GEERT WILDERS: CHANGE JORDAN'S NAME TO PALESTINE; etc.

3. Despite the many detractors, foolish ignoramuses, foreign and local armies, and big and small Amalekites, the day is soon approaching when the Jewish People, B"H,  will dwell safely and securely in its GOD GIVEN HOME, BIBLICAL ISRAEL, A.K.A. Judea and Samaria, A.K.A. " the West Bank", A.K.A. the " occupied territories". If there ever WAS a Palestine, this is it, but Palestine is only the name the Roman  murderers, robbers and occupiers gave to Judea and Samaria 2000 years ago 1.Jews are Indigenous Nation! After years of being labelled a "non-Zionist" party, Shas - which represents a largely hareidi-religious Sephardic constituency - stunned many this year by officially defining itself as Zionist and requesting to join the World Zionist Organization, founded by Herzl in 1897... Nissim Ze'ev, a Shas MK, said, "the Jewish people have the right to live in all parts of their indigenous homeland and to maintain and develop their religious and cultural identity as indigenous to the land. Our efforts will be implemented within Jewish communities in Israel and in the Diaspora..." The United Nations currently recognizes as indigenous any nation that declares itself as such, and according to section 10 of the UN General Assembly's 2007 Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous People, "indigenous peoples shall not be forcibly removed from their lands or territories. No relocation shall take place without the free, prior and informed consent of the indigenous peoples concerned." The United Nations currently recognizes as indigenous any nation that declares itself as such, and according to section 10 of the UN General Assembly's 2007 Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous People, "indigenous peoples shall not be forcibly removed from their lands or territories. No relocation shall take place without the free, prior and informed consent of the indigenous peoples concerned and after agreement on just and fair compensation and, where possible, with the option of return." Israel fits all the criteria to be recognized internationally as indigenous natives to the Land of Israel, and the only current requirement is a public declaration from a representative body of the Jewish people, whether it be from Israel's Knesset, the WZO or even the Council of Jewish Communities in Judea and Samaria . "This is very significant with regard to the rights of all Jews in relation to their ancestral homeland," said Ze'ev. "It is especially significant for the Jewish residents of Judea, Samaria, Jerusalem and the Golan Heights who are constantly under the threat of forced expulsions from their lands." Israel, and the only current requirement is a public declaration from a representative body of the Jewish people, whether it be from Israel's Knesset, the WZO or even the Council of Jewish Communities in Judea and Samaria . "This is very significant with regard to the rights of all Jews in relation to their ancestral homeland," said Ze'ev. "It is especially significant for the Jewish residents of Judea, Samaria, Jerusalem and the Golan Heights who are constantly under the threat of forced expulsions from their lands."    From Steven Shamrak   2.What about Jewish rights? Basic rights of Jewish residents in Judea and Samaria severely undermined Hagai Segal Arab Israelis bitterly complained last week that the IDF forbids them from entering the Jewish street in Hebron. Despite the security motive behind the ban (security alone and nothing else,) this is a bothersome phenomenon. It’s somewhat reminiscent of the old South Africa, and it doesn’t only hurt Arabs – many roads in Judea and Samaria are closed off to Jews. We should note that in Hebron there is one street that is partly closed to Arabs and hundreds of streets that are completely closed off to Jews. If a Jew insists on getting there, he will risk being lynched. Should such Jew be able to get out of there, he will immediately be detained by the police for entering a zone that was closed off via an order signed by a general. Officially speaking, this order refers to “Israelis,” yet it unequivocally addresses Jews. Arabs possessing an Israeli ID are allowed to enter Ramallah or Nablus as often as they want. Yet Jews are not allowed to do so. Isn’t that apartheid? And what’s the reason for the silence displayed by Breaking the Silence members in the face of ethnic discrimination against Jews? Up until 10 years ago, Jewish motorists could drive from the community of Dolev to Jerusalem in half an hour. Today, they are forced to drive for an hour and a half, because the High Court of Justice endorsed the IDF’s recommendation to close off a shortcut that passes through the Palestinian village of Ein Arik. Arab motorists are allowed to drive through the village, but Jews are not. Not too long ago, High Court judges forces the IDF to open Highway 443 to Arab traffic, yet they accepted the military explanation for keeping the Ein Arik road closed off to Jews. Military rule Yet beyond the roads, the major harm to Jewish freedom of movement beyond the Green Line is only a tiny part of the overall harm to their basic rights. In fact, the Jews in Judea and Samaria are the only population group in the area still wholly subordinated to a military administration. Since Oslo, most Palestinians enjoy civilian self-rule, yet 300,000 settlers cannot build a balcony without getting an IDF permit. Only recently, a military court ruled that Basic Law: Human Dignity and Freedom does not apply to a Yitzhar resident who was slapped with a restraining order from his home. The same is true for the law on freedom of occupation. In order to complete the grim picture of the situation of Jewish human rights in the territories, we should mention the words of Professor Yedidia Stern, a member of the commission of inquiry into the handling of Gush Katif evacuees. Last week he characterized the injustice caused to the uprooted residents as “the gravest blow to human rights in the State of Israel’s history.” For some reason, Stern’s words elicited almost no public response. Yet next week, tempers will flare again around here because of an Arab who underwent a humiliating security screening at Ben-Gurion Airport. Thank you, Hagai Segal. And thank you, Geert Wilders! 3. Geert Wilders: Change Jordan's Name To Palestine http://www.thejidf.org/2010/06/geert-wilders-change-jordans-name-to.html (Ynet) Geert Wilders, who leads the right-wing Party for Freedom (PVV) in Holland, said last week he believes Jordan should be renamed Palestine. The Jordanian government responded by saying Wilders' speech was reminiscent of the Israeli right wing. "Jordan is Palestine," said Wilders, who heads the third-largest party in Holland. "Changing its name to Palestine will end the conflict in the Middle East and provide the Palestinians with an alternate homeland." Wilders added that Israel deserved a special status in the Dutch government because it was fighting for Jerusalem in its name. "If Jerusalem falls into the hands of the Muslims, Athens and Rome will be next. Thus, Jerusalem is the main front protecting the West. It is not a conflict over territory but rather an ideological battle, between the mentality of the liberated West and the ideology of Islamic barbarism," he said. "There has been an independent Palestinian state since 1946, and it is the kingdom of Jordan." Wilders also called on the Dutch government to refer to Jordan as Palestine and move its embassy to Jerusalem. The Saudi Al-Watan carried Jordan's response to Wilders' speech. The kingdom's embassy in Hague was outraged, and said the Dutch ambassador would soon be summoned to explain. Jordan's minister for media affairs and communications, Nabil Al Sharif, asked for clarifications. He described Wilders' declaration as "an echo of the voice of the Israeli Right" and "crows' screams". "Jordan is an independent and secure country which supports the Palestinian issue, and these imaginings of finding them an alternate homeland are nothing but the delusions of a few people," he said. The PVV nearly tripled its power in the last election, going from nine parliament seats to 24. The right-wing party, which has called for a ban on minarets and Muslim scarves, has been holding so far unsuccessful negotiations with the liberal Right. Brought by A.M. with the following comment: Since the majority of the miscela which refer to themselves as “palestinians” live in the part of the original Jewish National Homeland which is now called “Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan,” and since the majority of the inhabitants of that kingdom consider themselves to belong to the so-called “palestinian people,” it makes sense that the country be renamed “Palestine” and solve the problem once and for all.  Just as Jews from around the world returned to Israel, let the Arab-muslims from wherever they may be, converge on the New Palestine and bring their heritage, customs, and personal attributes together in one place.  (But of course, the rulers of Jordan would never tolerate them!) We already have a two-state solution, imposed on the Jewish Nation when Great Britain’s White Paper unilaterally and illegally sliced off about ¾ of the land assigned by the League of Nations as the Jewish National Homeland.  What Obama and the EU, UN, and others now want is a THREE STATE Solution, creating a second Arab-muslim state out of the Jewish people’s national home. Geert Wilders, leader of the Party For Freedom in Holland, believes that Britain made an error of historic proportions and now suggests a way to rectify it.