La Prise de la Bastille, July 14, 1789
CHANGE - ISN'T CHANGE EXACTLY WHAT OBAMA RECOMMENDS?
I guess Obama has a point there: so let's see how WE can affect change.....
Warning: this is a long article, so long, in fact, that I decided to post the link rather than the article itself.
I did not read it myself, but for those of you with the time and patience, I am sure there is a wealth of information there. The sender is a careful reader who only sends relevant articles.
Comment by Moshe:
בקיצור איך אפשר ע'י עיתונות מגויסת לכוון את דעת ההמון והמאורעות בכוון הרצוי למניפולטור.זה בדיוק מה שהגויים והשמאל ,שונאינו הגדולים עושים לרוב עם ישראל בארץ ישראל ובאמצעות זה הם שולטים וממררים את חיינו ומסכנים אותם יום יום.לולי ניסי ה' היום יומיים הם היו גם חס וחלילה מצליחים.
אגב זה בדיוק גם מה שנעשה בארה'ב עם בחירת אובמה.
הסכנה הכי גדולה בדמוקרטיה שוויונית היא המניפולצה הפסיכולוגו-תקשורתית, וזה כנראה צריך להיות סוף המשטר הדמוקרטי האתאיסטי בעולם, שבס'ד יהרוס את עצמו ,ע'י מלחמות מניפולציה במניפולציה נגדית.
היום הלוחמה הפסיכלוגית מתחילה להיות החשובה ביותר.
ואני יודע שהרבה לא יסכימו ,אבל נהיה כולנו בריאים ונראה איך יראה העולם עוד 20 שנה.
I DID read the article. Several points caught my attention:
1. THE POPE IS VERY WELL AWARE OF THE MECHANICS OF A REVOLUTION, AND IS CLEARLY USING THEM TO THE HILT. WITNESS THE MEDIA IN ISRAEL _JERUSALEM POST, YNET _ TOTALLY BOUGHT OUT BY ROME AND AT THEIR SERVICE.
The debate was between the British minister in Warsaw, Sir Horace Rumbold, and the Papal nuncio, Monsignor Ambrogio Damiano Achille Ratti – the man who was elected Pope as Pius XI two years later. The Englishman said that the internal political situation in Poland was so chaotic that a revolution was inevitable, and that the diplomatic corps therefore should flee the capital and go to Posen (Poznán). The Papal Nuncio disagreed, insisting that a revolution was just as possible in a civilised country like England, Holland or Switzerland as in a country in a state of anarchy. Naturally the Englishman was outraged at the idea that a revolution could ever break out in England. "Oh never!" he exclaimed – and was proved wrong because no revolution did break out in Poland, according to Malaparte because the revolutionary forces were simply not well organised enough.
This anecdote allows Malaparte to discuss the differences between Lenin and Trotsky, two practitioners of the coup d’état/revolution. Malaparte shows that the future Pope was right and that it was wrong to say that pre-conditions were necessary for a revolution to occur. For Malaparte, as for Trotsky, regime change could be promoted in any country, including the stable democracies of Western Europe, providing that there was a sufficiently determined body of men determined to achieve it.
"Münzenberg was not only the inventor of spin, he was also the first person who perfected the art of creating a network of opinion-forming journalists who propagated views which were germane to the needs of the Communist Party in Germany and to the Soviet Union."
" Münzenberg’s tactics are of primary importance to the manipulation of opinion in today’s New World Order. More then ever before, so-called "experts" constantly pop up on our TV screens to explain what is happening, and they are always vehicles for the official party line. They are controlled in various ways, usually by money or by flattery.
( Bernays) "The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organised opinions and habits of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country."
"For the CIA, the strategy of promoting the Non-Communist Left was to become "the theoretical foundation of the Agency’s political operations against Communism over the next two decades."
"The purpose of supporting leftist groups was not to destroy or even dominate, but rather to maintain a discreet proximity to and monitor the thinking of such groups; to provide them with a mouthpiece so that they could blow off steam; and, in extremis, to exercise a final veto over their actions, if they ever got too "radical."
"This cross-over between culture and politics was explicitly promoted by a CIA body which went under an Orwellian name, the Psychological Strategy Board. In 1956, it covertly promoted a European tour by the Metropolitan Opera, the political purpose of which was to encourage multiculturalism."
2. THE DUPLICITY: an example , Serbia. See how the US became a spy and invading army within Serbia, and helped and funded the Muslims.
This reminds me of TIPH in Hevron. Maybe THEY are CIA agents too, ready to attack at a moment's notice, and spying on us day in, day out? Also the way they helped the KLA is the way the US is helping the "POOR PALESTINIANS" WHILE SPREADING THE MYTH OF SAVAGE ATTACKS BY JEWS AGAINST THEM.
AND HOW THEY USED FRONT NGO'S -JUST LIKE THE FORD FOUNDATION AND THE NEW ISRAEL FUND - AND USED TONS OF MONEY FOR SUBVERTING YEHUDA AND SHOMRON.
GEORGE SOROS IS EVEN MENTIONED IN PERSON.... AND NOW HE IS DOING HIS SAME DIRTY TRICKS IN ISRAEL!
DEMOCRATS - I.E. THE LEFT - ARE NOTHING BUT FOREIGN AGENTS!
Exactly the same tactic!
"The strategy began in late 1998 when "a huge CIA mission (got) underway in Kosovo." President Miloševic had allowed the Kosovo Diplomatic Observer Mission to enter Kosovo to monitor the situation in the province. This ad hoc group was immediately stuffed with British and American intelligence agents and special forces – men from the CIA, US naval intelligence, the British SAS and something called "14th intelligence," a body within the British army which operates side by side with the SAS "to provide what is known as ‘deep surveillance’." The immediate purpose of this operation was "Intelligence Preparation of Battlefield" – a modern version of what the Duke of Wellington used to do, riding up and down the battlefield to get the lie of the land before engaging the enemy. So as Marshall puts it, "Officially, the KDOM was run by the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe … unofficially, the CIA ran (it) … The organisation was just packed with them … It was a CIA front." Many of the officers in fact worked for another CIA front, DynCorp, the Virginia-based company which employs mainly "members of US military elite units, or the CIA," as Marshall says. They used the KDOM, which later became the Kosovo Verification Mission, for espionage. Instead of doing the monitoring tasks assigned to them, officers would go off and use their global positioning devices to locate and identify targets which would be later bombed by Nato. Quite how the Yugoslavs could allow 2,000 highly trained secret service agents to roam around their territory is difficult to understand, especially since, as Marshall shows, they knew perfectly well what was going on.
The head of the Kosovo Verification Mission was William Walker, the man deputed to oust Manuel Noriega from power in Panama, and a former ambassador to El Salvador whose US-supported government ran death squads. Walker "discovered" the "massacre" at Racak in January 1999, the event which was used as a pretext for starting the process which led to the bombing which began on 24th March. There is much evidence to suggest that Racak was staged, and that the bodies found were in fact those of KLA fighters, not civilians as was alleged. What is certain is that Walker’s role was so key that the country road in Kosovo which leads to Racak has now been renamed after him. Marshall writes that the date for the war – spring 1999 – was not only decided in late December 1998, but also that the date was communicated to the KLA at the time. This means that when the "massacre" occurred and when Madeleine Albright declared, "Spring has come early," she was behaving rather like Joseph Goebbels who, on hearing the news of the Reichstag fire in 1933, is supposed to have remarked, "What, already?"
At any rate, when the KVM was withdrawn on the eve of the Nato bombing, Marshall says that the CIA officers in it gave all their satellite phones and GPS equipment to the KLA. "The KLA were being trained by the Americans, partially equipped by them, and virtually given territory," Marshall writes – even though he, like all other reporters, helped propagate the myth of systematic Serb atrocities committed against a totally passive Albanian civilian population.
"None of this is conspiracy theory – it is conspiracy fact. The United States considers as a matter of official policy that the promotion of democracy is an important element of its overall national security strategy. Large sections of the State Department, the CIA, para-governmental agencies like the National Endowment for Democracy, and government-funded NGOs like the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, which publishes several works on "democracy promotion." All these operations have one thing in common: they involve the interference, sometimes violent, of Western powers, especially the US, in the political processes of other states, and that interference is very often used to promote the quintessential revolutionary goal, regime change.
Here it is, all explained: manipulation of and by the media, the massive use of disinformation, “spin” and covert government operations in controlling political reality and effecting regime change all over the world. (That includes the USA.) Government intelligence controls the media which, in turn, controls the population; how images are created and reinforced. Purveyance of images and their maintenance by pervasive and continuous reinforcement via a controlled media determines determine political reality. The techniques were perfected in Latin America and have been used by the CIA and the rest of Western intelligence throughout the world: Serbia, Ukraine, Georgia, etc. Do you think they are not used inside the USA as well? This they call :promoting democracy.” George Orwell lives!
Sound familiar? How many times have I pointed it out? The more news reports you read, hear and see the less you understand about what is really happening; that the “news” services are filled with distortion and positive disinformation, that reading or viewing the “news” is merely exposing yourself to someone else’s prejudices and political agenda.
Long and detailed, but critical to begin to understand how you have been had, how you are misled every day.
( an example, DS)
After a long and expensive investigation, the European Union has filed a massive lawsuit against RJ Reynolds (RJR-Nabisco) alleging money laundering for the drug trade running into billions of dollars. The operation was all over Europe and South America and quite probably to the US. It went on for years a RJR reaped billions in profits from it which fueled its aggressive financial affairs. This is revealed in Dillon, Read & the Aristocracy of Stock Profits, a book by Catherine Austin Fitts. She became one of the directors of Dillon Read and Co, a prominent Wall Street firm which represented RJR. (Douglas Dillon, son of the founder, was Secretary of the Treaury.) She quotes extensively from the EU complaint, which is public.
If you have never heard of this case, it is because the media en masse have studiously ignored it. The FBI and the T-men have 300 agents on the Deal, NJ case, which they have been on for ten years. Have they had as many agents on the RJR case? I don’t know. Is it more important than the RJR case? Maybe so, judging from the attention the two have gotten from law enforcement and the media.
On the other hand, maybe if they start opening up the RJR case, it would lead to Mena, Arkansas, which was a major entry point for cocaine for years, including the years when George HW Bush was VP and then President and Clinton was governor and probably the years he was President. Money was laundered through a bank in Mena, with interesting ownership. In short, the case might reveal involvement of the CIA and people at the highest levels of the US government, Wall Street and Corporate America.
The EU has uncovered the facts and laid it all out. All the media have to do is report it. Assume for the moment the worst about the Deal Yeshiva case and the NJ mayors. What makes this case so much more interesting than the RJR-Nabisco case?
More fundamentally, Citizens, do you not see that someone is managing and manipulating your “news”?