland; an anti-nuclear protester in Australia;
independent physicists in the United States; a grandmother in Canada, and
countless others.
Unlike the protests of the 1960s the objections to HAARP have been registered
using the tools of the 1990s. From the Internet, fax machines, syndicated talk
radio and a number of alternative print mediums the word is getting out and
people are waking up to this new intrusion by an over zealous United States
government.
The research team put together to gather the materials which eventually found
their way into the book never held a formal meeting, never formed a formal
organization. Each person acted like a node on a planetary info-spirit-net with
one goal held by all -- to keep this controversial new science in the public eye.
The result of the team's effort was a book which describes the science and the
political ramifications of this technology.
That book, Angels Don't Play this HAARP: Advances in Tesla Technology, has
230 pages. This article will only give the highlights. Despite the amount of
research (350 footnoted sources), at its heart it is a story about ordinary people
who took on an extraordinary challenge in bringing their research forward.
HAARP Boils the Upper Atmosphere
HAARP will zap the upper atmosphere with a focused and steerable
electromagnetic beam. It is an advanced model of an "ionospheric heater."
(The ionosphere is the electrically-charged sphere surrounding Earth's upper
atmosphere. It ranges between 40 to 60 miles above the surface of the Earth.)
Put simply, the apparatus for HAARP is a reversal of a radio telescope; antenna
send out signals instead of receiving. HAARP is the test run for a superpowerful
radiowave-beaming technology that lifts areas of the ionosphere by
focusing a beam and heating those areas. Electromagnetic waves then bounce
back onto earth and penetrate everything -- living and dead.
HAARP publicity gives the impression that the High-frequency Active Auroral
Research Program is mainly an academic project with the goal of changing the
ionosphere to improve communications for our own good. However, other U.S.
military documents put it more clearly -- HAARP aims to learn how to "exploit
the ionosphere for Department of Defense purposes." Communicating with
submarines is only one of those purposes.
Press releases and other information from the military on HAARP continually
downplay what it could do. Publicity documents insist that the HAARP project
is no different than other ionospheric heaters operating safely throughout the
world in places such as Arecibo, Puerto Rico, Tromso, Norway, and the former
Soviet Union. However, a 1990 government document indicates that the radiofrequency
(RF) power zap will drive the ionosphere to unnatural activities.
" ... at the highest HF powers available in the West, the instabilities commonly
studied are approaching their maximum RF energy dissipative capability,
beyond which the plasma processes will 'runaway' until the next limiting factor
is reached."
If the military, in cooperation with the University of Alaska Fairbanks, can show
that this new ground-based "Star Wars" technology is sound, they both win.
The military has a relatively-inexpensive defense shield and the University can
brag about the most dramatic geophysical manipulation since atmospheric
explosions of nuclear bombs. After successful testing, they would have the
military megaprojects of the future and huge markets for Alaska's North Slope
natural gas.
Looking at the other patents which built on the work of a Texas' physicist
named Bernard Eastlund, it becomes clearer how the military intends to use
the HAARP transmitter. It also makes governmental denials less believable.
The military knows how it intends to use this technology, and has made it clear
in their documents. The military has deliberately misled the public, through
sophisticated word games, deceit and outright disinformation.
The military says the HAARP system could:
· Give the military a tool to replace the electromagnetic pulse effect of
atmospheric thermonuclear devices (still considered a viable option by
the military through at least 1986)
· Replace the huge Extremely Low Frequency (ELF) submarine
communication system operating in Michigan and Wisconsin with a new
and more compact technology
· Be used to replace the over-the-horizon radar system that was once
planned for the current location of HAARP, with a more flexible and
accurate system
· Provide a way to wipe out communications over an extremely large area,
while keeping the military's own communications systems working
· Provide a wide area earth-penetrating tomography which, if combined
with the computing abilities of EMASS and Cray computers, would make
it possible to verify many parts of nuclear nonproliferation and peace
agreements
· Be a tool for geophysical probing to find oil, gas and mineral deposits
over a large area
· Be used to detect incoming low-level planes and cruise missiles, making
other technologies obsolete
The above abilities seem like a good idea to all who believe in sound national
defense, and to those concerned about cost-cutting. However, the possible
uses which the HAARP records do not explain, and which can only be found in
Air Force, Army, Navy and other federal agency records, are alarming.
Moreover, effects from the reckless use of these power levels in our natural
shield -- the ionosphere -- could be cataclysmic according to some scientists.
Two Alaskans put it bluntly. A founder of the NO HAARP movement, Clare
Zickuhr, says "The military is going to give the ionosphere a big kick and see
what happens."
The military failed to tell the public that they do not know what exactly will
happen, but a Penn State science article brags about that uncertainty. Macho
science? The HAARP project uses the largest energy levels yet played with by
what Begich and Manning call "the big boys with their new toys." HAARP is an
experiment in the sky, and experiments are done to find out something not
already known. Independent scientists told Begich and Manning that a HAARPtype
"skybuster" with its unforeseen effects could be an act of global
vandalism.
HAARP History
The patents described below were the package of ideas which were originally
controlled by ARCO Power Technologies Incorporated (APTI), a subsidiary of
Atlantic Richfield Company, one of the biggest oil companies in the world. APTI
was the contractor that built the HAARP facility. ARCO sold this subsidiary, the
patents and the second phase construction contract to E-Systems in June
1994.
E-Systems is one of the biggest intelligence contractors in the world -- doing
work for the CIA, defense intelligence organizations and others. $1.8 billion of
their annual sales are to these organizations, with $800 million for black
projects -- projects so secret that even the United States Congress isn't told
how the money is being spent.
E-Systems was bought out by Raytheon, which is one of the largest defense
contractors in the world. In 1994 Raytheon was listed as number forty-two on
the Fortune 500 list of companies. Raytheon has thousands of patents, some of
which will be valuable in the HAARP project. The twelve patents below are the
backbone of the HAARP project, and are now buried among the thousands of
others held in the name of Raytheon. Bernard J. Eastlund's U.S. Patent #
4,686,605, "Method and Apparatus for Altering a Region in the Earth's
Atmosphere, Ionosphere; and/or Magnetosphere," was sealed for a year under
a government Secrecy Order.
The Eastlund ionospheric heater was different; the radio frequency (RF)
radiation was concentrated and focused to a point in the ionosphere. This
difference throws an unprecedented amount of energy into the ionosphere. The
Eastlund device would allow a concentration of one watt per cubic centimeter,
compared to others only able to deliver about one millionth of one watt.
This huge difference could lift and change the ionosphere in the ways
necessary to create futuristic effects described in the patent. According to the
patent, the work of Nikola Tesla in the early 1900's formed the basis of the
research.
What would this technology be worth to ARCO, the owner of the patents? They
could make enormous profits by beaming electrical power from a powerhouse
in the gas fields to the consumer without wires.
For a time, HAARP researchers could not prove that this was one of the
intended uses for HAARP. In April, 1995, however, Begich found other patents,
connected with a "key personnel" list for APTI. Some of these new APTI
patents were indeed a wireless system for sending electrical power. Eastlund's
patent said the technology can confuse or completely disrupt airplanes' and
missiles' sophisticated guidance systems. Further, this ability to spray large
areas of Earth with electromagnetic waves of varying frequencies, and to
control changes in those waves, makes it possible to knock out
communications on land or sea as well as in the air.
The patent said:
"Thus, this invention provides the ability to put unprecedented amounts of
power in the Earth's atmosphere at strategic locations and to maintain the
power injection level particularly if random pulsing is employed, in a manner
far more precise and better controlled than heretofore accomplished by the
prior art, particularly by detonation of nuclear devices of various yields at
various altitudes... "
"...it is possible not only to interfere with third party communications but to
take advantage of one or more such beams to carry out a communications
network even though the rest of the world's communications are disrupted. Put
another way, what is used to disrupt another's communications can be
employed by one knowledgeable of this invention as a communication network
at the same time."
"... large regions of the atmosphere could be lifted to an unexpectedly high
altitude so that missiles encounter unexpected and unplanned drag forces with
resultant destruction."
"Weather modification is possible by, for example, altering upper atmosphere
wind patterns by constructing one or more plumes of atmospheric particles
which will act as a lens or focusing device.
... molecular modifications of the atmosphere can take place so that positive
environmental effects can be achieved. Besides actually changing the
molecular composition of an atmospheric region, a particular molecule or
molecules can be chosen for increased presence. For example, ozone,
nitrogen, etc., concentrations in the atmosphere could be artificially
increased."
Begich found eleven other APTI Patents. They told how to make "Nuclear-sized
Explosions without Radiation," Power-beaming systems, over-the-horizon
radar, detection systems for missiles carrying nuclear warheads,
electromagnetic pulses previously produced by thermonuclear weapons and
other Star-Wars tricks. This cluster of patents underlay the HAARP weapon
system.
Related research by Begich and Manning uncovered bizarre schemes. For
example, Air Force documents revealed that a system had been developed for
manipulating and disturbing human mental processes through pulsed radiofrequency
radiation (the stuff of HAARP) over large geographical areas. The
most telling material about this technology came from writings of Zbigniew
Brzezinski (former National Security Advisory to U.S. President Carter) and J.F.
MacDonald (science advisor to U.S. President Johnson and a professor of
Geophysics at UCLA), as they wrote about use of power-beaming transmitters
for geophysical and environmental warfare. The documents showed how these
effects might be caused, and the negative effects on human heath and
thinking.
The mental-disruption possibilities for HAARP are the most disturbing. More
than 40 pages of the book, with dozens of footnotes, chronicle the work of
Harvard professors, military planners and scientists as they plan and test this
use of the electromagnetic technology. For example, one of the papers
describing this use was from the International Red Cross in Geneva. It even
gave the frequency ranges where these effects could occur -- the same ranges
which HAARP is capable of broadcasting.
The following statement was made more than twenty-five years ago in a book
by Brzezinski which he wrote while a professor at Columbia University:
"Political strategists are tempted to exploit research on the brain and human
behavior. Geophysicist Gordon J.F. MacDonald, a specialist in problems of
warfare, says accurately-timed, artificially-excited electronic strokes could lead
to a pattern of oscillations that produce relatively high power levels over
certain regions of the earth ... in this way one could develop a system that
would seriously impair the brain performance of very large populations in
selected regions over an extended period"
" ... no matter how deeply disturbing the thought of using the environment to
manipulate behavior for national advantages, to some, the technology
permitting such use will very probably develop within the next few decades."
In 1966, MacDonald was a member of the President's Science Advisory
Committee and later a member of the President's Council on Environmental
Quality. He published papers on the use of environmental control technologies
for military purposes. The most profound comment he made as a geophysicist
was, "the key to geophysical warfare is the identification of environmental
instabilities to which the addition of a small amount of energy would release
vastly greater amounts of energy." While yesterday's geophysicists predicted
today's advances, are HAARP program managers delivering on the vision?
The geophysicists recognized that adding energy to the environmental soup
could have large effects. However, humankind has already added substantial
amounts of electromagnetic energy into our environment without
understanding what might constitute critical mass. The book by Begich and
Manning raises questions:
· Have these additions been without effect, or is there a cumulative
amount beyond which irreparable damage can be done?
· Is HAARP another step in a journey from which we cannot turn back?
· Are we about to embark on another energy experiment which unleashes
another set of demons from Pandora's box?
As early as 1970, Zbigniew Brzezinski predicted a "more controlled and
directed society" would gradually appear, linked to technology. This society
would be dominated by an elite group which impresses voters by allegedly
superior scientific know-how. Angels Don't Play This HAARP further quotes
Brzezinski:
"Unhindered by the restraints of traditional liberal values, this elite would not
hesitate to achieve its political ends by using the latest modern techniques for
influencing public behavior and keeping society under close surveillance and
control. Technical and scientific momentum would then feed on the situation it
exploits," Brzezinski predicted.
His forecasts proved accurate. Today, a number of new tools for the "elite" are
emerging, and the temptation to use them increases steadily. The policies to
permit the tools to be used are already in place. How could the United States
be changed, bit by bit, into the predicted highly-controlled technosociety?
Among the "steppingstones" Brzezinski expected were persisting social crises
and use of the mass media to gain the public's confidence.
In another document prepared by the government, the U.S. Air Force claims:
"The potential applications of artificial electromagnetic fields are wide-ranging
and can be used in many military or quasi-military situations... Some of these
potential uses include dealing with terrorist groups, crowd control, controlling
breaches of security at military installations, and antipersonnel techniques in
tactical warfare. In all of these cases the EM (electromagnetic) systems would
be used to produce mild to severe physiological disruption or perceptual
distortion or disorientation. In addition, the ability of individuals to function
could be degraded to such a point that they would be combat ineffective.
Another advantage of electromagnetic systems is that they can provide
coverage over large areas with a single system. They are silent and
countermeasures to them may be difficult to develop... One last area where
electromagnetic radiation may prove of some value is in enhancing abilities of
individuals for anomalous phenomena."
Do these comments point to uses already somewhat developed? The author of
the government report refers to an earlier Air Force document about the uses
of radio frequency radiation in combat situations. (Here Begich and Manning
note that HAARP is the most versatile and the largest radio-frequency-radiation
transmitter in the world.)
The United States Congressional record deals with the use of HAARP for
penetrating the earth with signals bounced off of the ionosphere. These signals
are used to look inside the planet to a depth of many kilometers in order to
locate underground munitions, minerals and tunnels. The U.S. Senate set aside
$15 million dollars in 1996 to develop this ability alone -- earth-penetratingtomography.
The problem is that the frequency needed for earth-penetrating
radiation is within the frequency range most cited for disruption of human
mental functions. It may also have profound effects on migration patterns of
fish and wild animals which rely on an undisturbed energy field to find their
routes.
As if electromagnetic pulses in the sky and mental disruption were not enough,
T. Eastlund bragged that the super-powerful ionospheric heater could control
weather.
Begich and Manning brought to light government documents indicating that
the military has weather-control technology. When HAARP is eventually built to
its full power level, it could create weather effects over entire hemispheres. If
one government experiments with the world's weather patterns, what is done
in one place will impact everyone else on the planet. Angels Don't Play This
HAARP explains a principle behind some of Nikola Tesla's inventions --
resonance -- which affect planetary systems.
Bubble of Electric Particles
Angels Don't Play This HAARP includes interviews with independent scientists
such as Elizabeth Rauscher. She has a Ph.D., a long and impressive career in
high-energy physics, and has been published in prestigious science journals
and books. Rauscher commented on HAARP. "You're pumping tremendous
energy into an extremely delicate molecular configuration that comprises these
multi-layers we call the ionosphere."
"The ionosphere is prone to catalytic reactions," she explained, "if a
small part is changed, a major change in the ionosphere can happen."
In describing the ionosphere as a delicately balanced system, Dr. Rauscher
shared her mental picture of it -- a soap-bubble-like sphere surrounding Earth's
atmosphere, with movements swirling over the surface of the bubble. If a big
enough hole is punched through it, she predicts, it could pop.
Slicing the Ionosphere
Physicist Daniel Winter, Ph.D., of Waynesville, North Carolina, says, "HAARP
high-frequency emissions can couple with longwave (extremely-low-frequency,
or ELF) pulses the Earth grid uses to distribute information as vibrations to
synchronize dances of life in the biosphere." Dan terms this geomagnetic
action 'Earth's information bloodstream,' and says it is likely that coupling of
HAARP HF (high-frequency) with natural ELF can cause unplanned,
unsuspected side effects.
David Yarrow of Albany, New York, is a researcher with a background in
electronics. He described possible interactions of HAARP radiation with the
ionosphere and Earth's magnetic grid: "HAARP will not burn holes in the
ionosphere. That is a dangerous understatement of what HAARP's giant
gigawatt beam will do. Earth is spinning relative to thin electric shells of the
multilayer membrane of ion-o-speres that absorb and shield Earth's surface
from intense solar radiation, including charged particle storms in solar winds
erupting from the sun. Earth's axial spin means that HAARP -- in a burst lasting
more than a few minutes -- will slice through the ionosphere like a microwave
knife. This produces not a hole but a long tear -- an incision."
Crudely Plucking the Strings
Second concept: As Earth rotates, HAARP will slice across the geomagnetic
flux, a donut-shaped spool of magnetic strings -- like longitude meridians on
maps.
HAARP may not 'cut' these strings in Gaia's magnetic mantle, but will pulse
each thread with harsh, out-of-harmony high frequencies. These noisy
impulses will vibrate geomagnetic flux lines, sending vibrations all through the
geomagnetic web. "
"The image comes to mind of a spider on its web. An insect lands, and the
web's vibrations alert the spider to possible prey. HAARP will be a man-made
microwave finger poking at the web, sending out confusing signals, if not
tearing holes in the threads. "
"Effects of this interference with symphonies of Gaia's geomagnetic harp are
unknown, and I suspect barely thought of. Even if thought of, the intent (of
HAARP) is to learn to exploit any effects, not to play in tune to global
symphonies. "
Among other researchers quoted is Paul Schaefer of Kansas City. His degree is
in electrical engineering and he spent four years building nuclear weapons.
"But most of the theories that we have been taught by scientists to believe in
seem to be falling apart," he says. He talks about imbalances already caused
by the industrial and atomic age, especially by radiation of large numbers of
tiny, high-velocity particles "like very small spinning tops" into our
environment. The unnatural level of motion of highly-energetic particles in the
atmosphere and in radiation belts surrounding Earth is the villain in the
weather disruptions, according to this model, which describes an Earth
discharging its buildup of heat, relieving stress and regaining a balanced
condition through earthquakes and volcanic action.
Feverish Earth
"One might compare the abnormal energetic state of the Earth and its
atmosphere to a car battery which has become overcharged with the normal
flow of energy jammed up, resulting in hot spots, electrical arcing, physical
cracks and general turbulence as the pent-up energy tries to find some place
to go."
In a second analogy, Schaefer says "Unless we desire the death of our planet,
we must end the production of unstable particles which are generating the
earth's fever. A first priority to prevent this disaster would be to shut down all
nuclear power plants and end the testing of atomic weapons, electronic
warfare and 'Star Wars'." Meanwhile, the military builds its biggest ionospheric
heater yet, to deliberately create more instabilities in a huge plasma layer -- the
ionosphere -- and to rev up the energy level of charged particles.
Electronic Rain From The Sky
They have published papers about electron precipitation from the
magnetosphere (the outer belts of charged particles which stream toward
Earth's magnetic poles) caused by man-made very low frequency
electromagnetic waves. "These precipitated particles can produce secondary
ionization, emit X-rays, and cause significant perturbation in the lower
ionosphere."
Two Stanford University radio scientists offer evidence of what technology can
do to affect the sky by making waves on earth; they showed that very low
frequency radio waves can vibrate the magnetosphere and cause high-energy
particles to cascade into Earth's atmosphere. By turning the signal on or off,
they could stop the flow of energetic particles.
Weather Control
Avalanches of energy dislodged by such radio waves could hit us hard. Their
work suggests that technicians could control global weather by sending
relatively small 'signals' into the Van Allen belts (radiation belts around Earth).
Thus Tesla's resonance effects can control enormous energies by tiny
triggering signals.
The Begich/ Manning book asks whether that knowledge will be used by waroriented
or biosphere-oriented scientists.
The military has had about twenty years to work on weather warfare methods,
which it euphemistically calls weather modification. For example, rainmaking
technology was taken for a few test rides in Vietnam. The U.S. Department of
Defense sampled lightning and hurricane manipulation studies in Project
Skyfire and Project Stormfury. And they looked at some complicated
technologies that would give big effects. Angels Don't Play This HAARP cites
an expert who says the military studied both lasers and chemicals which they
figured could damage the ozone layer over an enemy. Looking at ways to
cause earthquakes, as well as to detect them, was part of the project named
Prime Argus, decades ago. The money for that came from the Defense
Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA, now under the acronym ARPA.)
In 1994 the Air Force revealed its Spacecast 2020 master plan which includes
weather control. Scientists have experimented with weather control since the
1940's, but Spacecast 2020 noted that "using environmental modification
techniques to destroy, damage or injure another state are prohibited." Having
said that, the Air Force claimed that advances in technology "compels a
reexamination of this sensitive and potentially risky topic."
40 Years of Zapping the Sky?
As far back as 1958, the chief White House advisor on weather modification,
Captain Howard T. Orville, said the U.S. defense department was studying
"ways to manipulate the charges of the earth and sky and so affect the
weather" by using an electronic beam to ionize or de-ionize the atmosphere
over a given area.
In 1966, Professor Gordon J. F. MacDonald was associate director of the
Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics at the University of California,
Los Angeles, was a member of the President's Science Advisory Committee,
and later a member of the President's Council on Environmental Quality.
He published papers on the use of environmental-control technologies for
military purposes. MacDonald made a revealing comment: "The key to
geophysical warfare is the identification of environmental instabilities to which
the addition of a small amount of energy would release vastly greater amounts
of energy. " World-recognized scientist MacDonald had a number of ideas for
using the environment as a weapon system and he contributed to what was, at
the time, the dream of a futurist. When he wrote his chapter, "How To Wreck
The Environment," for the book Unless Peace Comes, he was not kidding
around. In it he describes the use of weather manipulation, climate
modification, polar ice cap melting or destabilization, ozone depletion
techniques, earthquake engineering, ocean wave control and brain wave
manipulation using the planet's energy fields.
He also said that these types of weapons would be developed and, when used,
would be virtually undetectable by their victims. Is HAARP that weapon? The
military's intention to do environmental engineering is well documented, U.S.
Congress' subcommittee hearings on Oceans and International Environment
looked into military weather and climate modification conducted in the early
1970's. "What emerged was an awesome picture of far-ranging research and
experimentation by the Department of Defense into ways environmental
tampering could be used as a weapon," said another author cited in Angles
Don't Play This HAARP.
The revealed secrets surprised legislators. Would an inquiry into the state of
the art of electromagnetic manipulation surprise lawmakers today? They may
find out that technologies developed out of the HAARP experiments in Alaska
could deliver on Gordon MacDonald's vision because leading-edge scientists
are describing global weather as not only air pressure and thermal systems,
but also as an electrical system.
Small Input - Big Effect
HAARP zaps the ionosphere where it is relatively unstable. A point to
remember is that the ionosphere is an active electrical shield protecting the
planet from the constant bombardment of high-energy particles from space.
This conducting plasma, along with Earth's magnetic field, traps the electrical
plasma of space and holds it back from going directly to the earth's surface,
says Charles Yost of Dynamic Systems, Leicester, North Carolina. "If the
ionosphere is greatly disturbed, the atmosphere below is subsequently
disturbed."
Another scientist interviewed said there is a super-powerful electrical
connection between the ionosphere and the part of the atmosphere where our
weather comes onstage, the lower atmosphere.
One man-made electrical effect -- power line harmonic resonance -- causes
fallout of charged particles from the Van Allen (radiation) belts, and the falling
ions cause ice crystals (which precipitate rain clouds). What about HAARP?
Energy blasted upward from an ionospheric heater is not much compared to
the total in the ionosphere, but HAARP documents admit that thousandfoldgreater
amounts of energy can be released in the ionosphere than injected. As
with MacDonald's "key to geophysical warfare," "nonlinear" effects (described
in the literature about the ionospheric heater) mean small input and large
output. Astrophysicist Adam Trombly told Manning that an acupuncture model
is one way to look at the possible effect of multi-gigawatt pulsing of the
ionosphere. If HAARP hits certain points, those parts of the ionosphere could
react in surprising ways.
Smaller ionospheric heaters such as the one at Arecibo are underneath
relatively placid regions of the ionosphere, compared to the dynamic
movements nearer Earth's magnetic poles. That adds another uncertainty to
HAARP -- the unpredictable and lively upper atmosphere near the North Pole.
HAARP experimenters do not impress commonsense Alaskans such as
Barbara Zickuhr, who says "They're like boys playing with a sharp stick,
finding a sleeping bear and poking it in the butt to see what's going to
happen."
Could They Short-Circuit Earth?
Earth as a spherical electrical system is a fairly well-accepted model. However,
those experimenters who want to make unnatural power connections between
parts of this system might not be thinking of possible consequences. Electrical
motors and generators can be caused to wobble when their circuits are
affected. Could human activities cause a significant change in a planet's
electrical circuit or electrical field? A paper in the respected journal Science
deals with manmade ionization from radioactive material, but perhaps it could
also be studied with HAARP-type skybusters in mind:
"For example, while changes in the earth's electric field resulting from a solar
flare modulating conductivity may have only a barely detectable effect on
meteorology, the situation may be different in regard to electric field changes
caused by manmade ionization... " Meteorology, of course, is the study of the
atmosphere and weather. ionization is what happens when a higher level of
power is zapped into atoms and knocks electrons off the atoms. The resulting
charged particles are the stuff of HAARP. "One look at the weather should tell
us that we are on the wrong path," says Paul Schaefer, commenting on
HAARP-type technologies.
Angels Don't Play This HAARP: Advances in Tesla Technology is about the
military's plan to manipulate that which belongs to the world -- the ionosphere.
The arrogance of the United States government in this is not without
precedent.
Atmospheric nuclear tests had similar goals. More recently, China and France
put their people's money to destructive use in underground nuclear tests. It
was recently reported that the US government spent $3 trillion dollars on its
nuclear program since its beginnings in the 1940's. What new breakthroughs in
life science could have been made with all the money spent on death?
Begich, Manning, Roderick and others believe that democracies need to be
founded on openness, rather than the secrecy which surrounds so much
military science. Knowledge used in developing revolutionary weapons could
be used for healing and helping mankind. Because they are used in new
weapons, discoveries are classified and suppressed. When they do appear in
the work of other independent scientists, the new ideas are often frustrated or
ridiculed, while military research laboratories continue to build their new
machines for the killing fields.
However, the book by Manning and Begich gives hope that the military
industrial academic bureaucratic Goliath can be affected by the combined
power of determined individuals and the alternative press. Becoming informed
is the first step to empowerment.
No comments:
Post a Comment